• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

手术削减:对被认为不适合血管重建手术的患者来说,“名字”意味着什么?

Surgical Turndown: "What's in a Name?" for Patients Deemed Ineligible for Surgical Revascularization.

机构信息

Interventional Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Montréal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

Interventional Cardiology Division, Department of Medicine, Montréal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 2019 Aug;35(8):959-966. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.017
PMID:31376909
Abstract

Optimal revascularization in severe ischemic heart disease (SIHD) is addressed in all clinical guidelines. With an aging patient population, a growing challenge remains the management of patients with SIHD deemed ineligible for surgical revascularization, the so-called surgical turndown patient. The status of surgical ineligibility remains associated with worse clinical outcomes. As the general population grows older and comorbidities increase, this subset of SIHD will likely increase. Ascribing the label of surgical turndown has significant adverse prognostic implications, and thus, careful assessment is required as key issues related to frailty and completeness of revascularization need to be taken into consideration in the decision-making process. Clearly defining criteria for surgical turndowns are paramount, as well as a comprehensive assessment of revascularization suitability. As such, an integrated Heart Team represents the favoured path forward to ensure patient-centred cardiovascular care. The Heart Team approach can appropriately manage issues related to revascularization in patients with SIHD with multiple comorbidities. Therefore, the focus of this review will be on the importance of the diagnosis of surgical turndown, its impact on clinical outcomes, and factors to bear in mind when considering revascularization in this challenging patient subgroup.

摘要

在所有临床指南中都涉及到严重缺血性心脏病(SIHD)的最佳血运重建。随着患者人群老龄化,一个日益严峻的挑战仍然是管理被认为不适合手术血运重建的 SIHD 患者,即所谓的手术拒绝患者。手术不合格的状态仍然与更差的临床结果相关。随着普通人群年龄的增长和合并症的增加,这类 SIHD 患者可能会增加。将手术拒绝的标签归因于具有显著的不良预后意义,因此,需要进行仔细的评估,因为在决策过程中需要考虑与脆弱性和血运重建完整性相关的关键问题。明确界定手术拒绝的标准以及全面评估血运重建的适宜性至关重要。因此,综合心脏团队是确保以患者为中心的心血管护理的首选方法。心脏团队的方法可以适当地处理患有多种合并症的 SIHD 患者的血运重建相关问题。因此,本次综述的重点将放在手术拒绝的诊断的重要性、其对临床结果的影响以及在考虑对这一具有挑战性的亚组患者进行血运重建时需要考虑的因素。

相似文献

1
Surgical Turndown: "What's in a Name?" for Patients Deemed Ineligible for Surgical Revascularization.手术削减:对被认为不适合血管重建手术的患者来说,“名字”意味着什么?
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Aug;35(8):959-966. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.05.017. Epub 2019 May 20.
2
Kidney function modifies the selection of treatment strategies and long-term survival in stable ischaemic heart disease: insights from the Alberta Provincial Project for Outcomes Assessment in Coronary Heart Disease (APPROACH) registry.肾功能改变了稳定型缺血性心脏病治疗策略的选择和长期生存:来自艾伯塔省冠心病结局评估项目(APPROACH)注册的研究结果。
Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2018 Oct 1;4(4):274-282. doi: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcx042.
3
Surgical Revascularization in Older Adults with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy.老年缺血性心肌病患者的外科血管重建术
Heart Fail Clin. 2017 Jul;13(3):571-580. doi: 10.1016/j.hfc.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 May 6.
4
International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches (ISCHEMIA) trial: Rationale and design.国际比较医疗与介入治疗缺血效果研究(ISCHEMIA)试验:原理与设计。
Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:124-135. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.04.011. Epub 2018 Apr 21.
5
The Current Role of Viability Imaging to Guide Revascularization and Therapy Decisions in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Left Ventricular Function.目前,在左心室收缩功能降低的心力衰竭患者中,通过存活心肌显像来指导血运重建和治疗决策的作用。
Can J Cardiol. 2019 Aug;35(8):1015-1029. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2019.04.029. Epub 2019 May 24.
6
Clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention in patients turned down for surgical revascularization.因手术血运重建被拒绝的患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的临床结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Jul;90(1):94-101. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26781. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
7
Revascularization heart team recommendations as an adjunct to appropriate use criteria for coronary revascularization in patients with complex coronary artery disease.血运重建心脏团队建议作为复杂冠状动脉疾病患者冠状动脉血运重建适当使用标准的辅助措施。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016 Oct;88(4):E103-E112. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26276. Epub 2015 Nov 3.
8
Challenges with Evidence-Based Management of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease.稳定型缺血性心脏病循证管理面临的挑战。
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2017 Feb;19(2):11. doi: 10.1007/s11886-017-0820-7.
9
Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on Outcomes of Myocardial Revascularization in Patients With Diabetes.慢性肾脏病对糖尿病患者血运重建治疗结局的影响。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Feb 5;73(4):400-411. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.044.
10
2017 Versus 2012 Appropriate Use Criteria for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: Impact on Appropriateness Ratings.2017 年与 2012 年经皮冠状动脉介入治疗适宜性标准比较:对适宜性评分的影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Mar 12;11(5):473-478. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.01.235.

引用本文的文献

1
[Coronary artery disease multivessel not amenable to revascularization: contemporary cohort].[冠状动脉疾病多支血管不适合血运重建:当代队列研究]
Rev Med Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2024 Jul 1;62(4):1-9. doi: 10.5281/zenodo.11397136.