• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Physical harms associated with suprascapular nerve block interventions in the non-surgical management of acute and chronic shoulder pain: A systematic review.在急性和慢性肩部疼痛的非手术治疗中,与肩胛上神经阻滞干预相关的身体伤害:一项系统评价。
Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jun 3:17585732241255679. doi: 10.1177/17585732241255679.
2
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Suprascapular Nerve Block With Physical Therapy, Placebo, and Intra-Articular Injection in Management of Chronic Shoulder Pain: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.肩胛上神经阻滞与物理治疗、安慰剂及关节内注射治疗慢性肩痛有效性的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Aug;97(8):1366-80. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
3
Comparative Effectiveness of Suprascapular Nerve Block in the Relief of Acute Post-Operative Shoulder Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.肩胛上神经阻滞缓解急性术后肩部疼痛的比较效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):445-56.
4
A systematic review of the methods and drugs used for performing suprascapular nerve block injections for the non-surgical management of chronic shoulder pain.一项关于用于慢性肩痛非手术治疗的肩胛上神经阻滞注射方法和药物的系统评价。
Br J Pain. 2021 Nov;15(4):460-473. doi: 10.1177/2049463721992091. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
5
Efficacy and safety of suprascapular nerve block combined with axillary nerve block for arthroscopic shoulder surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.肩锁关节镜手术中肩胛上神经阻滞联合腋神经阻滞的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2021 Oct;94:106111. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.106111. Epub 2021 Sep 11.
6
Does a Suprascapular Nerve block reduce chronic shoulder pain at 3 months compared to standard non-operative care? A systematic review.与标准非手术治疗相比,肩胛上神经阻滞在3个月时能否减轻慢性肩部疼痛?一项系统评价。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Apr 21;35(1):162. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04287-4.
7
Assessing the effectiveness of suprascapular nerve block in the treatment of frozen shoulder.评估肩胛上神经阻滞治疗肩周炎的有效性。
Bone Joint J. 2025 Jan 1;107-B(1):19-26. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.107B1.BJJ-2024-0644.R1.
8
Comparison of Spinoglenoid Versus Suprascapular Notch Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Distal Suprascapular Nerve Blocks for Shoulder Pain: A Prospective Randomized Trial.超声引导下肩胛上神经远端阻滞治疗肩痛:棘突旁与肩胛上切迹入路的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验。
Pain Physician. 2024 Jan;27(1):11-19.
9
Suprascapular Nerve Blockade for Postoperative Pain Control After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.关节镜下肩部手术后肩胛上神经阻滞用于术后疼痛控制:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Orthop J Sports Med. 2018 Dec 28;6(12):2325967118815859. doi: 10.1177/2325967118815859. eCollection 2018 Dec.
10
The Impact of Suprascapular Nerve Interventions in Patients with Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肩胛上神经介入治疗冻结肩患者的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JBJS Rev. 2021 Dec 22;9(12):01874474-202112000-00005. doi: e21.00042.

