Deakin Health Economics, Institute for Health Transformation, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Biostatics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 14;19(11):e0313058. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313058. eCollection 2024.
Effective bowel cancer screening is freely available in Australia, however, there are inequities in utilisation amongst non-English speakers at home. This study estimates the health impacts and cost-effectiveness of recruitment interventions targeted at Arabic and Mandarin speaking populations in Victoria, Australia to increase bowel cancer screening participation.
A Markov microsimulation model simulated the development of bowel cancer, considering National Bowel Cancer Screening Program participation rates. Culturally specific recruitment interventions e.g., community education and tailored paid media for 50-74-year-olds were compared to usual practice. A cost-utility analysis was conducted over a 50-year time horizon from a healthcare perspective, to estimate the cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) based on plausible effectiveness levels. Costs are in 2019 Australian dollars.
Intervention costs were $6.90 per person for the Arabic speaking group and $3.10 for Mandarin speakers. The estimated cost/QALY was $2,781 (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: $2,144─$3,277) when screening increased by 0.2% in the Arabic group, and an estimated 5-6 additional adenoma and cancer cases were detected. In the Mandarin group, the estimated cost/QALY was $1,024/QALY (95%UI: $749─$1,272) when screening increased by 1.1%, and an estimated 18-23 additional adenoma and cancer cases were detected.
Culturally specific recruitment interventions to increase bowel cancer screening are inexpensive and likely to be cost-effective. Improvements in capturing language spoken at home by the National program would facilitate more precise estimates of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of these interventions.
澳大利亚提供有效的结直肠癌筛查,但在国内非英语使用者中,利用情况存在不平等。本研究旨在评估针对澳大利亚维多利亚州阿拉伯语和普通话人群的招募干预措施对提高结直肠癌筛查参与率的健康影响和成本效益。
采用马尔可夫微模拟模型,考虑国家结直肠癌筛查计划的参与率,模拟结直肠癌的发展。针对 50-74 岁人群,比较了文化特异性招募干预措施(如社区教育和针对性付费媒体)与常规做法。从医疗保健角度,在 50 年时间范围内进行成本效用分析,根据可能的有效性水平估算每位质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本。成本以 2019 年澳元计。
阿拉伯语组的干预成本为每人 6.90 澳元,普通话组为 3.10 澳元。当阿拉伯语组的筛查率提高 0.2%时,估计成本/QALY 为 2781 澳元(95%不确定性区间[UI]:2144-3277),预计可检测到 5-6 例额外的腺瘤和癌症病例;在普通话组中,当筛查率提高 1.1%时,估计成本/QALY 为 1024 澳元/QALY(95%UI:749-1272),预计可检测到 18-23 例额外的腺瘤和癌症病例。
增加结直肠癌筛查的文化特异性招募干预措施成本低廉,且可能具有成本效益。国家计划提高对家庭语言的捕捉能力,将有助于更准确地估计这些干预措施的有效性和成本效益。