Nascimento Allen Matheus S, Ardestani Soraya S, Novaes Isabela C, Conti Paulo César R, Bonjardim Leonardo R, Exposto Fernando G, Svensson Peter, Costa Yuri M
Department of Biosciences, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba (FOP), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Department of Periodontology and Prosthodontics, Faculdade de Odontologia de Piracicaba (FOP), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Eur J Pain. 2025 Mar;29(3):e4747. doi: 10.1002/ejp.4747. Epub 2024 Nov 17.
This study assessed the effect of expectation of analgesia on conditioned pain modulation (CPM) in healthy participants stratified into inhibitors and non-inhibitors.
A parallel CPM protocol was assessed on 21 women and 22 men across two sessions: baseline and expectation of analgesia, which was induced by a standardized audiovisual suggestion. The CPM assessment involved two different test stimuli (TS): mechanically controlled palpation and the pressure pain threshold, applied to two different regions: anterior temporalis and thenar eminence of the hand. The conditioning stimulus (CS) involved immersing the non-dominant forearm in cold water. The order of the TS and regions was randomized for each participant. The CPM protocol was performed three times, with a 1-min interval between TS/region sequences. After a 20-min rest, the CPM assessment was repeated (two blocks in total). The standard error of measurement (SEM) was computed to identify inhibitors (inhibitory responses) and non-inhibitors (including non-inhibitors and facilitatory responses). Cochran's Q, ANOVA and ANCOVA were applied to the data (p < 0.05).
There was a significant decrease in the proportion of non-inhibitors during the expectation of analgesia session (32.6%-44.2%) when compared with the baseline session (51.2%-72.1%). The non-inhibitors exhibited a lower inhibitory CPM magnitude than the inhibitors only in block 1 of the baseline session. The expectation of analgesia resulted in an increased magnitude of the inhibitory CPM solely in non-inhibitors.
Expectation of analgesia can increase the inhibitory response of the CPM beyond the measurement error in healthy participants with a baseline non-inhibitory profile.
Several studies have investigated whether cognitive modulation can alter the magnitude of the inhibitory response of conditioned pain modulation (CPM), yet some gaps remain. This study accounted for measurement error to accurately determine changes in CPM influenced by expectation of analgesia.
本研究评估了镇痛预期对健康参与者条件性疼痛调制(CPM)的影响,这些参与者被分为抑制者和非抑制者。
对21名女性和22名男性进行了一项平行CPM方案,分两个阶段进行:基线阶段和由标准化视听暗示诱导的镇痛预期阶段。CPM评估涉及两种不同的测试刺激(TS):机械控制触诊和压力痛阈,应用于两个不同的区域:颞前部和手部鱼际隆起。条件刺激(CS)包括将非优势前臂浸入冷水中。每个参与者的TS和区域顺序是随机的。CPM方案进行了三次,TS/区域序列之间间隔1分钟。休息20分钟后,重复CPM评估(共两个模块)。计算测量标准误差(SEM)以识别抑制者(抑制性反应)和非抑制者(包括非抑制者和易化性反应)。对数据应用 Cochr an Q检验、方差分析和协方差分析(p < 0.05)。
与基线阶段(51.2%-72.1%)相比,在镇痛预期阶段,非抑制者的比例显著下降(32.6%-44.2%)。仅在基线阶段的模块1中,非抑制者的抑制性CPM幅度低于抑制者。镇痛预期仅在非抑制者中导致抑制性CPM幅度增加。
在基线无抑制特征的健康参与者中,镇痛预期可使CPM的抑制性反应增加超过测量误差。
多项研究探讨了认知调制是否能改变条件性疼痛调制(CPM)的抑制性反应幅度,但仍存在一些空白。本研究考虑了测量误差,以准确确定受镇痛预期影响的CPM变化。