Ekert Justyna O, Goyal Anshit, Young Jacob S, Hervey-Jumper Shawn L, Berger Mitchel S
Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA.
Department of Neurosurgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA.
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Jul 16;11(6):679-690. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae066. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Harnessing the neuroplastic potential of the human brain is being increasingly recognized as an important neuro-oncological paradigm to facilitate safe resection of brain tumors while preserving neurological function and quality of life. Interventional neurorehabilitation, employing both invasive and noninvasive neuromodulation techniques, represents an important emerging therapeutic strategy to induce or enhance neural plasticity to promote functional recovery in brain tumor patients. This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of interventional neurorehabilitation techniques for glioma patients.
In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, searches of Medline, Embase, Web of Science, APA PsycINFO, and Cochrane were undertaken from database inception to November 28, 2023. Studies reporting on neuromodulation applied to glioma patients were included.
Seven studies reporting findings from 118 patients met the inclusion criteria. Three neuromodulation techniques were identified and included transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) reported in 5 out of 7 (71.4%) studies; transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); and continuous cortical electrical stimulation (cCES) using grid electrodes, reported in one study each. All studies applying noninvasive stimulation to ameliorate postoperative deficits demonstrated an improvement on at least one outcome measure. The 2 studies applying tDCS and cCES to induce plasticity reported evidence of functional reorganization.
There is emerging evidence of benefits of neuromodulation to improve postoperative outcome in glioma patients. In the current literature, noninvasive stimulation has shown to have a favorable safety profile. Large-scale, double-blind, sham-controlled trials are warranted to further investigate the effectiveness of these interventions for modulating different cognitive networks in patients undergoing glioma surgery.
利用人类大脑的神经可塑性潜力,正日益被视为一种重要的神经肿瘤学范式,以促进脑肿瘤的安全切除,同时保留神经功能和生活质量。介入性神经康复采用侵入性和非侵入性神经调节技术,是一种重要的新兴治疗策略,可诱导或增强神经可塑性,以促进脑肿瘤患者的功能恢复。本研究旨在对胶质瘤患者的介入性神经康复技术进行全面综述。
根据PRISMA指南,从数据库建立至2023年11月28日,对Medline、Embase、Web of Science、APA PsycINFO和Cochrane进行检索。纳入报告神经调节应用于胶质瘤患者的研究。
七项报告118例患者研究结果的研究符合纳入标准。确定了三种神经调节技术,包括7项研究中的5项(71.4%)报告的经颅磁刺激(TMS);经颅直流电刺激(tDCS);以及一项研究中报告的使用网格电极的连续皮质电刺激(cCES)。所有应用非侵入性刺激改善术后缺陷的研究均显示至少一项结局指标有所改善。两项应用tDCS和cCES诱导可塑性的研究报告了功能重组的证据。
有新证据表明神经调节对改善胶质瘤患者术后结局有益。在当前文献中,非侵入性刺激已显示出良好的安全性。有必要进行大规模、双盲、假对照试验,以进一步研究这些干预措施对调节胶质瘤手术患者不同认知网络的有效性。