Moureau Loïc, Van Hoe Caressa, Verhofstadt Monica
Department of Pastoral and Practical Theology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Practical and Empirical Theology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 1;25(5):656-660. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241693. eCollection 2024 Sep.
Persons experiencing severe and persistent mental illness (SPMI) constitute a small but vulnerable population in healthcare and society. Nonetheless, it is advocated to involve people with SPMI in research to improve how care is provided to them. However, qualitative research with this population is challenging due to several factors, including (self-) stigma, assessment of decision-making capacity, reduced communication skills, and the (perceived) risk of adverse events, resulting in relative scarcity in academic interest and scientific publications. In this contribution, the authors share their practical experiences in conducting qualitative research among this group of people, specifically focusing on sensitive topics including end-of-life care and palliative care approaches. Both beneficial and challenging factors encountered across the different research stages are systematically delineated and reflected upon. Qualitative research involving persons with SPMI necessitates a different perspective on methodology and requires specific competencies from researchers. As might be expected, adequate preparation, thorough follow-up, and support for all involved are critical success factors. Additionally, however, it may also require adopting a somewhat unconventional approach to qualitative interviewing, encouraging creativity and ethical reflection as guiding principles. Exploring alternative methodologies and non-conventional engagement in research could provide a much-needed voice to individuals who are currently unrepresented in the research discourse.
患有严重且持续性精神疾病(SPMI)的人群在医疗保健和社会中虽占比小但较为脆弱。尽管如此,仍提倡让患有SPMI的人参与研究,以改善为他们提供护理的方式。然而,对这一人群进行定性研究具有挑战性,原因有多个方面,包括(自我)污名化、决策能力评估、沟通技能下降以及(感知到的)不良事件风险,这导致学术关注度和科学出版物相对稀缺。在本文中,作者分享了他们在这一人群中开展定性研究的实践经验,特别关注包括临终关怀和姑息治疗方法在内的敏感话题。系统地阐述并反思了在不同研究阶段遇到的有益因素和具有挑战性的因素。涉及患有SPMI的人的定性研究需要对方法论有不同的视角,并且要求研究人员具备特定的能力。不出所料,充分的准备、全面的后续跟进以及对所有相关人员的支持是关键的成功因素。此外,它可能还需要采用某种非传统的定性访谈方法,鼓励将创造力和伦理反思作为指导原则。探索替代方法和非传统的研究参与方式,可以为目前在研究话语中没有代表的个人提供急需的发声机会。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2024-12
Palliat Support Care. 2019-8
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1
Front Psychiatry. 2020-6-8
Early Hum Dev. 2020-11
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2022-12
Front Psychiatry. 2020-7-6
Front Psychiatry. 2020-6-8
Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2017-7-10