Vittori Arianna, Capovilla Giovanni, Salvador Renato, Santangelo Matteo, Provenzano Luca, Nicoletti Loredana, Costantini Andrea, Forattini Francesca, Pittacolo Matteo, Moletta Lucia, Savarino Edoardo V, Valmasoni Michele
Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy; Chirurgia Generale 1, Azienda Ospedale Università of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, University of Padova, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy; Chirurgia Generale 1, Azienda Ospedale Università of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Feb;29(2):101888. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101888. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
Most existing literature studies reported that laparoscopic fundoplication (LF) is safe in the setting of ineffective or weak peristalsis. However, the effect of the wrap on esophageal motility is still debated. This study aimed to assess how a functioning and effective fundoplication could affect esophageal motility in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
This study analyzed prospectively collected data on patients who underwent laparoscopic Nissen (LN) fundoplication or laparoscopic Toupet (LT) fundoplication for GERD at our department between 2010 and 2022. Demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Patients were evaluated using the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GerdQ), barium swallow, endoscopy, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and 24-hour pH impedance (multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring [MII-pH]) before and after surgery. HRM was reviewed by 2 experts, following the criteria of the Chicago Classification (version 4.0). LF failure was objectively defined in case of abnormal postoperative MII-pH according to the Lyon 2.0 criteria with/without an abnormal GerdQ.
During the study period, 124 patients with GERD (89 males and 35 females) were recruited. Of note, 58 patients underwent LN fundoplication, and 66 patients underwent LT fundoplication. All procedures were completed laparoscopically, and the 90-day postoperative mortality was nil. At the postoperative MII-pH, good outcome was recorded in 103 patients, and failure was recorded in 21 patients. There was a significant association between a successful LF and the normalization of esophageal motility (P < .05).
Our data confirmed that LF is an effective treatment in patients with GERD, regardless of esophageal motility status. Moreover, our results indicate that LF could determine a normalization of motility abnormalities in patients with GERD.
大多数现有文献研究报告称,在蠕动无效或减弱的情况下,腹腔镜胃底折叠术(LF)是安全的。然而,胃底折叠术对食管动力的影响仍存在争议。本研究旨在评估有效的胃底折叠术如何影响胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的食管动力。
本研究分析了2010年至2022年期间在我科因GERD接受腹腔镜尼森(LN)胃底折叠术或腹腔镜图佩特(LT)胃底折叠术的患者的前瞻性收集数据。记录人口统计学和临床特征。在手术前后,使用胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ)、吞钡检查、内镜检查、高分辨率测压(HRM)和24小时pH阻抗(多通道腔内阻抗和pH监测[MII-pH])对患者进行评估。HRM由2名专家根据芝加哥分类(第4.0版)标准进行审查。根据里昂2.0标准,术后MII-pH异常且伴有/不伴有GerdQ异常的情况被客观定义为LF失败。
在研究期间,招募了124例GERD患者(89例男性和35例女性)。值得注意的是,58例患者接受了LN胃底折叠术,66例患者接受了LT胃底折叠术。所有手术均通过腹腔镜完成,术后90天死亡率为零。在术后MII-pH检查中,103例患者结果良好,21例患者结果失败。成功的LF与食管动力正常化之间存在显著关联(P <.05)。
我们的数据证实,LF对GERD患者是一种有效的治疗方法,无论食管动力状态如何。此外,我们的结果表明,LF可以使GERD患者的动力异常恢复正常。