Cruz Aline de Castro, Fonseca Sérgio Teixeira, Araújo Vanessa Lara, Ocarino Juliana Melo, Mendonça Luciana De Michelis, Resende Renan Alves, Souza Thales Rezende
Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Graduate Program in Rehabilitation Sciences, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil; Department of Physical Therapy, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Braz J Phys Ther. 2024 Nov-Dec;28(6):101136. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2024.101136. Epub 2024 Nov 14.
Interactions between hip and foot biomechanical factors may result in different magnitudes of foot pronation during walking.
To investigate non-linear interactions between hip and foot biomechanical factors and their capability to predict foot pronation during walking and identify the profiles of biomechanical factors that predict greater and lower pronation.
This is a cross-sectional study. Fifty-one women were classified into greater and lower foot pronation during walking. Biomechanical factors measured: (1) foot-ankle varus alignment, (2) hip passive stiffness, (3) isokinetic eccentric strength of hip external rotators, and (4) foot abduction angle. Classification and regression trees (CART) were used to investigate non-linear interactions that predict greater and lower foot pronation.
Four main profiles of biomechanical factors were identified as related to greater and lower foot pronation. Profiles for greater pronation were: (1) varus >25.83°; (2) interaction between varus ≤25.83° and hip stiffness ≤0.09 Nm/rad kg; (3) interaction between varus ≤25.83°, hip stiffness >0.09 Nm/rad kg, and foot abduction >19.58° The profile for lower pronation involved an interaction among varus ≤25.83°, hip stiffness >0.09 Nm/rad kg, and foot abduction ≤19.58° The model had 61% sensitivity and 96% specificity, with the total prediction of 78%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.79 (p = 0.001).
Foot-ankle varus, hip passive stiffness, and foot abduction predicted greater and lower foot pronation. Non-linear interactions between hip and foot factors influence the magnitude of foot pronation during walking. The observed profiles help identify which combinations of biomechanical factors should be assessed in individuals with increased or reduced pronation.
髋部与足部生物力学因素之间的相互作用可能导致行走过程中足部内旋程度不同。
研究髋部与足部生物力学因素之间的非线性相互作用及其预测行走时足部内旋的能力,并确定预测内旋程度较高和较低的生物力学因素特征。
这是一项横断面研究。51名女性在行走时被分为足部内旋程度较高和较低两组。测量的生物力学因素包括:(1)足踝内翻对线;(2)髋部被动僵硬度;(3)髋部外旋肌等速离心力量;(4)足部外展角度。使用分类与回归树(CART)来研究预测足部内旋程度较高和较低的非线性相互作用。
确定了与足部内旋程度较高和较低相关的四种主要生物力学因素特征。内旋程度较高的特征为:(1)内翻>25.83°;(2)内翻≤25.83°与髋部僵硬度≤0.09 Nm/rad·kg之间的相互作用;(3)内翻≤25.83°、髋部僵硬度>0.09 Nm/rad·kg与足部外展>19.58°之间的相互作用。内旋程度较低的特征涉及内翻≤25.83°(3)内翻≤25.83°、髋部僵硬度>0.09 Nm/rad·kg与足部外展≤19.58°之间的相互作用。该模型的敏感性为61%,特异性为96%,总预测率为78%。ROC曲线下面积为0.79(p = 0.001)。
足踝内翻、髋部被动僵硬度和足部外展可预测足部内旋程度较高和较低的情况。髋部与足部因素之间的非线性相互作用会影响行走时足部内旋的程度。观察到的特征有助于确定在旋前增加或减少的个体中应评估哪些生物力学因素的组合。