• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数据共享在有意义使用计划下的意外后果。

Unintended Consequences of Data Sharing Under the Meaningful Use Program.

机构信息

Astronaut, LLC, 7505 Fannin Street, Suite 170, Houston, TX, 77054, United States, 1 7132492874.

出版信息

JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 14;12:e52675. doi: 10.2196/52675.

DOI:10.2196/52675
PMID:39541584
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11581416/
Abstract

Interoperability has been designed to improve the quality and efficiency of health care. It allows the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services to collect data on quality measures as a part of the Meaningful Use program. Covered providers who fail to provide data have lower rates of reimbursement. Unintended consequences also arise at each step of the data collection process: (1) providers are not reimbursed for the extra time required to generate data; (2) patients do not have control over when and how their data are provided to or used by the government; and (3) large datasets increase the chances of an accidental data breach or intentional hacker attack. After detailing the issues, we describe several solutions, including an appropriate data use review board, which is designed to oversee certain aspects of the process and ensure accountability and transparency.

摘要

互操作性旨在提高医疗保健的质量和效率。它允许医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services)收集质量措施的数据,作为有意义使用(Meaningful Use)计划的一部分。未能提供数据的参保者报销率较低。在数据收集过程的每个步骤中还会产生意想不到的后果:(1)医疗机构因生成数据而额外花费的时间得不到补偿;(2)患者无法控制何时以及如何向政府提供或使用其数据;(3)大型数据集增加了数据意外泄露或故意黑客攻击的可能性。在详细说明这些问题后,我们描述了几种解决方案,包括一个适当的数据使用审查委员会,旨在监督该过程的某些方面,确保问责制和透明度。

相似文献

1
Unintended Consequences of Data Sharing Under the Meaningful Use Program.数据共享在有意义使用计划下的意外后果。
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Nov 14;12:e52675. doi: 10.2196/52675.
2
Lower electronic health record adoption and interoperability in rural versus urban physician participants: a cross-sectional analysis from the CMS quality payment program.农村与城市医生参与者在电子健康记录采用率和互操作性方面的比较:来自医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心质量支付计划的横断面分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 23;25(1):128. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12168-5.
3
Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long-Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Policy Changes and Fiscal Year 2019 Rates; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers; Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Programs (Promoting Interoperability Programs) Requirements for Eligible Hospitals, Critical Access Hospitals, and Eligible Professionals; Medicare Cost Reporting Requirements; and Physician Certification and Recertification of Claims. Final rule.医疗保险计划;急性护理医院的住院病人前瞻性支付系统以及长期护理医院前瞻性支付系统和政策变更与2019财年费率;特定提供者的质量报告要求;医疗保险和医疗补助电子健康记录(EHR)激励计划(促进互操作性计划)对合格医院、临界接入医院和合格专业人员的要求;医疗保险成本报告要求;以及医师对索赔的认证和重新认证。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2018 Aug 17;83(160):41144-784.
4
The Medicare Electronic Health Record Incentive Program: provider performance on core and menu measures.医疗保险电子健康记录激励计划:核心和菜单指标的提供者表现。
Health Serv Res. 2014 Feb;49(1 Pt 2):325-46. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12134. Epub 2013 Dec 21.
5
Characteristics of patient portals developed in the context of health information exchanges: early policy effects of incentives in the meaningful use program in the United States.在健康信息交换背景下开发的患者门户的特征:美国有意义使用计划中激励措施的早期政策效果
J Med Internet Res. 2014 Nov 21;16(11):e258. doi: 10.2196/jmir.3698.
6
Area-level factors associated with electronic health record adoption and meaningful use in the Regional Extension Center Program.区域拓展中心项目中与电子健康记录采用及有效使用相关的区域层面因素。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014 Nov-Dec;21(6):976-83. doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2013-002347. Epub 2014 May 5.
7
Quantifying the competitiveness of the electronic health record market and its implications for interoperability.量化电子健康记录市场的竞争力及其对互操作性的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2020 Apr;136:104037. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.104037. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
Provider participation in the Florida Medicaid Promoting Interoperability program: Practice characteristics, meaning use attestations, and incentive payments.提供者参与佛罗里达州医疗补助促进互操作性计划:实践特征、意义使用证明和激励性支付。
Int J Med Inform. 2021 Jun;150:104441. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2021.104441. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
9
Electronic health records systems and hospital clinical performance: a study of nationwide hospital data.电子健康记录系统与医院临床绩效:基于全国医院数据的研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2019 Oct 1;26(10):999-1009. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocz092.
10
Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Electronic Health Record Incentive Program--Stage 3 and Modifications to Meaningful Use in 2015 Through 2017. Final rules with comment period.医疗保险和医疗补助计划;电子健康记录激励计划——2015年至2017年的第3阶段及对有意义使用的修改。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2015 Oct 16;80(200):62761-955.

本文引用的文献

1
Health Records Database and Inherent Security Concerns: A Review of the Literature.健康记录数据库与内在安全问题:文献综述
Cureus. 2022 Oct 11;14(10):e30168. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30168. eCollection 2022 Oct.
2
Trends in U.S. Depression Prevalence From 2015 to 2020: The Widening Treatment Gap.美国 2015 年至 2020 年期间抑郁症患病率趋势:治疗差距扩大。
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Nov;63(5):726-733. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
3
Discrimination, trust, and withholding information from providers: Implications for missing data and inequity.歧视、信任与对医疗服务提供者隐瞒信息:对数据缺失和不公平现象的影响。
SSM Popul Health. 2022 Apr 7;18:101092. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101092. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
The commercialization of patient data in Canada: ethics, privacy and policy.加拿大患者数据的商业化:伦理、隐私与政策
CMAJ. 2022 Jan 24;194(3):E95-E97. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.210455.
5
Racial and ethnic differences in depression: current perspectives.抑郁症中的种族和民族差异:当前观点
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Feb 22;15:603-609. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S128584. eCollection 2019.
6
The history and role of institutional review boards.机构审查委员会的历史与作用。
Virtual Mentor. 2009 Apr 1;11(4):311-21. doi: 10.1001/virtualmentor.2009.11.4.pfor1-0904.
7
The psychiatric interview: validity, structure, and subjectivity.精神病学访谈:有效性、结构和主观性。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2013 Jun;263(4):353-64. doi: 10.1007/s00406-012-0366-z. Epub 2012 Sep 23.