Suppr超能文献

跨文化验证 DSM-5 儿童和青少年版临床医生管理创伤后应激障碍量表在日本的适用性。

Cross-cultural validation of the Clinician-Administered PTSD scale for DSM-5, child and adolescent version in Japan.

机构信息

Komaba Organization for Educational Excellence, The University of Tokyo, Meguroku, Tokyo, Japan.

Hyogo Institute for Traumatic Stress, Kobe, Japan.

出版信息

Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2424607. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2424607. Epub 2024 Nov 15.

Abstract

The establishment of a formal diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) for children and adolescents is the foundation for advancing pertinent clinical research and formulating proper treatment and management. However, a validated diagnostic tool for PTSD in children and adolescents is lacking in Japan. To examine the cross-cultural validity and reliability of the Japanese Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), child and adolescent version (CAPS-CA-5-J). Overall, 73 children who had experienced potentially traumatic events were recruited from three medical facilities. The linguistically validated CAPS-CA-5-J was conducted by trained psychiatrists and psychologists. Additionally, children and their caretakers completed questionnaires such as the UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5), Depression Self-Rating Scale for Children (DSRDC), and Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ); 16 participants were randomly selected for the inter-rater reliability assessment. Owing to missing values in the CAPS-CA-5-J and PTSD-RI-5, 68 children were included in the final analysis. Regarding reliability, the CAPS-CA-5-J showed excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.90) and interrater agreement (kappa coefficient = 0.88). Convergent validity was supported by a strong correlation between the total severity scale of the CAPS-CA-5-J and the PTSD-RI-5 scores (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.82). Divergent validity was indicated by a moderate correlation between the CAPS-CA-5-J and DSRDC, and no correlation was found with the SDQ scores. This study is the first to validate a structured clinical interview for children and adolescents with PTSD in Japan. The psychometric properties of the CAPS-CA-5-J were good enough and comparable to those reported in previous validation studies. Therefore, the CAPS-CA-5-J can be considered reliable and valid for use in Japan.

摘要

创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)的正式诊断的确立是推进相关临床研究和制定适当治疗和管理的基础。然而,日本缺乏经过验证的儿童和青少年 PTSD 诊断工具。本研究旨在检验《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM-5)儿童和青少年用临床医生管理 PTSD 量表(CAPS-CA-5-J)的跨文化效度和信度。共有 73 名曾经历过潜在创伤性事件的儿童从三家医疗机构招募。由经过培训的精神科医生和心理学家进行语言验证的 CAPS-CA-5-J。此外,儿童及其看护者完成了 UCLA PTSD 反应指数 DSM-5(PTSD-RI-5)、儿童抑郁自评量表(DSRDC)和长处和困难问卷(SDQ)等问卷;16 名参与者被随机选择进行评分者间信度评估。由于 CAPS-CA-5-J 和 PTSD-RI-5 中存在缺失值,最终有 68 名儿童纳入了最终分析。CAPS-CA-5-J 具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha 系数为 0.90)和评分者间一致性(kappa 系数为 0.88),表明其具有良好的可靠性。CAPS-CA-5-J 的总分与 PTSD-RI-5 得分之间具有较强的相关性(Pearson 相关系数为 0.82),支持了其具有良好的聚合效度。CAPS-CA-5-J 与 DSRDC 之间具有中度相关性,与 SDQ 之间无相关性,表明其具有良好的区分效度。本研究是日本首次对 PTSD 儿童和青少年进行的结构化临床访谈的验证。CAPS-CA-5-J 的心理测量特性足够好,与以前的验证研究报告的结果相当。因此,CAPS-CA-5-J 可在日本被认为是可靠和有效的。

相似文献

1
Cross-cultural validation of the Clinician-Administered PTSD scale for DSM-5, child and adolescent version in Japan.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2424607. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2424607. Epub 2024 Nov 15.
2
A diagnostic questionnaire for childbirth related posttraumatic stress disorder: a validation study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul;231(1):134.e1-134.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.11.1229. Epub 2023 Nov 21.
3
Feasibility and psychometric properties of the UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 in japanese youth: A multi-site study.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2018 Mar;33:93-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2018.03.011. Epub 2018 Mar 3.
4
Translation and Validation of the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-CA-5) for Portuguese Children and Adolescents.
Acta Med Port. 2022 Sep 1;35(9):652-662. doi: 10.20344/amp.16718. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
7
Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 in a sample of trauma exposed mental health service users.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jan 26;12(1):1863578. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2020.1863578. eCollection 2021.
10
Psychometric properties of the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Symptom Scale Interview for DSM-5 (PSSI-5).
Psychol Assess. 2016 Oct;28(10):1159-1165. doi: 10.1037/pas0000259. Epub 2015 Dec 21.

本文引用的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Trauma-Informed Pediatric Interventions in Response to Natural and Biologic Disasters.
Children (Basel). 2023 Jun 5;10(6):1017. doi: 10.3390/children10061017.
3
The Prevalence, Patterns and Correlates of Childhood Trauma Exposure in a Nationally Representative Sample of Young People in Northern Ireland.
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2022 May 7;15(4):963-976. doi: 10.1007/s40653-022-00449-2. eCollection 2022 Dec.
4
Translation and Validation of the Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS-CA-5) for Portuguese Children and Adolescents.
Acta Med Port. 2022 Sep 1;35(9):652-662. doi: 10.20344/amp.16718. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
8
UCLA PTSD reaction index for DSM-5 (PTSD-RI-5): a psychometric study of adolescents sampled from communities in eleven countries.
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2019 May 7;10(1):1605282. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2019.1605282. eCollection 2019.
9
Validation of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5: A Developmentally Informed Assessment Tool for Youth.
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.019. Epub 2019 Apr 3.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验