• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Qualitative Research on the Topic of End-of-Life Care and a Palliative Care Approach in Persons with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: Reflections and Take-Home Messages.重度和持续性精神疾病患者临终关怀及姑息治疗方法主题的定性研究:思考与要点
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 1;25(5):656-660. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241693. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
How to engage people experiencing severe and persistent mental illness in qualitative research: a descriptive and reflexive analysis.如何让患有严重和持久精神疾病的人参与定性研究:描述性和反思性分析。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024 Dec;19(1):2408817. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2024.2408817. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
3
Mapping the ethical aspects in end-of-life care for persons with a severe and persistent mental illness: A scoping review of the literature.重度持续性精神疾病患者临终关怀中的伦理问题映射:文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 16;14:1094038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094038. eCollection 2023.
4
A scoping review of palliative care for persons with severe persistent mental illness.严重持续性精神疾病患者姑息治疗的范围综述。
Palliat Support Care. 2019 Aug;17(4):479-487. doi: 10.1017/S1478951519000087.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
Acceptability of palliative care approaches for patients with severe and persistent mental illness: a survey of psychiatrists in Switzerland.接受度调查:严重且持续的精神疾病患者的姑息治疗方法——瑞士精神科医生调查
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2091-x.
7
Oyster Care: An Innovative Palliative Approach towards SPMI Patients.牡蛎关怀:一种针对严重精神疾病患者的创新姑息治疗方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 8;11:509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00509. eCollection 2020.
8
A qualitative systematic review of internal and external influences on shared decision-making in all health care settings.对所有医疗环境中共同决策的内部和外部影响进行的定性系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2012;10(58):4633-4646. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2012-432.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Opportunities and challenges in involving people with lived experience of inclusion health as co-researchers in palliative and end of life research: a rapid review and thematic synthesis.将有包容性健康生活经历的人纳入姑息治疗和临终研究共同研究者的机遇与挑战:快速回顾与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Apr 20;9(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00436-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing Dementia Awareness and Screening, and Reducing Stigmatizing Attitudes towards Dementia in Urban China: The Role of Opinion Leader Intervention in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.提高中国城市地区对痴呆症的认知与筛查,并减少对痴呆症的污名化态度:意见领袖干预在社区老年人中的作用
Alpha Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 7;26(2):38857. doi: 10.31083/AP38857. eCollection 2025 Apr.

本文引用的文献

1
Mapping the ethical aspects in end-of-life care for persons with a severe and persistent mental illness: A scoping review of the literature.重度持续性精神疾病患者临终关怀中的伦理问题映射:文献综述
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Mar 16;14:1094038. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1094038. eCollection 2023.
2
Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting.主题分析在健康心理学中应用得好吗?对已发表研究的批判性评价,以及对质量实践和报告的建议。
Health Psychol Rev. 2023 Dec;17(4):695-718. doi: 10.1080/17437199.2022.2161594. Epub 2023 Jan 19.
3
Palliative psychiatry in a narrow and in a broad sense: A concept clarification.狭义和广义的缓和精神病学:概念澄清。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;56(12):1535-1541. doi: 10.1177/00048674221114784. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
4
The impact of the euthanasia assessment procedure: a qualitative interview study among adults with psychiatric conditions.安乐死评估程序的影响:一项针对精神疾病成年人的定性访谈研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2022 Jun 27;22(1):435. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04039-2.
5
Why adults with psychiatric conditions request euthanasia: A qualitative interview study of life experiences, motives and preventive factors.为什么有精神疾病的成年人会要求安乐死:一项对生活经历、动机和预防因素的定性访谈研究。
J Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;144:158-167. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.09.032. Epub 2021 Sep 23.
6
Defining Severe and Persistent Mental Illness-A Pragmatic Utility Concept Analysis.定义严重及持续性精神疾病——一种实用效用概念分析
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jul 6;11:648. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00648. eCollection 2020.
7
Oyster Care: An Innovative Palliative Approach towards SPMI Patients.牡蛎关怀:一种针对严重精神疾病患者的创新姑息治疗方法。
Front Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 8;11:509. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00509. eCollection 2020.
8
Ethical and methodological issues in qualitative studies involving people with severe and persistent mental illness such as schizophrenia and other psychotic conditions: a critical review.涉及精神分裂症和其他精神病性障碍等严重持续性精神疾病患者的定性研究中的伦理和方法学问题:一项批判性综述。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2017;12(sup2):1368323. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2017.1368323.
9
Access to specialist palliative care services by people with severe and persistent mental illness: A retrospective cohort study.严重和持续性精神疾病患者获得专科姑息治疗服务的情况:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2018 Apr;27(2):737-746. doi: 10.1111/inm.12360. Epub 2017 Jul 10.
10
Challenges in accessing and interviewing participants with severe mental illness.在接触和访谈患有严重精神疾病的参与者时所面临的挑战。
Nurse Res. 2017 Jun 22;25(1):37-42. doi: 10.7748/nr.2017.e1443.

