• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Defining the tipping point for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.确定翻修反肩关节置换术的临界点。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jul 23:17585732241263753. doi: 10.1177/17585732241263753.
2
Does the Relationship Between Preoperative Function and Achievement of Clinically Important Benchmarks of Success After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Depend on Outcome Assessment Design?全肩关节置换术后术前功能与临床重要成功指标之间的关系是否取决于结果评估设计?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Mar 1;483(3):377-395. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003347. Epub 2025 Jan 7.
3
Outcomes of revision versus re-revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: A case-control-matched cohort study.翻修与再次翻修的反式全肩关节置换术的结果:一项病例对照匹配队列研究。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Oct;16(5):543-550. doi: 10.1177/17585732231202214. Epub 2023 Sep 18.
4
Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state.量化首次翻修反式全肩关节置换术后的成功:最小临床重要差异、实质性临床获益和患者可接受的症状状态。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Oct;32(10):e516-e527. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.032. Epub 2023 May 11.
5
Conversion of Failed Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty to Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Yields Similar Pain and Functional Outcomes to Primary Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty But has a Higher Baseplate Failure Rate: A Matched Cohort Study.失败的解剖型全肩关节置换术转换为反置式肩关节置换术的疼痛和功能结果与初次反置式肩关节置换术相似,但基板失败率更高:一项配对队列研究。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2025 Jun 20. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-01296.
6
Outcomes of augmented vs. standard baseplates in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.反式肩关节置换术中增强型与标准型基板的疗效比较。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Aug;34(8):1904-1913. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.11.025. Epub 2025 Jan 17.
7
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty with tuberosity healing after proximal humeral fractures and rotator cuff arthropathy: similar functional outcomes and complications in patients after 10 years follow-up.肱骨近端骨折和肩袖关节病后结节愈合的反肩关节置换术:10年随访后患者的功能结局和并发症相似
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2025.04.030.
8
Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal and substantial clinically important percentage of maximal possible improvement.首次翻修反向全肩关节置换术后的疗效量化:最大可能改善的最小和显著临床重要百分比。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2024 Mar;33(3):593-603. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.08.024. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
9
Outcomes and complications of primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with minimum of 2 years' follow-up: a systematic review and meta-analysis.至少 2 年随访的初次反式肩关节置换术的结果和并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2022 Nov;31(11):e534-e544. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.06.005. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Whether the Indications for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Should Continue to Be Expanded? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.反肩关节置换术的适应症是否应继续扩大?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop Surg. 2025 Feb;17(2):313-332. doi: 10.1111/os.14311. Epub 2024 Dec 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantifying success after first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: the minimal clinically important difference, substantial clinical benefit, and patient acceptable symptomatic state.量化首次翻修反式全肩关节置换术后的成功:最小临床重要差异、实质性临床获益和患者可接受的症状状态。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Oct;32(10):e516-e527. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.03.032. Epub 2023 May 11.
2
Comparison of clinical outcomes of revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for failed primary anatomic vs. reverse shoulder arthroplasty.初次解剖型全肩关节置换术失败后翻修反置式全肩关节置换术与初次反置式全肩关节置换术临床结果的比较。
JSES Int. 2022 Dec 16;7(2):257-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.11.003. eCollection 2023 Mar.
3
Does body mass index influence long-term outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty?体重指数是否会影响解剖型全肩关节置换术后的长期疗效?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 May;32(5):991-1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.032. Epub 2022 Dec 2.
4
High and low performers in internal rotation after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biplane fluoroscopic study.反式全肩关节置换术后内旋时高绩效者和低绩效者:双平面荧光透视研究。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Apr;32(4):e133-e144. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.009. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
5
Prevalence of Shoulder Arthroplasty in the United States and the Increasing Burden of Revision Shoulder Arthroplasty.美国肩关节置换术的患病率及翻修肩关节置换术日益增加的负担。
JB JS Open Access. 2021 Jul 14;6(3). doi: 10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00156. eCollection 2021 Jul-Sep.
6
Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Anatomical Glenoid Component Loosening Was Not Universally Successful: A Detailed Analysis of 127 Consecutive Shoulders.解剖型肩胛盂假体松动的反肩关节置换术并非普遍成功:127 例连续肩关节的详细分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 May 19;103(10):879-886. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00555.
7
Validation of a machine learning-derived clinical metric to quantify outcomes after total shoulder arthroplasty.验证一种机器学习衍生的临床指标,以量化全肩关节置换术后的结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Oct;30(10):2211-2224. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.01.021. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
A 10-year experience with reverse shoulder arthroplasty: are we operating earlier?10 年反向肩关节置换术经验:我们是否更早进行手术?
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S126-S133. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.040.
9
The effect of body mass index on internal rotation and function following anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty.体重指数对解剖型和反式全肩关节置换术后内旋和功能的影响。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Feb;30(2):265-272. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.06.008. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
10
Defining the tipping point for primary shoulder arthroplasty.确定初次肩关节置换术的临界点。
JSES Open Access. 2019 Nov 18;3(4):273-277. doi: 10.1016/j.jses.2019.09.009. eCollection 2019 Dec.

