Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤减压性颅骨切开术相关的脑池造口术:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Cisternostomy associated with decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Surgery, Medical School, Clinics Hospital, Federal University of Goiás, Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil.

出版信息

Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Nov 15;47(1):850. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-03102-8.

Abstract

Decompressive craniectomy (DC) has been the main surgical treatment of refractory high intracranial pressure (ICP) in traumatic brain injury (TBI) for decades. Basal cisternostomy emerged as a novel option in brain trauma, with results still unclear. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing cisternostomy added to conventional DC versus DC alone for the treatment of TBI. This study was designed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Three databases were systematically searched for studies comparing cisternostomy + DC versus DC alone. Primary outcomes were overall mortality, length of stay in ICU care, duration of mechanical ventilation. Review Manager was used for statistical analysis and I measured heterogeneity. A total of seven studies and 980 patients were included in this meta-analysis, 473 in the cisternostomy + DC group and 507 in the DC group. Age ranged from 14 to 69 years old, with 76% male patients. Overall mortality was significantly lower in the cisternostomy + DC group (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.53-0.92; p = 0.01; I = 31%). Length of stay in ICU care was significantly reduced in the patients submitted to cisternostomy + DC (OR -4.58; CI -6.78, -2.37); p < 0.0001; I = 35%). The mean duration in mechanical ventilation was significantly lower in the group submitted to cisternostomy + DC (-3.49; 95% CI-6.79, -0.20; p = 0.04; I = 86%). Regarding functional outcomes, the scarce and heterogeneous data were not sufficient to make any conclusion about the effect of cisternostomy on functional outcomes, but tends to favor patients who underwent cisternostomy combined with DC. In this meta-analysis, the implementation of cisternostomy added to conventional DC was associated with lower mortality, days in mechanical ventilation and length of stay in ICU care. Larger prospective and randomized cohorts are necessary to recommend this procedure on a large scale.

摘要

去骨瓣减压术 (DC) 几十年来一直是创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 中治疗难治性高颅内压 (ICP) 的主要手术治疗方法。基底池造瘘术作为一种新型的脑外伤治疗方法出现了,但结果尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了基底池造瘘术联合常规 DC 与单纯 DC 治疗 TBI 的效果。这项研究是根据系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目 (PRISMA) 指南设计的。我们系统性地检索了三个数据库,以比较基底池造瘘术联合 DC 与单纯 DC 的研究。主要结局是总体死亡率、ICU 护理时间、机械通气时间。使用 Review Manager 进行统计学分析,并用 I ² 衡量异质性。共有 7 项研究和 980 名患者纳入了这项荟萃分析,基底池造瘘术联合 DC 组 473 例,单纯 DC 组 507 例。年龄在 14 至 69 岁之间,76%为男性患者。基底池造瘘术联合 DC 组的总体死亡率显著降低 (OR 0.70;95%CI 0.53-0.92;p=0.01;I=31%)。接受基底池造瘘术联合 DC 的患者 ICU 护理时间明显缩短 (OR -4.58;CI -6.78,-2.37);p<0.0001;I=35%)。接受基底池造瘘术联合 DC 的患者机械通气时间的平均值明显缩短 (-3.49;95%CI-6.79,-0.20;p=0.04;I=86%)。关于功能结局,由于数据稀少且存在异质性,无法得出关于基底池造瘘术对功能结局影响的任何结论,但倾向于有利于接受基底池造瘘术联合 DC 治疗的患者。在这项荟萃分析中,基底池造瘘术联合常规 DC 的实施与死亡率降低、机械通气时间和 ICU 护理时间缩短相关。需要更大规模的前瞻性和随机队列研究来推荐这种治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验