• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

解剖型肩胛盂假体松动的反肩关节置换术并非普遍成功:127 例连续肩关节的详细分析。

Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Anatomical Glenoid Component Loosening Was Not Universally Successful: A Detailed Analysis of 127 Consecutive Shoulders.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 May 19;103(10):879-886. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00555.

DOI:10.2106/JBJS.20.00555
PMID:33764935
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Glenoid component loosening is a primary cause of failure of anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and is commonly associated with glenoid bone loss. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the outcome and survival following revision to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) for the treatment of loosening of a polyethylene cemented glenoid component in the setting of failed TSA.

METHODS

Between 2010 and 2017, 151 shoulders underwent revision to RSA for the treatment of loosening of an anatomical polyethylene glenoid component. Shoulders with staged reconstruction for the treatment of infection were excluded. One hundred and twenty-seven patients (67 women and 60 men) had a single-stage reconstruction and were available for follow-up. The mean age at the time of surgery was 70 years (range, 41 to 93 years). In all cases, the humeral component was revised and a standard glenoid baseplate was utilized. Bone graft was used at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed to collect demographic, intraoperative, and postoperative data; to quantify glenoid bone loss; and to determine the radiographic outcome. The mean duration of follow-up was 35 months (range, 24 to 84 months).

RESULTS

Revision to RSA resulted in significant improvements in terms of pain and motion. Sixteen shoulders (13%) underwent revision surgery for the treatment of baseplate loosening. Radiographic baseplate loosening was present in 6 additional shoulders (overall rate of baseplate loosening, 17%). Intraoperative fracture or fragmentation of the greater tuberosity occurred in 30 shoulders (24%). Other reoperations included resection for deep infection (3 shoulders), arthroscopic biopsies for unexplained persistent pain (2 shoulders), humeral tray exchange for dislocation (2 shoulders), revision for humeral loosening (1 shoulder), irrigation and debridement for hematoma (1 shoulder), and internal fixation of periprosthetic fracture (1 shoulder) (overall reoperation rate, 20%). Among shoulders with surviving implants at the time of the most recent follow-up, pain was rated as none or mild in 83 shoulders (65.4%) and the average active elevation and external rotation were 132° and 38°, respectively. With the numbers available, no risk factors for failure could be identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision RSA for the treatment of loosening of an anatomical polyethylene component was associated with a 17% glenoid mechanical failure rate. Although this procedure resulted in improvements in terms of pain and function, it was not universally successful and thus needs further refinement in order to improve outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

摘要

背景

肩盂组件松动是解剖型全肩关节置换术(TSA)失败的主要原因,通常与肩盂骨丢失有关。本研究的目的是评估在 TSA 失败后,采用反向全肩关节置换术(RSA)治疗聚乙烯骨水泥固定的肩盂组件松动的治疗效果和生存率。

方法

2010 年至 2017 年,151 例肩采用 RSA 翻修术治疗解剖型聚乙烯肩盂组件松动。排除因感染分期重建的病例。127 例患者(67 例女性和 60 例男性)行单阶段重建并获得随访。手术时的平均年龄为 70 岁(41 岁至 93 岁)。所有病例均更换肱骨头组件,并使用标准的肩盂基板。植骨由治疗医生决定。回顾病历和 X 线片以收集人口统计学、术中及术后数据;定量评估肩盂骨丢失;并确定影像学结果。平均随访时间为 35 个月(24 个月至 84 个月)。

结果

RSA 翻修可显著改善疼痛和运动功能。16 例(13%)因基板松动而行翻修手术。另外 6 例(总体基板松动率为 17%)出现放射学基板松动。30 例(24%)术中出现大结节骨折或碎裂。其他再次手术包括深部感染切除(3 例)、不明原因持续性疼痛行关节镜活检(2 例)、脱位行肱骨托置换(2 例)、肱骨头松动行翻修(1 例)、血肿冲洗引流(1 例)和假体周围骨折内固定(1 例)(再次手术率为 20%)。末次随访时,植入物存活的肩中,83 例(65.4%)疼痛评为无或轻度,平均主动抬高和外展分别为 132°和 38°。根据现有的数字,无法确定失败的危险因素。