确定翻修反肩关节置换术的临界点。

Defining the tipping point for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

作者信息

Buchanan Timothy R, Hao Kevin A, Cueto Robert J, Bindi Victoria E, O'Keefe Daniel S, Hones Keegan M, Krisanda Emily K, Wright Jonathan O, Wright Thomas W, Farmer Kevin W, Struk Aimee M, Schoch Bradley S, King Joseph J

机构信息

College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jul 23:17585732241263753. doi: 10.1177/17585732241263753.

DOI:10.1177/17585732241263753
PMID:39552664
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11565508/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study sought to characterize the tipping point values (the functional scores that patients deem dysfunctional enough to warrant surgery) for patients undergoing first revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA).

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of a prospectively collected single-institution database of patients undergoing first revision rTSA between August 2015 and December 2019. Tipping point evaluation utilized preoperative scores including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), raw and normalized Constant, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA) scores, and active range of motion including abduction, forward elevation (FE), external rotation (ER), and internal rotation score (IR) prior to elective revision rTSA.

RESULTS

We included 125 revision rTSAs. Tipping points were 37.6 ASES score, 30.5 raw Constant score, 35.5 normalized Constant score, 68.1 SPADI, 3.7 SST, 13.2 UCLA score, 64° abduction, 69° FE, 23° ER, and 3.1 IR. Higher SST was found for older patients and patients with a lower body mass index. Lower abduction and FE tipping points were reported in patients undergoing revision rTSA for rotator cuff failure, unexplained pain, and implant wear.

DISCUSSION

These tipping points can help surgeons counsel patients regarding when to undergo revision rTSA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; retrospective cohort study; treatment study.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在确定初次翻修反向全肩关节置换术(rTSA)患者的临界点值(患者认为功能障碍严重到足以进行手术的功能评分)。

方法

本研究是一项对前瞻性收集的单机构数据库的回顾性分析,该数据库包含2015年8月至2019年12月期间接受初次翻修rTSA的患者。临界点评估采用术前评分,包括美国肩肘外科医师学会(ASES)评分、原始和标准化的Constant评分、肩痛和功能障碍指数(SPADI)、简单肩关节测试(SST)以及加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)评分,以及择期翻修rTSA前的主动活动范围,包括外展、前屈(FE)、外旋(ER)和内旋评分(IR)。

结果

我们纳入了125例翻修rTSA病例。临界点分别为ASES评分37.6、原始Constant评分30.5、标准化Constant评分35.5、SPADI评分68.1、SST评分3.7、UCLA评分13.2、外展64°、前屈69°、外旋23°和内旋评分3.1。老年患者和体重指数较低的患者SST较高。因肩袖损伤、不明原因疼痛和植入物磨损接受翻修rTSA的患者外展和前屈临界点较低。

讨论

这些临界点可帮助外科医生就何时进行翻修rTSA向患者提供咨询。

证据水平

III级;回顾性队列研究;治疗研究。