• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

定义最佳嗜碱性粒细胞被动致敏参数。

Defining Optimal Basophil Passive Sensitisation Parameters.

作者信息

Alvarez-Arango Santiago, Dispenza Melanie C, Chichester Kristin L, MacGlashan Donald W

机构信息

Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine and Pharmacology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Jan;55(1):75-83. doi: 10.1111/cea.14594. Epub 2024 Nov 17.

DOI:10.1111/cea.14594
PMID:39552263
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Detecting drug-specific IgE (sIgE) is crucial for diagnosing immediate drug-induced hypersensitivity reactions. Basophil activation tests serve as a method to determine the presence of drug-sIgE, highlighting the importance of optimising the assay. Optimisation involves considering multiple factors to ensure sensitisation helps detect an antigen sIgE. The study investigates the complex factors influencing basophil responsiveness thresholds and aims to provide rules-of-thumb guidance for expected results.

METHODS

Open and occupied FcεRI receptors were analysed by flow cytometry pre- and postdissociation of surface-bound sIgE. Basophils were then sensitised with serial concentrations of penicillin (BPO)-sIgE in serum or buffer and incubated for 1, 4 and 18 h with or without DO and/or IL-3. Basophil sensitivity was evaluated based on FcεRI receptor densities, sIgE/total IgE (tIgE) ratios, responses to BPO(21)-HSA, and DO and/or IL-3 effects, with maximal responses determined using anti-IgE human antibodies. These optimised conditions were tested with peanut-sIgE and cat-sIgE sera.

RESULTS

Basophils from five donors were used. The FcεRI receptor expression initially averaged 155,000/cell (47,000-344,000/cell), with 35% (5%-79%) unoccupied, which postdissociation increased to 98% (82%-100%) unoccupied. Upon sensitisation, the average reloading with BPO-sIgE was 39% (33%-48%). The ED (a measure of cellular sensitivity) was approx. 6000 BPO-sIgE/cell, and the average maximal anti-IgE antibody response was 58% (25%-68%). A 4-h sensitisation at 4°C with IL-3 pretreatment and 70% DO allowed the detection of BPO-sIgE/tIgE ratios as low as 0.02%-0.05% without spontaneous histamine release. Under the same conditions, responses were detected with 0.33% peanut-sIgE and 0.1% cat-sIgE ratios.

CONCLUSION

This study outlines a method to assess basophil sensitisation, emphasising the minimum sIgE/tIgE ratio needed for basophil responsiveness. It considers factors like FcεRI open/unoccupied FcεRI receptors, sIgE/tIgE ratios and the effect of DO and IL-3. This sets a strong foundation for refining and advancing basophil activation functional assays.

摘要

背景

检测药物特异性IgE(sIgE)对于诊断速发型药物性过敏反应至关重要。嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验是确定药物sIgE存在的一种方法,凸显了优化该检测方法的重要性。优化涉及考虑多个因素,以确保致敏有助于检测抗原sIgE。本研究调查了影响嗜碱性粒细胞反应阈值的复杂因素,旨在为预期结果提供经验法则指导。

方法

通过流式细胞术分析表面结合的sIgE解离前后开放和占据的FcεRI受体。然后用血清或缓冲液中系列浓度的青霉素(BPO)-sIgE使嗜碱性粒细胞致敏,并在有或没有地塞米松(DO)和/或白细胞介素-3(IL-3)的情况下孵育1、4和18小时。基于FcεRI受体密度、sIgE/总IgE(tIgE)比值、对BPO(21)-人血清白蛋白(HSA)的反应以及DO和/或IL-3的作用评估嗜碱性粒细胞敏感性,使用抗IgE人抗体确定最大反应。用花生-sIgE和猫-sIgE血清测试这些优化条件。

结果

使用了来自五名供体的嗜碱性粒细胞。FcεRI受体表达最初平均为155,000/细胞(47,000 - 344,000/细胞),其中35%(5% - 79%)未被占据,解离后未被占据的比例增加到98%(82% - 100%)。致敏后,BPO-sIgE的平均重新加载量为39%(33% - 48%)。半数有效剂量(衡量细胞敏感性的指标)约为6000 BPO-sIgE/细胞,平均最大抗IgE抗体反应为58%(25% - 68%)。在4°C下用IL-3预处理和70% DO进行4小时致敏,可检测到低至0.02% - 0.05%的BPO-sIgE/tIgE比值,且无自发组胺释放。在相同条件下,可检测到0.33%花生-sIgE和0.1%猫-sIgE比值的反应。

结论

本研究概述了一种评估嗜碱性粒细胞致敏性的方法,强调了嗜碱性粒细胞反应所需的最低sIgE/tIgE比值。它考虑了诸如FcεRI开放/未占据的FcεRI受体、sIgE/tIgE比值以及DO和IL-3的作用等因素。这为完善和推进嗜碱性粒细胞活化功能检测奠定了坚实基础。

相似文献

1
Defining Optimal Basophil Passive Sensitisation Parameters.定义最佳嗜碱性粒细胞被动致敏参数。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Jan;55(1):75-83. doi: 10.1111/cea.14594. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
2
Response of peripheral blood basophils in subjects with chronic spontaneous urticaria during treatment with omalizumab.奥马珠单抗治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹患者外周血嗜碱性粒细胞的反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun;147(6):2295-2304.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.02.039. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
3
The efficacy of omalizumab treatment in chronic spontaneous urticaria is associated with basophil phenotypes.奥马珠单抗治疗慢性自发性荨麻疹的疗效与嗜碱性粒细胞表型相关。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jun;147(6):2271-2280.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.02.038. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
4
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
5
Basophils induce protumorigenic cytokines from A549 lung adenocarcinoma via mechanisms requiring IgE, galectin-3, and IL-3 priming.嗜碱性粒细胞通过需要IgE、半乳糖凝集素-3和白细胞介素-3启动的机制诱导A549肺腺癌产生促肿瘤细胞因子。
J Leukoc Biol. 2025 Mar 14;117(3). doi: 10.1093/jleuko/qiae233.
6
Diagnostic accuracy of specific IgE to components in diagnosing peanut allergy: a systematic review.特异性IgE针对花生过敏诊断中各成分的诊断准确性:一项系统评价
Clin Exp Allergy. 2015 Apr;45(4):720-30. doi: 10.1111/cea.12412.
7
Characterization of the clinical relevance and hypoallergenic peptides of the newly evidenced major allergen Hum j 1.新证实的主要过敏原Hum j 1的临床相关性及低致敏性肽的特性分析
Front Immunol. 2025 Jun 23;16:1588870. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1588870. eCollection 2025.
8
Integrated Diagnostic Approach Using Basophil Activation Test and IgE Assays for Shrimp and Prawn Allergy.使用嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验和IgE检测对虾类过敏进行综合诊断的方法
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 5;61(6):1040. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061040.
9
Towards an Optimal Decision Threshold for Specific IgE to rCan s 3 the Non-Specific Lipid Transfer Protein of Cannabis sativa.确定大麻非特异性脂质转移蛋白rCan s 3特异性IgE的最佳决策阈值
Clin Exp Allergy. 2025 Jul 29. doi: 10.1111/cea.70122.
10
Omalizumab for asthma in adults and children.奥马珠单抗用于成人和儿童哮喘治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jan 13;2014(1):CD003559. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003559.pub4.