Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.
University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA).
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020 Jan;59(1):186-194. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.10.019. Epub 2019 Apr 3.
To describe the test construction procedure and evaluate the internal consistency, criterion-referenced validity, and diagnostic accuracy of the Child/Adolescent Self-Report Version of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for DSM-5 (RI-5) across 2 independent samples.
Study 1 examined the clarity, developmental appropriateness, acceptability of individual RI-5 items, and internal consistency and criterion-referenced validity of the full test. The study 1 sample included 486 youth recruited from 2 major US cities who completed the RI-5 and a measure of depression. Study 2 evaluated the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the RI-5 in 41 treatment-seeking youth who completed the RI-5 and a "gold standard" structured diagnostic interview, the Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale for DSM-5-Child/Adolescent Version.
RI-5 total scale scores showed excellent internal consistency in the 2 samples. Study 1 provided evidence of criterion-referenced validity, in that total scale scores correlated positively with depressive symptoms. Study 2 provided evidence of diagnostic accuracy (including discriminant-groups validity). RI-5 total scores discriminated youth with from youth without PTSD as benchmarked against the structured diagnostic interview. Further, receiver operating characteristic analyses using a total score of 35 provided excellent diagnostic classification accuracy (area under the curve 0.94).
The developmental appropriateness and diagnostic accuracy of the RI-5 support its utility for clinical assessment, case conceptualization, and treatment planning in different child-serving systems, including schools, juvenile justice, child welfare, and mental health.
描述儿童/青少年 UCLA PTSD 反应指数 DSM-5 自我报告版本(RI-5)的测试构建过程,并评估其在两个独立样本中的内部一致性、效标参照效度和诊断准确性。
研究 1 考察了 RI-5 各项目的清晰度、发展适宜性、可接受性以及全测验的内部一致性和效标参照效度。研究 1 样本包括来自美国两个主要城市的 486 名青少年,他们完成了 RI-5 和一项抑郁测量。研究 2 在 41 名接受治疗的青少年中评估了 RI-5 的可靠性和诊断准确性,他们完成了 RI-5 和“黄金标准”结构化诊断访谈,即 DSM-5-儿童/青少年版临床医生管理 PTSD 量表。
RI-5 的总量表分数在两个样本中表现出极好的内部一致性。研究 1 提供了效标参照效度的证据,即总量表分数与抑郁症状呈正相关。研究 2 提供了诊断准确性的证据(包括判别组有效性)。RI-5 总得分可区分 PTSD 患者与非 PTSD 患者,与结构化诊断访谈相比具有良好的诊断分类准确性(曲线下面积 0.94)。
RI-5 的发展适宜性和诊断准确性支持其在不同儿童服务系统(包括学校、少年司法、儿童福利和心理健康)中的临床评估、病例概念化和治疗计划中的应用。