引用本文的文献

1
A UK-based consensus exercise to determine the most acceptable method of suprascapular nerve block injection for people consulting with rotator cuff disorders.一项基于英国的共识性活动,旨在确定针对肩袖疾病患者咨询时肩胛上神经阻滞注射的最可接受方法。
Shoulder Elbow. 2025 Jun 24:17585732251350116. doi: 10.1177/17585732251350116.
2
Rethink of the New Treatment for Refractory Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy [Letter].关于难治性疼痛性糖尿病周围神经病变新治疗方法的重新思考[信函]
J Pain Res. 2025 Feb 25;18:897-898. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S518245. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Ultrasound-guided low-volume anterior suprascapular nerve block for reduction of anterior shoulder dislocation in the emergency department: A case series.超声引导下小剂量肩胛上神经前支阻滞用于急诊科肩关节前脱位复位:病例系列
Turk J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 2;23(4):254-257. doi: 10.4103/tjem.tjem_319_22. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
2
Suprascapular Nerve Block (SSNB) improves the outcome in exercise based management of Primary Adhesive Capsulitis (PAC): A prospective randomized comparative study.肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)改善原发性粘连性关节囊炎(PAC)运动疗法的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2023 Apr-Jun;39(2):195-200. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_263_21. Epub 2022 Jan 11.
3
Iatrogenic Pneumothorax during Acupuncture: Case Report.针刺时医源性气胸:病例报告。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2023 Jun 7;59(6):1100. doi: 10.3390/medicina59061100.
4
Conducting separate reviews of benefits and harms could improve systematic reviews and meta-analyses.分别对获益和危害进行评价,可能会提高系统评价和荟萃分析的质量。
Syst Rev. 2023 Apr 15;12(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02234-0.
5
A randomized clinical trial of glenohumeral joint steroid injection versus suprascapular nerve block in patients with frozen shoulder: a protocol for the Therapeutic Injections For Frozen Shoulder (TIFFS) study.肩周炎患者肩关节类固醇注射与肩胛上神经阻滞的随机临床试验:肩周炎治疗性注射(TIFFS)研究方案
Bone Jt Open. 2023 Mar 16;4(3):205-209. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.43.BJO-2022-0066.R1.
6
Successful Glenohumeral Shoulder Reduction With Combined Suprascapular and Axillary Nerve Block.经肩胛上神经和腋神经联合阻滞实现成功的盂肱关节复位。
J Emerg Med. 2023 Mar;64(3):405-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
7
A systematic review of the global prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain.一项全球肩痛患病率和发病率的系统评价。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 8;23(1):1073. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05973-8.
8
Radiofrequency techniques for chronic pain.慢性疼痛的射频技术
BJA Educ. 2022 Dec;22(12):474-483. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
9
Case series: acupuncture-related pneumothorax.病例系列:与针灸相关的气胸
Int J Emerg Med. 2022 Sep 12;15(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s12245-022-00455-z.
10
The Use of a Suprascapular Nerve Block to Facilitate the Reduction of an Anterior Shoulder Dislocation: An Alternative for Elderly and Patients With Cardiopulmonary Comorbidities?肩胛上神经阻滞在肩关节前脱位复位中的应用:一种用于老年和合并心肺疾病患者的替代方法?
J Emerg Med. 2022 Aug;63(2):265-271. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2022.04.010. Epub 2022 Aug 28.

在急性和慢性肩部疼痛的非手术治疗中,与肩胛上神经阻滞干预相关的身体伤害:一项系统评价。

Physical harms associated with suprascapular nerve block interventions in the non-surgical management of acute and chronic shoulder pain: A systematic review.

作者信息

Annison David Richard, Smith Neil, Salt Emma, Noblet Tim, Rangan Amar, McDaid Catriona

机构信息

South Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Academic Centre for Surgery, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK.

Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Shoulder Elbow. 2024 Jun 3:17585732241255679. doi: 10.1177/17585732241255679.

DOI:10.1177/17585732241255679
PMID:39552675
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11565519/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The utility of the suprascapular nerve block (SSNB) in the non-surgical management of shoulder pain continues to be explored, whilst its associated physical harms have not. This systematic review aims to report the physical harms associated with the SSNB in the non-surgical management of shoulder pain.

METHODS

A search was undertaken of AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Medline, Pubmed, and Scopus databases. Studies were included if they reported the presence or absence of harm following a SSNB intervention (injection, pulsed radiofrequency, ablation) in the non-surgical management of acute or chronic shoulder pain. Excluded studies were those which utilised SSNB for peri, intra, or post-surgical intervention. The McMaster tool for assessing quality of harms assessment and reporting was utilised.

RESULTS

A total of 111 studies were included in this review of which 168 episodes of harm were reported across 4142 participants. Harm severity ranged from pneumothorax (n = 5) to local pain and bruising (n = 50). The quality of harms assessment and reporting across all studies was poor.

DISCUSSION

Despite heterogeneity in SSNB intervention, and low-quality evidence, SSNB carries a low risk of physical harm. Further work is needed in addressing the poor quality of harms assessment and reporting in SSNB studies.

摘要

背景

肩胛上神经阻滞(SSNB)在肩部疼痛非手术治疗中的效用仍在探索之中,而其相关的身体伤害却未得到研究。本系统评价旨在报告在肩部疼痛非手术治疗中与SSNB相关的身体伤害。

方法

检索了AMED、CINAHL、Cochrane图书馆、EMBASE、Medline、Pubmed和Scopus数据库。纳入的研究需报告在急性或慢性肩部疼痛非手术治疗中进行SSNB干预(注射、脉冲射频、消融)后是否存在伤害。排除的研究是那些将SSNB用于围手术期、手术中或手术后干预的研究。采用了麦克马斯特伤害评估和报告质量工具。

结果

本评价共纳入111项研究,4142名参与者中有168例报告了伤害事件。伤害严重程度从气胸(n = 5)到局部疼痛和瘀伤(n = 50)不等。所有研究中伤害评估和报告的质量都很差。

讨论

尽管SSNB干预存在异质性且证据质量较低,但SSNB造成身体伤害的风险较低。需要进一步开展工作来解决SSNB研究中伤害评估和报告质量差的问题。