• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[冠状动脉疾病多支血管不适合血运重建:当代队列研究]

[Coronary artery disease multivessel not amenable to revascularization: contemporary cohort].

作者信息

Inzunza-Cervantes Gustavo, Herrera-Gavilanes Juan Ramón, Félix-Córdova Josué Abisai, Padilla-Islas Luis Alejandro, Ornelas-Aguirre José Manuel, Cortés-García Víctor Adrián

机构信息

Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Centro Médico Nacional del Noroeste, Hospital de Especialidades No. 2 "Luis Donaldo Colosio Murrieta", Grupo de Investigación Cardiovascular. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, México.

Universidad de Sonora, Departamento de Ciencias de la Salud. Ciudad Obregón, Sonora, México.

出版信息

Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jul 1;62(4):1-9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11397136.

DOI:10.5281/zenodo.11397136
PMID:39542436
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12338978/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Severe diffuse coronary artery disease with anatomy that is not amenable to revascularization represents a poorly studied entity, with a poorly defined prognosis and prevalence, associated with high morbidity and mortality, poor quality of life and high hospitalization rates.

OBJECTIVE

Due to the limited evidence in this clinical field and the absence of contemporary studies, we decided to explore this line of research, determining epidemiological, clinical and prognostic aspects.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Analytical, retrospective observational cohort study, carried out in a National Medical Center.

RESULTS

The prevalence of three-vessel coronary artery disease not susceptible to revascularization was 12.2%, the majority were men (66%), over 65 years of age, with a high burden of comorbidities: pharmacological management consisted of beta blockers (91.5 %), antiplatelet aggregation (95.3%) and statins (95.3%): cardiovascular mortality was 9.4%, with myocardial infarction occurring in 10.4%: the predictor variables of mortality were chronic kidney disease, age over 70 years, insufficiency mitral valve.

CONCLUSION

Coronary artery disease of three vessels not susceptible to revascularization continues to be a frequent entity, with a high-risk clinical and anatomical profile, with a better contemporary prognosis despite the multiple gaps in knowledge that limit its understanding and treatment.

摘要

背景

严重弥漫性冠状动脉疾病,其解剖结构不适合进行血运重建,这是一个研究较少的实体,预后和患病率定义不明确,与高发病率、高死亡率、低生活质量和高住院率相关。

目的

由于该临床领域证据有限且缺乏当代研究,我们决定探索这一研究方向,确定其流行病学、临床和预后方面的情况。

材料与方法

在一家国家医疗中心进行分析性、回顾性观察队列研究。

结果

无法进行血运重建的三支血管冠状动脉疾病患病率为12.2%,大多数为男性(66%),年龄超过65岁,合并症负担较重:药物治疗包括β受体阻滞剂(91.5%)、抗血小板聚集药物(95.3%)和他汀类药物(95.3%);心血管死亡率为9.4%,心肌梗死发生率为10.4%;死亡率的预测变量为慢性肾病、70岁以上年龄、二尖瓣功能不全。

结论

无法进行血运重建的三支血管冠状动脉疾病仍然是一种常见疾病,具有高风险的临床和解剖学特征,尽管存在诸多知识空白限制了对其的理解和治疗,但当代预后较好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/65f706724421/04435117-62-4-e5858-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/42958ffe8ee8/04435117-62-4-e5858-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/ee985c18f9a2/04435117-62-4-e5858-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/bc8f2a9a60f1/04435117-62-4-e5858-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/a7fd227d9d78/04435117-62-4-e5858-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/e69f767e9c22/04435117-62-4-e5858-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/65f706724421/04435117-62-4-e5858-f004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/42958ffe8ee8/04435117-62-4-e5858-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/ee985c18f9a2/04435117-62-4-e5858-c001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/bc8f2a9a60f1/04435117-62-4-e5858-c002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/a7fd227d9d78/04435117-62-4-e5858-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/e69f767e9c22/04435117-62-4-e5858-f003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d70c/12338978/65f706724421/04435117-62-4-e5858-f004.jpg