重度和持续性精神疾病患者临终关怀及姑息治疗方法主题的定性研究:思考与要点

Qualitative Research on the Topic of End-of-Life Care and a Palliative Care Approach in Persons with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: Reflections and Take-Home Messages.

作者信息

Moureau Loïc, Van Hoe Caressa, Verhofstadt Monica

机构信息

Department of Pastoral and Practical Theology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Practical and Empirical Theology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 1;25(5):656-660. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241693. eCollection 2024 Sep.

DOI:10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241693
PMID:39553500
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11562099/
Abstract

Persons experiencing severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) constitute a small but vulnerable population in healthcare and society. Nonetheless, it is advocated to involve people with SPMI in research to improve how care is provided to them. However, qualitative research with this population is challenging due to several factors, including (self-) stigma, assessment of decision-making capacity, reduced communication skills, and the (perceived) risk of adverse events, resulting in relative scarcity in academic interest and scientific publications. In this contribution, the authors share their practical experiences in conducting qualitative research among this group of people, specifically focusing on sensitive topics including end-of-life care and palliative care approaches. Both beneficial and challenging factors encountered across the different research stages are systematically delineated and reflected upon. Qualitative research involving persons with SPMI necessitates a different perspective on methodology and requires specific competencies from researchers. As might be expected, adequate preparation, thorough follow-up, and support for all involved are critical success factors. Additionally, however, it may also require adopting a somewhat unconventional approach to qualitative interviewing, encouraging creativity and ethical reflection as guiding principles. Exploring alternative methodologies and non-conventional engagement in research could provide a much-needed voice to individuals who are currently unrepresented in the research discourse.

摘要

患有严重且持续性精神疾病(SPMI)的人群在医疗保健和社会中虽占比小但较为脆弱。尽管如此,仍提倡让患有SPMI的人参与研究,以改善为他们提供护理的方式。然而,对这一人群进行定性研究具有挑战性,原因有多个方面,包括(自我)污名化、决策能力评估、沟通技能下降以及(感知到的)不良事件风险,这导致学术关注度和科学出版物相对稀缺。在本文中,作者分享了他们在这一人群中开展定性研究的实践经验,特别关注包括临终关怀和姑息治疗方法在内的敏感话题。系统地阐述并反思了在不同研究阶段遇到的有益因素和具有挑战性的因素。涉及患有SPMI的人的定性研究需要对方法论有不同的视角,并且要求研究人员具备特定的能力。不出所料,充分的准备、全面的后续跟进以及对所有相关人员的支持是关键的成功因素。此外,它可能还需要采用某种非传统的定性访谈方法,鼓励将创造力和伦理反思作为指导原则。探索替代方法和非传统的研究参与方式,可以为目前在研究话语中没有代表的个人提供急需的发声机会。