• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大环内酯类药物作为β-内酰胺类药物治疗社区获得性肺炎附加疗法的有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Effectiveness of macrolides as add-on therapy to beta-lactams in community-acquired pneumonia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

作者信息

Prizão Vitória Martins, Martins Otavio Cosendey, de Hollanda Morais Beatriz Austregésilo de Athayde, Mendes Beatriz Ximenes, Defante Maria Luiza Rodrigues, de Moura Souza Mariana

机构信息

Department of Medicine, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.

Department of Medicine, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, Brazil.

出版信息

Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;81(1):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03775-6. Epub 2024 Nov 18.

DOI:10.1007/s00228-024-03775-6
PMID:39551892
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aims to evaluate whether adding macrolides (MAC) to beta-lactam (BL) monotherapy in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) offers clinical benefits that justify the potential disadvantages or side effects.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing BL monotherapy to combination therapy with BL and MAC for the in-hospital treatment of CAP. We pooled mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes and risk ratio (RR) for binary outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Six RCTs with 2661 participants (52% receiving combination therapy), revealed no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.78 to 1.25; p = 0.94; I2 = 0%), 90-day mortality (RR 1.03; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.29; p = 0.83; I2 = 13%), or 30-day mortality (RR 0.90; 75% CI 0.63 to 1.29; p = 0.58; I2 = 54%). Additionally, no significant differences were observed in the length of hospital stay (MD 0.51; 95% CI - 0.50 to 1.51; p = 0.33; I2 = 63%) or respiratory insufficiency (RR 0.63; 95% CI 0.29 to 1.35; p = 0.24; I2 = 74%). However, combination therapy significantly improved the treatment success rate (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.32; p = 0.009; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that BL + MAC therapy should not be used in all cases of hospitalized patients with CAP.

PROSPERO ID

CRD42024516383 - Data of registration: 03/03/2024.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在社区获得性肺炎(CAP)治疗中,在β-内酰胺(BL)单药治疗基础上加用大环内酯类药物(MAC)是否能带来临床益处,以证明其潜在的不利因素或副作用是合理的。

方法

我们系统检索了PubMed、Embase和Cochrane数据库,以查找比较BL单药治疗与BL联合MAC治疗用于CAP住院治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。我们汇总了连续结局的平均差(MD)和二分类结局的风险比(RR),并给出95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

六项RCT共纳入2661名参与者(52%接受联合治疗),结果显示在院内死亡率(RR 0.99;95%CI 0.78至1.25;p = 0.94;I² = 0%)、90天死亡率(RR 1.03;95%CI 0.82至1.29;p = 0.83;I² = 13%)或30天死亡率(RR 0.90;75%CI 0.63至1.29;p = 0.58;I² = 54%)方面无显著差异。此外,在住院时间(MD 0.51;95%CI -0.50至1.51;p = 0.33;I² = 63%)或呼吸功能不全(RR 0.63;95%CI 0.29至1.35;p = 0.24;I² = 74%)方面也未观察到显著差异。然而,联合治疗显著提高了治疗成功率(RR 1.17;95%CI 1.04至1.32;p = 0.009;I² = 0%)。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,BL + MAC治疗不应在所有住院CAP患者中使用。

