• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

协调编码在医疗器械不良事件报告中的应用研究。

The application study of harmonization code in medical device adverse event reporting.

机构信息

Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, 170, Jomaru-Ro, Bucheon, 14584, Republic of Korea.

Center for Medical Device Safety Information Monitoring, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, 170, Jomaru-Ro, Bucheon, 14584, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1402. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11885-1.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-024-11885-1
PMID:39543640
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11562707/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The reporting of adverse events in medical devices (MD) is a starting point of post-market surveillance and the most common source of initial safety signals. Because MD adverse events (AE) occur globally and involve high-profile international public health crises, international regulators implanted standard codes for MDAE reporting. This study aimed to assess the application of MDAE terminology and codes by providing examples of virtual events.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted among participants of the MD Training Program for Regulatory Authorities which provide International Medical Device Regulators Forum (IMDRF) adverse event terminology and codes, and six virtual MDAE cases.

RESULTS

All 29 of the 72 participants were regulators. In all cases, most participants selected the broad (level 1) codes rather than the detailed (level 2 or level 3) codes. While responders selected a variety of codes for all annexes in case 1, over 50% of responders selected the intended codes in case 6. The codes for cause investigation were chosen more frequently than other annexes for device problem, components, and health effect. No differences were observed in code selection amongst different stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the diversification in terminology and code selection for reporting MDAEs.

摘要

背景

医疗器械不良事件报告是上市后监测的起点,也是最初安全信号的最常见来源。由于医疗器械不良事件(AE)在全球范围内发生,并涉及备受瞩目的国际公共卫生危机,国际监管机构为 MDAE 报告植入了标准代码。本研究旨在通过提供虚拟事件示例来评估 MDAE 术语和代码的应用。

方法

对参加医疗器械监管机构培训计划的人员进行了在线调查,该计划提供了国际医疗器械监管者论坛(IMDRF)不良事件术语和代码,以及六个虚拟 MDAE 案例。

结果

72 名参与者中的 29 名全部为监管人员。在所有情况下,大多数参与者选择了广泛的(级别 1)代码,而不是详细的(级别 2 或级别 3)代码。虽然在案例 1 中,应答者为所有附件选择了各种代码,但在案例 6 中,超过 50%的应答者选择了预期的代码。在设备问题、组件和健康影响方面,用于原因调查的代码比其他附件更频繁地被选中。不同利益相关者之间在代码选择上没有差异。

结论

我们确定了报告 MDAE 时术语和代码选择的多样化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25d/11562707/7315fd37e958/12913_2024_11885_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25d/11562707/02dadff04823/12913_2024_11885_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25d/11562707/7315fd37e958/12913_2024_11885_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25d/11562707/02dadff04823/12913_2024_11885_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f25d/11562707/7315fd37e958/12913_2024_11885_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
The application study of harmonization code in medical device adverse event reporting.协调编码在医疗器械不良事件报告中的应用研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 14;24(1):1402. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11885-1.
2
Serious adverse event reporting in a medical device information system.医疗设备信息系统中的严重不良事件报告
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011;169:834-8.
3
FDA adverse Event Problem Codes: standardizing the classification of device and patient problems associated with medical device use.美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件问题代码:规范与医疗器械使用相关的器械和患者问题的分类。
Biomed Instrum Technol. 2010 May-Jun;44(3):248-56. doi: 10.2345/0899-8205-44.3.248.
4
Which Health Impacts of Medical Device Adverse Event Should Be Reported Immediately in Korea?在韩国,哪些医疗器械不良事件的健康影响应该立即报告?
J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e591-e595. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000877.
5
User reporting of medical device related incidents.用户对医疗器械相关事件的报告。
Med Device Technol. 2003 May;14(4):26-9.
6
Pattern of Medical Device Adverse Events in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Northern India: An Ambispective Study.印度北部一家三级保健医院医疗器械不良事件的发生模式:一项前瞻性研究。
J Assoc Physicians India. 2024 Jun;72(6):62-68. doi: 10.59556/japi.72.0424.
7
[The global harmonization task force : successes and challenges].[全球协调工作组:成就与挑战]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2009 Jun;52(6):601-4. doi: 10.1007/s00103-009-0858-9.
8
Renewing the Call for Reforms to Medical Device Safety-The Case of Penumbra.再次呼吁改革医疗器械安全——以 Penumbra 为例。
JAMA Intern Med. 2022 Jan 1;182(1):59-65. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2021.6626.
9
Post market surveillance in the german medical device sector - current state and future perspectives.德国医疗器械领域的上市后监督——现状与未来展望
Health Policy. 2017 Aug;121(8):880-886. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2017.06.005. Epub 2017 Jun 24.
10
Ensuring safe and effective medical devices.确保医疗设备的安全与有效。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 16;348(3):191-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp020170.

本文引用的文献

1
Which Health Impacts of Medical Device Adverse Event Should Be Reported Immediately in Korea?在韩国,哪些医疗器械不良事件的健康影响应该立即报告?
J Patient Saf. 2022 Mar 1;18(2):e591-e595. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000877.
2
The establishment of the Korean medical device safety information monitoring center: Reviewing ten years of experience.韩国医疗器械安全信息监测中心的建立:回顾十年经验。
Health Policy. 2021 Jul;125(7):941-946. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 May 4.
3
Assessment of Data Sources That Support US Food and Drug Administration Medical Devices Safety Communications.
支持美国食品和药物管理局医疗器械安全通讯的数据来源评估。
JAMA Intern Med. 2020 Nov 1;180(11):1420-1426. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.3514.
4
Differences in Perspectives of Medical Device Adverse Events: Observational Results in Training Program Using Virtual Cases.医疗器械不良事件观点差异:使用虚拟案例的培训计划中的观察结果。
J Korean Med Sci. 2019 Oct 14;34(39):e255. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2019.34.e255.
5
Postmarket surveillance of medical devices: a comparison of strategies in the US, EU, Japan, and China.医疗器械上市后监测:美国、欧盟、日本和中国的策略比较。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(9):e1001519. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001519. Epub 2013 Sep 24.
6
Independent predictors of revision following metal-on-metal hip resurfacing: a retrospective cohort study using National Joint Registry data.金属对金属髋关节表面置换术后翻修的独立预测因素:一项使用国家关节注册数据的回顾性队列研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jun;94(6):746-54. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B6.29239.
7
Strength of study evidence examined by the FDA in premarket approval of cardiovascular devices.美国食品和药物管理局在心血管设备上市前批准中检查的研究证据的强度。
JAMA. 2009 Dec 23;302(24):2679-85. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1899.
8
Early failure of a small-diameter high-voltage implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead.小直径高压植入式心脏复律除颤器导线的早期故障
Heart Rhythm. 2007 Jul;4(7):892-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.03.041. Epub 2007 Apr 10.
9
Ensuring safe and effective medical devices.确保医疗设备的安全与有效。
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jan 16;348(3):191-2. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp020170.