Suppr超能文献

内镜下静脉曲张结扎术与非选择性β受体阻滞剂在2型胃食管静脉曲张一级预防中的疗效比较:一项倾向评分加权调整研究

Comparative efficacy of endoscopic variceal ligation versus non-selective beta-blockers in primary prevention of gastroesophageal varix type 2: an IPTW-adjusted study.

作者信息

Liu Linxiang, Ye Shenfeng, Nie Yuan, Zhu Xuan

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Provincial Key Laboratory of Digestive Diseases, Jiangxi Clinical Research Center for Gastroenterology, Jiangxi Medical College, Digestive Disease Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, No.17, Yongwaizhengjie Road, Donghu District, Nanchang, 330006, Jiangxi, China.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):332-340. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11396-4. Epub 2024 Nov 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Practice guidelines recommend non-selective beta-blockers (NSBB) and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) for primary prevention in cirrhosis patients with esophageal varices. However, there is no clear recommendation for primary prevention strategies for gastric varices, particularly GOV-2. Our objective is to investigate the incidence of initial bleeding and liver-related complications when NSBB and EVL are used for primary prevention in GOV-2.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from patients with GOV-2 gastric varices. Patients were divided into the NSBB group or the EVL group. Differences in the incidence of initial bleeding within 1 year, as well as the occurrence of complications such as hepatic encephalopathy and ascites, were compared between the two groups before and after adjustment for Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (IPTW). A Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify independent risk factors for the first bleeding event.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients in the NSBB group and 66 patients in the EVL group. Before IPTW adjustment, there were differences between the two groups in sex, portal hypertensive gastropathy, esophageal variceal diameter, red signs, FIB-4, and MELD scores. After IPTW adjustment, these differences were balanced, with standardized mean differences (SMDs) within acceptable ranges. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no difference in bleeding rates between the two groups before or after IPTW adjustment. After IPTW adjustment, Cox regression analysis identified esophageal variceal diameter (HR:5.59 (2.03-15.39), p < 0.001) and MELD score (HR:1.17 (1.01-1.23), p = 0.042) were independent risk factors for bleeding. NSBB treatment did not reduce the incidence of liver-related complications within one year compared to EVL.

CONCLUSION

For primary prevention of bleeding in cirrhotic patients with GOV-2, EVL does not significantly reduce initial bleeding episodes or liver-related complications compared to NSBB.

摘要

背景

实践指南推荐使用非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBB)和内镜下静脉曲张结扎术(EVL)对患有食管静脉曲张的肝硬化患者进行一级预防。然而,对于胃静脉曲张,尤其是胃静脉曲张2型(GOV-2)的一级预防策略尚无明确建议。我们的目的是研究NSBB和EVL用于GOV-2一级预防时的初次出血发生率和肝脏相关并发症。

方法

对GOV-2型胃静脉曲张患者的数据进行回顾性分析。将患者分为NSBB组或EVL组。在对治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)进行调整前后,比较两组在1年内初次出血发生率以及肝性脑病和腹水等并发症的发生情况。使用Cox比例风险模型确定首次出血事件的独立危险因素。

结果

NSBB组有60例患者,EVL组有66例患者。在IPTW调整前,两组在性别、门静脉高压性胃病、食管静脉曲张直径、红色征、FIB-4和终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分方面存在差异。IPTW调整后,这些差异得到平衡,标准化均值差异(SMD)在可接受范围内。Kaplan-Meier生存分析显示,在IPTW调整前后两组的出血率无差异。IPTW调整后,Cox回归分析确定食管静脉曲张直径(风险比:5.59(2.03 - 15.39),p < 0.001)和MELD评分(风险比:1.17(1.01 - 1.23),p = 0.042)是出血的独立危险因素。与EVL相比,NSBB治疗在1年内并未降低肝脏相关并发症的发生率。

结论

对于GOV-2型肝硬化患者的出血一级预防,与NSBB相比,EVL并未显著降低初次出血事件或肝脏相关并发症的发生率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验