相似文献

1
[Coronary artery disease multivessel not amenable to revascularization: contemporary cohort].[冠状动脉疾病多支血管不适合血运重建:当代队列研究]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jul 1;62(4):1-9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11397136.
2
Impact of Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.多支冠状动脉疾病患者经皮血管重建不完全的影响:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Am Heart Assoc. 2016 Dec 16;5(12):e004598. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.116.004598.
3
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
4
Complete versus culprit-only revascularisation in ST elevation myocardial infarction with multi-vessel disease.ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变时完全血运重建与仅罪犯血管血运重建的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 3;5(5):CD011986. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011986.pub2.
5
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jan 5;2016(1):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub3.
6
Timing of Complete Revascularization with Multivessel PCI for Myocardial Infarction.多血管 PCI 治疗心肌梗死的完全血运重建时机。
N Engl J Med. 2023 Oct 12;389(15):1368-1379. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2307823. Epub 2023 Aug 27.
7
Transmyocardial laser revascularization versus medical therapy for refractory angina.经心肌激光血运重建术与药物治疗难治性心绞痛的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Feb 27;2015(2):CD003712. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003712.pub3.
8
[Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].[容量与健康结果:来自系统评价和意大利医院数据评估的证据]
Epidemiol Prev. 2013 Mar-Jun;37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100.
9
Meta-Analysis Comparing Complete Revascularization Versus Infarct-Related Only Strategies for Patients With ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.比较完全血运重建与仅针对ST段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的梗死相关血管血运重建策略的Meta分析
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;118(10):1466-1472. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2016.08.009. Epub 2016 Aug 23.
10
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.

本文引用的文献

1
Surgical Turned-Downed CHIP Cases-Can PCI Save the Day?手术拒绝的CHIP病例——PCI能挽救局面吗?
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 7;9:872398. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.872398. eCollection 2022.
2
Therapeutic Approaches for the No-Option Refractory Angina Patient.无选择难治性心绞痛患者的治疗方法。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Feb;14(2):e009002. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.009002. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
3
The Art of the Possible.可行之事的艺术。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2020 Mar;21(3):348-349. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2019.12.037. Epub 2020 Jan 7.
4
Surgical Turndown: "What's in a Name?" for Patients Deemed Ineligible for Surgical Revascularization.手术削减:对被认为不适合血管重建手术的患者来说,“名字”意味着什么?
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Aug;35(8):959-966. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 20.
5
"No option" patients for coronary revascularization: the only thing that is constant is change.冠状动脉血运重建的“无选择”患者:唯一不变的是变化。
J Thorac Dis. 2019 Mar;11(Suppl 3):S300-S302. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.01.12.
6
No Option? Maybe just a matter of time, as in No Option for now?没有选择?也许只是时间问题,就像现在没有选择一样?
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Feb 15;93(3):E187-E188. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28005.
7
Revascularization in "no option" patients with refractory angina: Frequency, etiology and outcomes.“无选择”难治性心绞痛患者的血运重建:频率、病因和结局。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 1;92(7):1215-1219. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27707. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
8
Ten-year follow-up after combined coronary artery bypass grafting and transmyocardial laser revascularization in patients with disseminated coronary atherosclerosis.弥漫性冠状动脉粥样硬化患者冠状动脉搭桥术与心肌激光血运重建联合治疗后的十年随访
Lasers Med Sci. 2018 Sep;33(7):1527-1535. doi: 10.1007/s10103-018-2514-9. Epub 2018 May 7.
9
ACC/AATS/AHA/ASE/ASNC/SCAI/SCCT/STS 2017 Appropriate Use Criteria for Coronary Revascularization in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, American Society of Echocardiography, American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.美国心脏病学会/美国胸外科医师协会/美国心脏协会/美国超声心动图学会/美国核心脏病学会/心血管造影和介入学会/心血管计算机断层扫描学会/胸外科医师学会2017年稳定型缺血性心脏病患者冠状动脉血运重建适宜性标准:美国心脏病学会适宜性标准工作组、美国胸外科协会、美国心脏协会、美国超声心动图学会、美国核心脏病学会、心血管造影和介入学会、心血管计算机断层扫描学会及胸外科医师学会报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 May 2;69(17):2212-2241. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 10.
10
A Novel Intra-aortic Device Designed for Coronary Blood Flow Amplification in Unrevascularizable Patients.一种专为不可行血运重建患者的冠状动脉血流增加而设计的新型主动脉内装置。
J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2016 Aug;9(4):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s12265-016-9702-4. Epub 2016 Jun 3.