Abraham Siju V, Paul Sarah, Mathew Deo, Rajeev Punchalil Chathappan, Paul Martin V, Davis Clint
Department of Emergency Medicine, Jubilee Mission Medical College and Research Institute, Thrissur, Kerala, India.
National Oral Health Program, Centre for Dental Education and Research, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Wilderness Environ Med. 2025 Mar;36(1):76-88. doi: 10.1177/10806032241290800. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
India has a high incidence of snakebite-related mortality, making effective snakebite management crucial. This study aimed to explore current practices, challenges, and opportunities for improvement in snakebite management across India.
A cross-sectional survey was conducted among physicians in India covering aspects such as scope of practice, snake identification, first aid measures, institutional management, and specific management practices for hump-nosed pit viper () bites. The survey included 37 questions across 5 sections, with data collected via emails, professional networks, and online platforms. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS Statistics 23 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY), and manual thematic analysis was applied to open-ended responses.
The survey revealed a discrepancy between physicians' confidence and accuracy in snake identification, with some still reporting outdated first aid and treatment practices. Despite recognizing the importance of snake species identification, a significant portion of respondents incorrectly identified the snakes. The study highlighted variability in institutional practices for snakebite management, such as administering prophylactic antibiotics and tetanus prophylaxis and monitoring periods for asymptomatic patients. In managing viper bites, a demand for specific guidelines and a monovalent antivenom was evident because the current polyvalent antivenom is ineffective for this species.
The survey emphasizes the need for improved training in snake identification, standardized treatment protocols, and the development of region-specific antivenoms. It emphasizes the necessity of updating guidelines to address the unique challenges of snakebite management in India, particularly for species not covered by existing antivenoms.
印度蛇咬伤相关死亡率很高,因此有效的蛇咬伤管理至关重要。本研究旨在探讨印度全国蛇咬伤管理的当前做法、挑战及改进机会。
对印度的医生进行了一项横断面调查,内容包括执业范围、蛇类识别、急救措施、机构管理以及尖吻蝮咬伤的具体管理做法等方面。该调查涵盖5个部分的37个问题,通过电子邮件、专业网络和在线平台收集数据。使用SPSS Statistics 23(IBM公司,纽约州阿蒙克)进行统计分析,并对开放式回答进行手动主题分析。
调查显示医生在蛇类识别方面的信心与准确性之间存在差异,一些医生仍报告过时的急救和治疗做法。尽管认识到蛇种识别的重要性,但很大一部分受访者错误地识别了蛇类。该研究强调了蛇咬伤管理机构做法的差异,如使用预防性抗生素和破伤风预防措施以及对无症状患者的监测期。在处理尖吻蝮咬伤时,对特定指南和单价抗蛇毒血清的需求明显,因为目前的多价抗蛇毒血清对该物种无效。
该调查强调需要改进蛇类识别培训、标准化治疗方案以及开发针对特定地区的抗蛇毒血清。它强调了更新指南以应对印度蛇咬伤管理独特挑战的必要性,特别是针对现有抗蛇毒血清未涵盖的物种。