PROSPERO注册号:CRD42024516383 - 注册日期:2024年3月3日。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of macrolides as add-on therapy to beta-lactams in community-acquired pneumonia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.大环内酯类药物作为β-内酰胺类药物治疗社区获得性肺炎附加疗法的有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2025 Jan;81(1):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s00228-024-03775-6. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
2
Fluoroquinolones or macrolides alone versus combined with β-lactams for adults with community-acquired pneumonia: Systematic review and meta-analysis.氟喹诺酮类或大环内酯类单药与β-内酰胺类联合治疗成人社区获得性肺炎:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015 Sep;46(3):242-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
3
Clinical failure with and without empiric atypical bacteria coverage in hospitalized adults with community-acquired pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.社区获得性肺炎住院成人患者接受与未接受经验性非典型细菌覆盖时的临床失败情况:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2017 Jun 2;17(1):385. doi: 10.1186/s12879-017-2495-5.
4
Is β-Lactam Plus Macrolide More Effective than β-Lactam Plus Fluoroquinolone among Patients with Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia?: a Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.在重症社区获得性肺炎患者中,β-内酰胺类药物联合大环内酯类药物是否比β-内酰胺类药物联合氟喹诺酮类药物更有效?一项系统评价与Meta分析
J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Jan;32(1):77-84. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2017.32.1.77.
5
The order of administration of macrolides and beta-lactams may impact the outcomes of hospitalized patients with community-acquired pneumonia: results from the community-acquired pneumonia organization.大环内酯类药物和β-内酰胺类药物的给药顺序可能会影响社区获得性肺炎住院患者的结局:来自社区获得性肺炎组织的研究结果。
Infect Dis (Lond). 2018 Jan;50(1):13-20. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2017.1350881. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
6
β-Lactam/macrolide dual therapy versus β-lactam monotherapy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.β-内酰胺/大环内酯类双联治疗与β-内酰胺单药治疗成人社区获得性肺炎的疗效比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2014 Jun;69(6):1441-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku033. Epub 2014 Feb 16.
7
Comparative Efficacy of Beta-Lactams and Macrolides in the Treatment of Pediatric Pneumonia: A Systematic Review.β-内酰胺类和大环内酯类药物治疗儿童肺炎的疗效比较:系统评价。
Curr Pediatr Rev. 2020;16(4):307-313. doi: 10.2174/1573396316666200907115800.
8
Comparison of beta-lactam and macrolide combination therapy versus fluoroquinolone monotherapy in hospitalized Veterans Affairs patients with community-acquired pneumonia.退伍军人事务部住院社区获得性肺炎患者中β-内酰胺类与大环内酯类联合治疗与氟喹诺酮类单药治疗的比较
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Nov;51(11):3977-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00006-07. Epub 2007 Aug 20.
9
Comparison of Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Regimens for Hospitalized, Non-severe Community-acquired Pneumonia: A Retrospective, Multicenter Cohort Study.住院非重症社区获得性肺炎经验性抗生素治疗方案的比较:一项回顾性、多中心队列研究。
Clin Ther. 2024 Apr;46(4):338-344. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Feb 24.
10
Effect of β-Lactam Plus Macrolide Versus Fluoroquinolone on 30-Day Readmissions for Community-Acquired Pneumonia.β-内酰胺类联合大环内酯类与氟喹诺酮类药物对社区获得性肺炎 30 天再入院的影响。
Am J Ther. 2020 Mar/Apr;27(2):e177-e182. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000788.

本文引用的文献

1
Clarithromycin for early anti-inflammatory responses in community-acquired pneumonia in Greece (ACCESS): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.克拉霉素治疗希腊社区获得性肺炎的早期抗炎反应(ACCESS):一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Lancet Respir Med. 2024 Apr;12(4):294-304. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00412-5. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
2
Clinical, economic, and humanistic burden of community acquired pneumonia in Europe: a systematic literature review.欧洲社区获得性肺炎的临床、经济和人文负担:一项系统文献综述
Expert Rev Vaccines. 2023 Jan-Dec;22(1):876-884. doi: 10.1080/14760584.2023.2261785. Epub 2023 Oct 13.
3
Detecting the skewness of data from the five-number summary and its application in meta-analysis.
从五数概括中检测数据的偏度及其在荟萃分析中的应用。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Jul;32(7):1338-1360. doi: 10.1177/09622802231172043. Epub 2023 May 10.
4
Prevalence of atypical pathogens in patients with severe pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.严重肺炎患者中非典型病原体的流行情况:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2023 Apr 11;13(4):e066721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066721.
5
ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of severe community-acquired pneumonia.ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT 指南:严重社区获得性肺炎管理。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jun;49(6):615-632. doi: 10.1007/s00134-023-07033-8. Epub 2023 Apr 4.
6
Atypical Pathogens in Adult Community-Acquired Pneumonia and Implications for Empiric Antibiotic Treatment: A Narrative Review.成人社区获得性肺炎中的非典型病原体及其对经验性抗生素治疗的影响:叙述性综述
Microorganisms. 2022 Nov 24;10(12):2326. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms10122326.
7
Empirical antibiotic treatment strategies for community-acquired pneumonia: a network meta-analysis.社区获得性肺炎的经验性抗生素治疗策略:一项网络荟萃分析。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2022 Sep;30:1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 26.
8
Usefulness of β-lactam and macrolide combination therapy for treating community-acquired pneumonia patients hospitalized in the intensive care unit: Propensity score analysis of a prospective cohort study.β-内酰胺类和大环内酯类联合治疗在重症监护病房住院的社区获得性肺炎患者中的作用:一项前瞻性队列研究的倾向评分分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2021 Oct;27(10):1447-1453. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2021.06.003. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
9
Optimally estimating the sample standard deviation from the five-number summary.最优估计五数概括的样本标准差。
Res Synth Methods. 2020 Sep;11(5):641-654. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1429. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
10
Clinical prognostic significance of serum high mobility group box-1 protein in patients with community-acquired pneumonia.血清高迁移率族蛋白B1在社区获得性肺炎患者中的临床预后意义
J Int Med Res. 2019 Mar;47(3):1232-1240. doi: 10.1177/0300060518819381. Epub 2019 Feb 7.