Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Institute of Odontology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, PO Box 450, Gothenburg, SE-405 30, Sweden.
Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology Department, Region Hospital Halland, Halmstad, Sweden.
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Nov 15;28(12):641. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-06034-1.
To evaluate at which thickness marginal bone becomes visible to the observer on cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images and how reconstruction technique and viewing mode affect assessment.
Fourteen anterior teeth from six human mandibles were examined with two CBCT resolution protocols: standard- and high-resolution. Distance from the cementoenamel junction to the visible marginal bone level (MBL) was measured in three groups of reconstructed CBCT images: multiplanar reformation (MPR) with grey scale, MPR with inverted grey scale, and 3D rendering. These measurements were used to identify the bone level where marginal bone width should be measured on histological photographs of sliced teeth. Gold standards comprised measurements of bone thickness at the superior MBL on histological photographs.
MPR grey scale images exposed at high-resolution settings yielded highest validity: bone widths of 0.173 mm (buccal) and 0.356 mm (lingual) were necessary for visibility on a CBCT image. 3D-rendered lingual surfaces exposed with high-resolution settings had lowest validity. Intra-observer agreement for all CBCT and histological measurements was high.
The best CBCT resolution protocol, reconstruction technique, and viewing mode for analyzing buccal and lingual surfaces of the alveolar bone margin are images exposed with a high-resolution protocol, reconstructed using MPR, and viewed in grey scale. Bone thickness required to be visualized was twice lingually compared to buccally.
The visualization of bone thickness in CBCT requires a greater thickness on the lingual side compared to the buccal side. 3D-rendered reconstructions should be avoided when evaluating thin bony structures.
评估在锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像中观察者能看到多厚的边缘骨,以及重建技术和观察模式如何影响评估。
从 6 个人类下颌骨的 14 颗前牙进行了检查,使用了两种 CBCT 分辨率方案:标准分辨率和高分辨率。在三种重建 CBCT 图像组中测量从牙骨质-釉质交界处到可见边缘骨水平(MBL)的距离:灰度多平面重建(MPR)、灰度反转 MPR 和 3D 渲染。这些测量用于确定在切片牙齿的组织学照片上测量边缘骨宽度的骨水平。金标准包括在组织学照片上测量上 MBL 的骨厚度。
在高分辨率设置下暴露的 MPR 灰度图像具有最高的有效性:在 CBCT 图像上可见的骨宽度分别为 0.173 毫米(颊侧)和 0.356 毫米(舌侧)。在高分辨率设置下暴露的 3D 渲染舌侧表面具有最低的有效性。所有 CBCT 和组织学测量的观察者内一致性都很高。
分析牙槽骨边缘颊侧和舌侧的最佳 CBCT 分辨率方案、重建技术和观察模式是使用高分辨率方案暴露、使用 MPR 重建和以灰度显示的图像。为了可见,所需的骨厚度在舌侧是颊侧的两倍。
在 CBCT 中观察骨厚度需要在舌侧比颊侧有更大的厚度。在评估薄骨结构时,应避免使用 3D 渲染重建。