Suppr超能文献

Comparison between auditory brain stem responses evoked by rarefaction and condensation step functions and clicks.

作者信息

Tietze G, Pantev C

出版信息

Audiology. 1986;25(1):44-53. doi: 10.3109/00206098609078368.

Abstract

In order to evaluate the influence of the trailing edge of clicks on the auditory brain stem response (ABR) in normal ears, rarefaction and condensation step functions (RS and CS) compared to rarefaction and condensation clicks (RC and CC) at an intensity of 70 dB nHL were used. Significant intraindividual differences could be found for the latencies and amplitudes in the RS-CS, RS-RC and RC-CC comparison. However, the mean values of the complete group of test subjects showed no significant differences for the latencies and amplitudes, except the significantly greater amplitudes of wave I and II for R versus C step and R versus C click. Only a tendency to shorter latency for wave VI with R versus C step and click was revealed. These results show that there was no essential influence of the trailing edge of the used R and C clicks on the ABR. The latency of the ABR with excitation of the cochlea by step or click function seemed to be mainly determined by the internal oscillation sequence in the cochlea and not by the stimulus polarity.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验