Suppr超能文献

健康志愿者中重复条件性疼痛调制的效果。

Effects of repeated conditioning pain modulation in healthy volunteers.

机构信息

Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), SMI, Aalborg University, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Pain. 2018 Nov;22(10):1833-1843. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1279. Epub 2018 Jul 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) may be impaired in chronic pain patients compared with healthy subjects. The CPM-effect is the difference between pain sensitivity assessments (test-stimuli) with and without a painful conditioning stimulus. CPM has been extensively explored but effects of repeated CPM-effects and differences between repeated CPM assessments and comparable control conditions are less studied.

METHODS

In 20 healthy men, four 5-min bouts with a test-stimulus in the beginning and midway were applied by cuff-algometry to the dominant leg. The 2nd test-stimulus in each bout was conditioned in parallel by a painful cuff pressure on the contralateral leg. A control-session was performed without conditioning. The conditioning intensity was 70% of the pressure-pain tolerance threshold (PTT) assessed at baseline. Pain detection threshold (PDT) was extracted from test-stimuli. CPM/Control-effects were calculated as second minus first test-stimulus, and netCPM-effects were calculated as the difference between CPM-effects and Control-effects.

RESULTS

Pain detection threshold increased in all four bouts (p < 0.02) compared to the unconditioned test-stimulus and compared to the 2nd test-stimulus in bout1, bout3 and bout4 of the control-session (p < 0.04). In the control-session, the 1st test-stimulus PDT increased from bout1 to bout2, bout3 and bout4 (p < 0.03). The netCPM-effect increased progressively over the four bouts (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

Conditioned pain modulation-effects were maintained over four consecutive bouts and in the control-session repeated pain thresholds assessments habituated more than in the CPM-session leading to an increase in netCPM-effect over the four bouts.

SIGNIFICANCE

Conditioning pain modulation can be assessed in 5-min intervals by cuff algometry with a fixed conditioning stimulus. Without applying conditioning stimuli the pain sensitivity of test-stimuli habituated. As a consequence, it can be speculated that the conditioning stimulus may negate the temporal habituation effects during repeated sessions, whereas this may not be the case for unconditioned stimuli. Applying both conditioned and unconditioned repeated test-stimuli may be a way to assess different parts of the pain modulatory system, and a model for measuring a netCPM-effect, which could indicate a balance between habituation and sensitization, is proposed.

摘要

背景

与健康受试者相比,慢性疼痛患者的条件疼痛调制(CPM)可能受损。CPM 效应是在有和没有疼痛条件刺激的情况下进行疼痛敏感评估(测试刺激)之间的差异。CPM 已经得到了广泛的研究,但重复 CPM 效应的影响以及重复 CPM 评估与可比对照条件之间的差异研究较少。

方法

在 20 名健康男性中,通过袖带测压仪在优势腿上进行了四个 5 分钟的回合,每个回合的开始和中途都有一个测试刺激。第二个测试刺激在每个回合中与对侧腿上的疼痛袖带压力并行条件化。进行了对照会话而没有条件化。条件强度为基线时压力疼痛耐受阈值(PTT)的 70%。从测试刺激中提取疼痛检测阈值(PDT)。CPM/对照效应计算为第二个减去第一个测试刺激,净 CPM 效应计算为 CPM 效应与对照效应之间的差异。

结果

与未经条件刺激的测试刺激相比,所有四个回合的疼痛检测阈值均增加(p<0.02),与对照会话中回合 1、回合 3 和回合 4 的第二个测试刺激相比,疼痛检测阈值也增加(p<0.04)。在对照会话中,第一个测试刺激的 PDT 从回合 1 增加到回合 2、回合 3 和回合 4(p<0.03)。随着四个回合的进展,净 CPM 效应逐渐增加(p=0.03)。

结论

在四个连续回合中,条件疼痛调制效应得以维持,在对照会话中,重复疼痛阈值评估比 CPM 会话更容易习惯,从而导致四个回合中净 CPM 效应增加。

意义

通过袖带测压仪以固定的条件刺激,在 5 分钟的间隔内可以评估条件疼痛调制。如果不施加条件刺激,则测试刺激的疼痛敏感性会习惯。因此,可以推测条件刺激可能会在重复的会话中消除时间习惯效应,而这对于未条件刺激则不然。应用条件和未条件的重复测试刺激可能是评估疼痛调制系统不同部分的一种方法,并且提出了一种测量净 CPM 效应的模型,该模型可以指示习惯和敏感化之间的平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验