Katsuki Masahito, Ooka Miho, Wada Yasuhiro, Nakata Yuki, Sato Daiki
Physical Education and Health Center, Nagaoka University of Technology, Nagaoka, JPN.
Department of Neurosurgery, Tsubame-Sanjo Sugoro Neurospine Clinic, Sanjo, JPN.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 17;16(10):e71737. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71737. eCollection 2024 Oct.
An occupational doctor cannot perform medical procedures, such as diagnosis and prescription. They can only give advice to the workplace. Online telemedicine facilitates workplace-doctor collaboration and may solve this problem. We present the first case of migraine treated by hybrid consultation via in-person and online telemedicine at the occupational health office. In the present case, a 36-year-old male had experienced headaches since age 15 and had been diagnosed with migraine. He was on prophylactic treatment with 10 mg of lomerizine, experiencing one monthly migraine attack, often relieved by 50 mg of sumatriptan. His Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score was 56 at the consultation. He visited the occupational health nurse's office due to a migraine attack. An occupational doctor assessed him and diagnosed a migraine attack. The patient requested triptans, but only over-the-counter acetaminophen was available, and the doctor could not prescribe medication because the doctor was just an occupational doctor, and the nurse's office was not a clinic under the Japanese Medical Act. The occupational doctor, who was also hired by the other clinic as a physician, conducted an online consultation via the clinic at the nurse's office, diagnosed a migraine attack, and prescribed 50 mg of sumatriptan. The prescription was sent to a nearby pharmacy, and the patient found relief within 15 minutes after taking the triptan. Regular online consultation at the nurse's office has been continued, and prophylactic medications were strengthened. His migraine frequency decreased once in five months, and the HIT-6 score improved to 50. Performing online telemedicine at the workplace, such as the occupational nurse's office, could overturn the conventional wisdom that occupational physicians cannot perform medical treatment at non-medical institutions and can only refer patients to other clinics based on the Japanese Medical Act. Our case suggested the importance of strategic collaboration between occupational doctors and telemedicine-enabled medical facilities in ensuring seamless healthcare delivery, particularly for busy workers.
职业医生不能进行诊断和开处方等医疗程序。他们只能为工作场所提供建议。在线远程医疗促进了工作场所与医生的合作,可能会解决这个问题。我们介绍了第一例在职业健康办公室通过面对面和在线远程医疗混合咨询治疗偏头痛的病例。在本病例中,一名36岁男性自15岁起就患有头痛,被诊断为偏头痛。他正在服用10毫克洛美利嗪进行预防性治疗,每月发作一次偏头痛,通常服用50毫克舒马曲坦后可缓解。会诊时他的头痛影响测试-6(HIT-6)评分为56分。他因偏头痛发作前往职业健康护士办公室。一名职业医生对他进行了评估,并诊断为偏头痛发作。患者要求使用曲坦类药物,但只有非处方的对乙酰氨基酚,而且由于该医生只是一名职业医生,护士办公室不属于日本《医疗法》规定的诊所,所以医生无法开药。这位同时受雇于另一家诊所的职业医生通过护士办公室的诊所进行了在线咨询,诊断为偏头痛发作,并开了50毫克舒马曲坦。处方被发送到附近的药店,患者服用曲坦类药物后15分钟内症状缓解。此后继续在护士办公室进行定期在线咨询,并加强了预防性药物治疗。他的偏头痛发作频率降至每五个月一次,HIT-6评分提高到了50分。在工作场所,如职业护士办公室开展在线远程医疗,可能会颠覆职业医生不能在非医疗机构进行治疗、只能根据日本《医疗法》将患者转诊至其他诊所的传统观念。我们的病例表明,职业医生与具备远程医疗功能的医疗机构之间进行战略合作,对于确保无缝医疗服务提供,尤其是对忙碌的工作者而言,具有重要意义。