Suppr超能文献

重度和持续性精神疾病患者临终关怀及姑息治疗方法主题的定性研究:思考与要点

Qualitative Research on the Topic of End-of-Life Care and a Palliative Care Approach in Persons with Severe and Persistent Mental Illness: Reflections and Take-Home Messages.

作者信息

Moureau Loïc, Van Hoe Caressa, Verhofstadt Monica

机构信息

Department of Pastoral and Practical Theology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Practical and Empirical Theology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

出版信息

Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 1;25(5):656-660. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241693. eCollection 2024 Sep.

Abstract

Persons experiencing severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) constitute a small but vulnerable population in healthcare and society. Nonetheless, it is advocated to involve people with SPMI in research to improve how care is provided to them. However, qualitative research with this population is challenging due to several factors, including (self-) stigma, assessment of decision-making capacity, reduced communication skills, and the (perceived) risk of adverse events, resulting in relative scarcity in academic interest and scientific publications. In this contribution, the authors share their practical experiences in conducting qualitative research among this group of people, specifically focusing on sensitive topics including end-of-life care and palliative care approaches. Both beneficial and challenging factors encountered across the different research stages are systematically delineated and reflected upon. Qualitative research involving persons with SPMI necessitates a different perspective on methodology and requires specific competencies from researchers. As might be expected, adequate preparation, thorough follow-up, and support for all involved are critical success factors. Additionally, however, it may also require adopting a somewhat unconventional approach to qualitative interviewing, encouraging creativity and ethical reflection as guiding principles. Exploring alternative methodologies and non-conventional engagement in research could provide a much-needed voice to individuals who are currently unrepresented in the research discourse.

摘要

患有严重且持续性精神疾病(SPMI)的人群在医疗保健和社会中虽占比小但较为脆弱。尽管如此,仍提倡让患有SPMI的人参与研究,以改善为他们提供护理的方式。然而,对这一人群进行定性研究具有挑战性,原因有多个方面,包括(自我)污名化、决策能力评估、沟通技能下降以及(感知到的)不良事件风险,这导致学术关注度和科学出版物相对稀缺。在本文中,作者分享了他们在这一人群中开展定性研究的实践经验,特别关注包括临终关怀和姑息治疗方法在内的敏感话题。系统地阐述并反思了在不同研究阶段遇到的有益因素和具有挑战性的因素。涉及患有SPMI的人的定性研究需要对方法论有不同的视角,并且要求研究人员具备特定的能力。不出所料,充分的准备、全面的后续跟进以及对所有相关人员的支持是关键的成功因素。此外,它可能还需要采用某种非传统的定性访谈方法,鼓励将创造力和伦理反思作为指导原则。探索替代方法和非传统的研究参与方式,可以为目前在研究话语中没有代表的个人提供急需的发声机会。

相似文献

9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

本文引用的文献

3
Palliative psychiatry in a narrow and in a broad sense: A concept clarification.狭义和广义的缓和精神病学:概念澄清。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022 Dec;56(12):1535-1541. doi: 10.1177/00048674221114784. Epub 2022 Aug 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验