Suppr超能文献

多中心随机对照试验比较 Bankart 修复与 remplissage 和 Latarjet 手术治疗伴亚临界骨量丢失的肩关节不稳定(STABLE):研究方案。

Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing Bankart repair with remplissage and Latarjet procedure in shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss (STABLE): study protocol.

机构信息

Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Northshore Orthopedics, Glendale, Illinois, USA.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Nov 14;14(11):e089831. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089831.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Recurrent shoulder dislocations often cause attrition of the labrum and progressive loss of the anterior bony contour of the glenoid. Treatment options for this pathology involve either soft tissue repair or bony augmentation procedure. The optimal management for patients with shoulder instability with subcritical bone loss remains unknown and current clinical practice is highly varied.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Shoulder instability Trial comparing Arthroscopic stabilisation Benefits compared with Latarjet procedure Evaluation (STABLE) is an ongoing multicentre, randomised controlled trial of 114 patients diagnosed with recurrent anterior shoulder instability and subcritical glenoid bone loss (10%-20%, measured on 3D CT using circle of best fit technique). Patients are randomised either arthroscopic capsuloligamentous repair (Bankart repair+remplissage) or open or arthroscopic coracoid transfer (Latarjet procedure). The primary outcome of this trial will be the between-group difference in the change from baseline to 24 months postintervention in Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index scores. Secondary outcomes include: (1) rates of recurrent shoulder dislocations and symptoms of instability up to 24 months' postsurgery; (2) clinical outcomes measured by American Shoulder and Elbow Society score, Shoulder Activity Scale, EQ-5D and Patient Satisfaction Scale; (3) physical examination (range of motion, stability); (4) return to previous level of activity/sport; (5) rate of shoulder-related complications and serious adverse events.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This protocol has been reviewed and approved by the Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board (HiREB; project number 15998) prior to commencement of the trial. Results from the study will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal regardless of whether there are statistically significant findings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05705479; this study was prospectively registered on clinicaltrials.gov.

摘要

简介

复发性肩关节脱位常导致盂唇磨损和肩胛盂前骨性轮廓进行性丢失。针对这种病理,治疗方案包括软组织修复或骨增强术。对于存在亚临界骨量丢失的肩关节不稳定患者,最佳治疗方法尚不清楚,目前的临床实践差异很大。

方法和分析

正在进行的多中心、随机对照试验——肩不稳定试验比较关节镜稳定与 Latarget 手术评估(STABLE),纳入了 114 名被诊断为复发性前向肩关节不稳定和亚临界肩胛盂骨量丢失(使用最佳拟合技术的 3D CT 测量,丢失量为 10%-20%)的患者。患者被随机分配接受关节镜下囊-韧带修复(Bankart 修复+填充术)或开放或关节镜下喙突转移(Latarget 手术)。该试验的主要结局是,在 24 个月的干预后,Western Ontario 肩部不稳定指数评分从基线的组间差异。次要结局包括:(1)24 个月内复发性肩关节脱位和不稳定症状的发生率;(2)临床结局,包括美国肩肘协会评分、肩活动量表、EQ-5D 和患者满意度量表;(3)体格检查(活动范围、稳定性);(4)恢复到以前的活动/运动水平;(5)肩部相关并发症和严重不良事件的发生率。

伦理和传播

该方案在试验开始前已被汉密尔顿综合研究伦理委员会(HiREB;项目编号 15998)审查和批准。无论是否有统计学意义,研究结果都将提交给同行评议的期刊发表。

试验注册号

NCT05705479;该研究前瞻性地在 clinicaltrials.gov 上注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5e96/11575273/ee4f69ba995b/bmjopen-14-11-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验