Department of Psychology, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St. Catharines, ON, L2S 3A1, Canada.
Psychol Res. 2024 Nov 15;89(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02034-8.
When irrelevant stimuli are processed and then bound to relevant stimuli in memory, it is known as hyper-binding. Hyper-binding has been demonstrated consistently in older-aged participants, but university-aged participants do not typically show hyper-binding. This phenomenon has been attributed to older individuals having greater difficulty filtering out irrelevant information compared to younger adults. Emotions can also influence how individuals attend to and process information, and older individuals report feeling greater positive, and less negative, affect than younger adults. Low arousal positive affect is associated with greater cognitive breadth and reduced distractor suppression. Therefore, it is possible that differences in affect contribute to the differences in hyper-binding demonstrated for younger versus older adults. In four studies, we measured hyper-binding using a standard hyper-binding task and examined whether individual differences in hyper-binding could be predicted by individual differences in self-reported affect. Study 1 included an online community sample between 18 and 45 years of age. Study 2 included university undergraduate students that were tested online. Study 3 participants included university undergraduate students that were tested in the lab. Study 4 participants included an older aged sample that was tested online. Overall, there were no significant relationships between affect and hyper-binding across age samples. Surprisingly, however, significant hyper-binding was observed for all age groups and was not larger for older individuals. The results suggest that individual differences in naturally occurring affect do not meaningfully predict hyper-binding, but the prevalence of hyper-binding across all studies demonstrates it may not be unique to older adults.
当无关刺激被处理并随后与记忆中的相关刺激结合时,就称为超绑定。超绑定在老年参与者中得到了一致的证明,但大学生参与者通常不会表现出超绑定。这种现象归因于与年轻人相比,老年人更难以过滤掉无关信息。情绪也会影响个体如何注意和处理信息,而且老年人比年轻人报告感到更大的积极情绪,更少的消极情绪。低唤醒积极情绪与更大的认知广度和减少分心抑制有关。因此,情绪差异可能导致年轻人和老年人在超绑定方面的差异。在四项研究中,我们使用标准的超绑定任务测量超绑定,并研究个体报告的情绪差异是否可以预测超绑定的个体差异。研究 1 包括年龄在 18 至 45 岁之间的在线社区样本。研究 2 包括在线测试的大学生本科生。研究 3 的参与者包括在实验室测试的大学生本科生。研究 4 的参与者包括在线测试的老年样本。总的来说,在年龄样本中,情绪与超绑定之间没有显著关系。然而,令人惊讶的是,所有年龄组都观察到了显著的超绑定,而老年人的超绑定并不更大。结果表明,自然发生的情绪个体差异并没有显著预测超绑定,但所有研究中普遍存在的超绑定表明它可能不是老年人所独有的。