• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用真实世界数据比较两性霉素B制剂的不良事件概况

Comparison of Adverse Event Profiles of Amphotericin B Formulations Using Real-World Data.

作者信息

Nokura Yuka, Maezawa Mika, Miyasaka Koumi, Hirofuji Sakiko, Nakao Satoshi, Yamashita Moe, Ichihara Nanaka, Sugishita Kana, Yamazaki Tomofumi, Tamaki Hirofumi, Iguchi Kazuhiro, Tahara Kohei, Nakamura Mitsuhiro

机构信息

Laboratory of Drug Informatics, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, JPN.

Department of Pharmacy, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, JPN.

出版信息

Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71588. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71588. eCollection 2024 Oct.

DOI:10.7759/cureus.71588
PMID:39553150
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11565214/
Abstract

Amphotericin B deoxycholate (AMPH-B) is a polyene macrolide with antifungal activity. Liposomal AMPH-B (L-AMB) was developed to reduce side effects while maintaining antifungal activity. This study was aimed at evaluating and comparing the adverse event profiles of AMPH-B and L-AMB using a spontaneous reporting system. We analyzed the adverse event reports of AMPH-B and L-AMB from the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Case report counts of adverse events were generated according to the preferred terms of the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA). Standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs) and system organ classes (SOCs) were used to compare the organ-specific adverse event profiles of AMPH-B and L-AMB. The reporting odds ratio and proportional reporting rate were used to detect pharmacovigilance signals. The FAERS database contains 21,173,818 cases from January 2004 to March 2024. Adverse events were reported in 2438 cases receiving AMPH-B treatment and 3344 cases receiving L-AMB treatment, including 848 and 1591 cases receiving intravenous AMPH-B and L-AMB injections, respectively. The most frequently reported drug-related adverse event in the AMPH-B and L-AMB groups was hypokalemia. SOCs with statistically significant differences were "Inv" (laboratory tests), "Resp" (respiratory, thoracic, and mediastinal disorders), "Genrl" (general and systemic disorders and conditions at the site of administration), "Card" (cardiac disorders), and "Blood" (blood and lymphatic system disorders). No statistically significant difference was observed in the SMQ profile of adverse events in "Renal" (renal and urinary disorders) and "Hepat" (hepatobiliary disorders) between the L-AMB and AMPH-B formulations in this study. Based on real-world data from FAERS, adverse event profiles of AMPH-B and L-AMB were compared. No statistically significant difference was observed in the SMQ profile of adverse events in the renal and hepatic SOCs between the L-AMB and AMPH-B formulations. Our results suggest that L-AMB is more tolerated by the kidneys than AMPH-B.

