King Abdullah Ear Specialist Center (KAESC), King Saud Medical City, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Research Department, MED-EL GmbH, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 15;19(11):e0313567. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313567. eCollection 2024.
Anatomy-based fitting (ABF) for cochlear implant users is a new era that seeks improved outcomes. Recently, different imaging modalities, such as plain X-rays, have been proposed to build the ABF as an alternative to the computed tomography (CT) scan. This study aimed to assess the feasibility and validity of OTOPLAN® software in building ABF using plain X-ray imaging.
A retrospective evaluation of postoperative CT scans and plain X-ray post-op images of 54 patients was analyzed using the OTOPLAN® software. The post-op analysis was done for the angular insertion depth (AID) and center frequency of each electrode contact using both imaging modalities. Moreover, inter-rater reliability was assessed for measurements obtained from CT scans and plain X-ray images.
Non-significant statistical and clinical mismatches were detected when comparing the AID and center frequency measurements assessed using CT and X-rays. The absolute difference between CT and X-ray approaches ranged from 0.0 to 4.6 degrees for AID and 0.2 to 0.5 semitone for frequency. Moreover, the AID and the frequency measurements from CT and X-ray images demonstrated almost perfect agreement between the raters. The inter-observer reliability for CT scans showed that the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) exceeded 0.97 for AID and 0.95 for the frequency across all electrode contacts.
Our results demonstrated the validity and reliability of using post-operative X-ray images by OTOPLAN® software to build Anatomy-based Fitting maps.
基于解剖结构的拟合(ABF)是为耳蜗植入用户开启的一个新时代,旨在寻求更好的效果。最近,人们提出了不同的成像方式,如普通 X 射线,以替代计算机断层扫描(CT)来构建 ABF。本研究旨在评估 OTOPLAN®软件在使用普通 X 射线成像构建 ABF 方面的可行性和有效性。
回顾性分析了 54 例患者的术后 CT 扫描和普通 X 射线术后图像,使用 OTOPLAN®软件进行分析。使用两种成像方式对每个电极接触的角插入深度(AID)和中心频率进行术后分析。此外,还评估了从 CT 扫描和普通 X 射线图像获得的测量值的组内相关性。
当比较使用 CT 和 X 射线评估的 AID 和中心频率测量值时,未发现统计学和临床显著差异。AID 的 CT 和 X 射线方法之间的绝对差值范围为 0.0 至 4.6 度,频率的绝对差值范围为 0.2 至 0.5 半音。此外,CT 和 X 射线图像的 AID 和频率测量值在评估者之间几乎完全一致。CT 扫描的观察者间可靠性表明,AID 的组内相关系数(ICC)超过 0.97,所有电极接触的频率 ICC 超过 0.95。
我们的结果证明了使用术后 X 射线图像通过 OTOPLAN®软件构建基于解剖结构的拟合图谱的有效性和可靠性。