Shah Anne, Apple Jon, Burgos Gabriela, Lankin Josh, Cohn Jesse, Mulvihill Emily, Cambron-Mellott M Janelle
AstraZeneca, One MedImmune Way, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, USA.
Oracle Life Sciences, Oracle Corporation, World Headquarters, 2300 Oracle Way, Austin, TX 78741, USA.
Future Oncol. 2024 Dec;20(39):3229-3243. doi: 10.1080/14796694.2024.2419351. Epub 2024 Nov 18.
To understand physicians' attitudes and behaviors regarding EGFR testing and retesting strategies in newly diagnosed metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients. Oncologists and pathologists completed an online, cross-sectional survey. Most oncologists (73.3%) and pathologists (53.4%) agreed that concurrent testing increases sensitivity for detecting EGFR mutations. Upon tissue insufficiency, oncologists and pathologists reported using liquid biopsy 77.0% and 39.0% of the time, respectively. Tumor accessibility, smoking status, patient willingness and age were key drivers of tissue re-biopsy. Most oncologists reported high confidence in proceeding to first-line therapy based solely on liquid biopsy (60.7-80.0%); fewer pathologists (37.9%) were comfortable with this decision. Variation in physicians' perceptions of testing and retesting highlights the need for greater stakeholder consensus.
为了解医生对新诊断的转移性非小细胞肺癌患者表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)检测及重新检测策略的态度和行为。肿瘤学家和病理学家完成了一项在线横断面调查。大多数肿瘤学家(73.3%)和病理学家(53.4%)一致认为同步检测可提高检测EGFR突变的敏感性。在组织样本不足时,肿瘤学家和病理学家分别报告77.0%和39.0%的情况下会使用液体活检。肿瘤的可获取性、吸烟状况、患者意愿和年龄是组织重新活检的关键驱动因素。大多数肿瘤学家报告仅基于液体活检进行一线治疗时信心十足(60.7%-80.0%);而较少病理学家(37.9%)对这一决定感到放心。医生对检测和重新检测认知的差异凸显了利益相关者达成更大共识的必要性。