摘要

两性霉素B脱氧胆酸盐(AMPH - B)是一种具有抗真菌活性的多烯大环内酯类药物。脂质体两性霉素B(L - AMB)的研发目的是在保持抗真菌活性的同时减少副作用。本研究旨在使用自发报告系统评估和比较AMPH - B和L - AMB的不良事件谱。我们分析了来自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)中AMPH - B和L - AMB的不良事件报告。根据《监管活动医学词典》(MedDRA)的首选术语生成不良事件的病例报告计数。使用标准化MedDRA查询(SMQ)和系统器官分类(SOC)来比较AMPH - B和L - AMB的器官特异性不良事件谱。报告比值比和比例报告率用于检测药物警戒信号。FAERS数据库包含2004年1月至2024年3月的21,173,818例病例。接受AMPH - B治疗的2438例和接受L - AMB治疗的3344例报告了不良事件,其中分别有848例和1591例接受了静脉注射AMPH - B和L - AMB。AMPH - B组和L - AMB组中最常报告的与药物相关的不良事件是低钾血症。具有统计学显著差异的SOC是“Inv”(实验室检查)、“Resp”(呼吸、胸和纵隔疾病)、“Genrl”(全身和全身性疾病以及给药部位情况)、“Card”(心脏疾病)和“Blood”(血液和淋巴系统疾病)。在本研究中,L - AMB和AMPH - B制剂在“Renal”(肾脏和泌尿系统疾病)和“Hepat”(肝胆系统疾病)的不良事件SMQ谱中未观察到统计学显著差异。基于FAERS的真实世界数据,比较了AMPH - B和L - AMB的不良事件谱。在L - AMB和AMPH - B制剂的肾脏和肝脏SOC不良事件SMQ谱中未观察到统计学显著差异。我们的结果表明,与AMPH - B相比,L - AMB对肾脏的耐受性更好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed0/11565214/0a5b9eb185a1/cureus-0016-00000071588-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed0/11565214/0a5b9eb185a1/cureus-0016-00000071588-i01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ed0/11565214/0a5b9eb185a1/cureus-0016-00000071588-i01.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Adverse Event Profiles of Amphotericin B Formulations Using Real-World Data.利用真实世界数据比较两性霉素B制剂的不良事件概况
Cureus. 2024 Oct 16;16(10):e71588. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71588. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
AmBisome: relationship between the pharmacokinetic characteristics acquired by liposomal formulation and safety/efficacy.两性霉素 B 脂质体:脂质体制剂获得的药代动力学特征与安全性/疗效的关系。
J Liposome Res. 2017 Sep;27(3):186-194. doi: 10.1080/08982104.2016.1205087. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
3
Immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with angiogenesis inhibitors: A real-world pharmacovigilance analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database (2014-2022).免疫检查点抑制剂联合血管生成抑制剂的免疫相关不良事件:FDA 不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库(2014-2022 年)的真实世界药物警戒分析。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2024 Jul 30;136:112301. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112301. Epub 2024 Jun 4.
4
Safety profiles of methylphenidate, amphetamine, and atomoxetine: analysis of spontaneous reports submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.哌甲酯、苯丙胺和托莫西汀的安全性概况:对提交至美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的自发报告的分析
Front Pharmacol. 2023 Aug 14;14:1208456. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1208456. eCollection 2023.
5
Comparison of the adverse event profiles of conventional and liposomal formulations of doxorubicin using the FDA adverse event reporting system.使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统对阿霉素常规制剂和脂质体制剂的不良事件情况进行比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 27;12(9):e0185654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185654. eCollection 2017.
6
Data mining and analysis of adverse event signals associated with teprotumumab using the Food and Drug Administration adverse event reporting system database.利用食品和药物管理局不良事件报告系统数据库挖掘和分析与 teprotumumab 相关的不良事件信号。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Apr;46(2):471-479. doi: 10.1007/s11096-023-01676-9. Epub 2024 Jan 20.
7
Plasma protein binding of amphotericin B and pharmacokinetics of bound versus unbound amphotericin B after administration of intravenous liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome) and amphotericin B deoxycholate.静脉注射两性霉素B脂质体(安必素)和去氧胆酸盐两性霉素B后两性霉素B的血浆蛋白结合及结合型与游离型两性霉素B的药代动力学
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2002 Mar;46(3):834-40. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.3.834-840.2002.
8
Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of liposomal amphotericin B and analysis of the relationship between pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety in patients with hematological diseases.脂质体两性霉素 B 的药代动力学评价及血液病患者药代动力学、疗效与安全性的关系分析。
J Infect Chemother. 2024 Jun;30(6):504-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.12.004. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
9
Adverse event profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitors: data mining and disproportionality analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system.细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂的不良事件概况:美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的数据挖掘与不成比例性分析
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Sep 24;15:20420986241278498. doi: 10.1177/20420986241278498. eCollection 2024.
10
A disproportionality analysis for assessing the safety of FLT3 inhibitors using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统(FAERS)对FLT3抑制剂安全性进行的不均衡性分析。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Oct 4;15:20420986241284105. doi: 10.1177/20420986241284105. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
A real-world study based on the FAERS database evaluating adverse drug reactions in three amphotericin B lipid formulations.一项基于FAERS数据库的真实世界研究,评估三种两性霉素B脂质制剂的药物不良反应。
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025 Jun 12;18(1):2514155. doi: 10.1080/20523211.2025.2514155. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Trends in the Prevalence of Amphotericin B-Resistance (AmBR) among Clinical Isolates of Aspergillus Species.曲霉属临床分离株中两性霉素B耐药性(AmBR)的流行趋势
J Mycol Med. 2022 Nov;32(4):101310. doi: 10.1016/j.mycmed.2022.101310. Epub 2022 Jul 14.
2
Sixty years of Amphotericin B: An Overview of the Main Antifungal Agent Used to Treat Invasive Fungal Infections.两性霉素B的六十年:用于治疗侵袭性真菌感染的主要抗真菌药物综述
Infect Dis Ther. 2021 Mar;10(1):115-147. doi: 10.1007/s40121-020-00382-7. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
3
Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Safety and Efficacy of Liposomal Amphotericin B.
脂质体两性霉素 B 的临床药代动力学、药效学、安全性和疗效。
Clin Infect Dis. 2019 May 2;68(Suppl 4):S260-S274. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciz076.
4
Evaluation of pregabalin-induced adverse events related to falls using the FDA adverse event reporting system and Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report databases.使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统和日本药品不良事件报告数据库评估普瑞巴林引起的与跌倒相关的不良事件。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2019 Apr;44(2):285-291. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12790. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
5
Comparison of the adverse event profiles of conventional and liposomal formulations of doxorubicin using the FDA adverse event reporting system.使用美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统对阿霉素常规制剂和脂质体制剂的不良事件情况进行比较。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 27;12(9):e0185654. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185654. eCollection 2017.
6
Practice Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Aspergillosis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.曲霉病诊断和管理实践指南:美国感染病学会2016年更新版
Clin Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 15;63(4):e1-e60. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw326. Epub 2016 Jun 29.
7
Meta-analysis of clinical and preclinical studies comparing the anticancer efficacy of liposomal versus conventional non-liposomal doxorubicin.比较脂质体与常规非脂质体阿霉素抗癌疗效的临床前和临床研究的荟萃分析。
J Control Release. 2016 Jun 28;232:255-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.04.028. Epub 2016 Apr 22.
8
Liposomal Amphotericin B (AmBisome(®)): A Review of the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, Clinical Experience and Future Directions.脂质体两性霉素B(安必素(®)):药代动力学、药效学、临床经验及未来方向综述
Drugs. 2016 Mar;76(4):485-500. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0538-7.
9
Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity.两性霉素 B 制剂:疗效和毒性的比较评价。
Drugs. 2013 Jun;73(9):919-34. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4.
10
Does lipid emulsion reduce amphotericin B nephrotoxicity? A systematic review and meta-analysis.脂质体能否降低两性霉素 B 的肾毒性?系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2012 Jun;54(12):1774-7. doi: 10.1093/cid/cis290. Epub 2012 Apr 5.