Kileny P
Audiology. 1986;25(1):62-4.
This article contains critical comments on data described in a recent paper dealing with differences between click- and tone-pip-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) by Maurizi et al. [Audiology 23: 75-84, 1984]. The primary criticism relates to the lack of validity of comparing ABR obtained with different input filter settings. When utilizing identical input filter settings, click- and tone-pip-evoked brainstem responses exhibit similar morphologies: both consist of a slow vertex-positive wave with faster superimposed vertex-positive components.
本文包含对Maurizi等人[《听力学》23: 75 - 84, 1984]近期一篇关于短声和短纯音诱发听性脑干反应(ABR)差异的论文中所描述数据的批判性评论。主要批评意见涉及比较在不同输入滤波器设置下获得的ABR的有效性不足。当使用相同的输入滤波器设置时,短声和短纯音诱发的脑干反应呈现出相似的形态:两者均由一个缓慢的顶点正向波以及更快的叠加顶点正向成分组成。