结论

采用 RSA 翻修治疗解剖型聚乙烯组件松动的肩盂机械失败率为 17%。虽然该手术可改善疼痛和功能,但并非普遍成功,因此需要进一步改进以提高疗效。

证据水平

治疗性 IV 级。请参阅作者说明,以获取完整的证据水平描述。

相似文献

1
Revision Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty for Anatomical Glenoid Component Loosening Was Not Universally Successful: A Detailed Analysis of 127 Consecutive Shoulders.解剖型肩胛盂假体松动的反肩关节置换术并非普遍成功:127 例连续肩关节的详细分析。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2021 May 19;103(10):879-886. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00555.
2
Bony increased-offset-reverse shoulder arthroplasty: 5 to 10 years' follow-up.骨增强型反向肩关节置换术:5 至 10 年随访结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Oct;29(10):2111-2122. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.008. Epub 2020 Jun 4.
3
Mid-term radiological results of a cementless short humeral component in anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型和反式肩关节置换中无水泥短肱骨假体的中期放射学结果。
Bone Joint J. 2019 May;101-B(5):610-614. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B5.BJJ-2018-1374.R1.
4
Allograft-Prosthetic Composite Reconstruction for Massive Proximal Humeral Bone Loss in Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.异体假体复合物重建用于反肩关节置换术中肱骨近端大块骨缺损
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2017 Dec 20;99(24):2069-2076. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.16.01495.
5
Glenoid loosening and migration in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.肩袖反向关节成形术中的肩胛盂松动和迁移。
Bone Joint J. 2019 Apr;101-B(4):461-469. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B4.BJJ-2018-1275.R1.
6
Revision for a failed reverse: a 12-year review of a lateralized implant.失败翻修术:对侧植入物的12年回顾
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 May;25(5):e115-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2015.09.027. Epub 2015 Dec 15.
7
The association between glenoid component design and revision risk in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty.解剖型全肩关节置换术中肩胛盂假体设计与翻修风险的相关性。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Oct;29(10):2089-2096. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.02.024. Epub 2020 Jun 5.
8
Early results of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty using a patient-matched glenoid implant for severe glenoid bone deficiency.反向全肩关节置换术使用患者匹配型肩胛盂假体治疗严重肩胛盂骨缺损的早期结果。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2020 Jul;29(7S):S139-S148. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.04.024.
9
Primary Monoblock Inset Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Resulted in Decreased Pain and Improved Function.原发性整体式镶嵌式反向肩关节置换术可减轻疼痛,改善功能。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2019 Sep;477(9):2097-2108. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000761.
10
Can a reverse shoulder arthroplasty be used to revise a failed primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty?: Revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty for failed reverse prosthesis.反式肩关节置换术可否用于翻修初次失败的反式肩关节置换术?:翻修失败的反式假体的反式肩关节置换术。
Bone Joint J. 2018 Nov;100-B(11):1493-1498. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.100B11.BJJ-2018-0226.R2.

引用本文的文献

1
Baseplate coverage in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.反向全肩关节置换术中的基板覆盖范围:一项系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2025 Mar 29;5(3):460-468. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.02.010. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Current concepts in patient specific implants for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.用于反肩关节置换术的定制植入物的当前概念。
JSES Int. 2025 Jan 8;9(3):771-778. doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.12.007. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Trends in Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Narrative Review of Predominant Indications and the Most Commonly Employed Implant Designs.
肩关节置换术的发展趋势:主要适应证及最常用植入物设计的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 May 5;14(9):3186. doi: 10.3390/jcm14093186.
4
Cement-within-cement technique in revision reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: complications, reoperations, and revision rates at 5-year mean follow-up.翻修反式全肩关节置换术中的骨水泥套骨水泥技术:平均5年随访的并发症、再次手术及翻修率
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2024 Aug 30;5(1):1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2024.08.006. eCollection 2025 Feb.
5
Convertible metal-backed glenoid in total shoulder arthroplasty.全肩关节置换术中的可转换金属背衬关节盂
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Jan 14;6(1):82-92. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.61.BJO-2024-0118.R1.
6
Defining the tipping point for revision reverse shoulder arthroplasty.确定翻修反肩关节置换术的临界点。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jul 23:17585732241263753. doi: 10.1177/17585732241263753.
7
Anatomical total shoulder arthroplasty revision to reverse shoulder arthroplasty using convertible glenoid: a systematic review of clinical and radiological outcomes.解剖型全肩关节置换翻修为反式肩关节置换术,使用可转换肩胛盂:临床和影像学结果的系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2024 Sep;48(9):2411-2419. doi: 10.1007/s00264-024-06188-3. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
8
Converting to reverse shoulder arthroplasty from primary anatomic shoulder arthroplasty and fracture hemiarthroplasty: a radiographic and clinical outcome analysis at 8-years.从原发性解剖肩关节炎和骨折半关节成形术转换为反式肩关节成形术:8 年的放射学和临床结果分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 May;34(4):2193-2200. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03916-8. Epub 2024 Apr 5.
9
Periprosthetic fractures after shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.肩关节置换术后假体周围骨折:一项系统评价
EFORT Open Rev. 2023 Oct 3;8(10):748-758. doi: 10.1530/EOR-22-0097.
10
Shoulder arthroplasty in the setting of previous stabilization surgery: a systematic review of matched case control studies at minimum 2 years follow-up.既往稳定手术背景下的肩关节置换术:对至少随访2年的配对病例对照研究的系统评价
JSES Rev Rep Tech. 2023 Feb 4;3(2):166-180. doi: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2023.01.003. eCollection 2023 May.