• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在门诊快速通道心脏病诊所评估的疑似心脏病理的安全结果。

Safety outcomes of suspected cardiac pathology assessed in an ambulatory rapid-access cardiology clinic.

作者信息

Tang Pok-Tin, Bussmann Benjamin, Shabbir Asad, Elkington Andrew, Orr William

机构信息

Cardiology Senior House Officer.

Cardiology Registrar.

出版信息

Br J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 16;31(2):017. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2024.017. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.5837/bjc.2024.017
PMID:39555463
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11562569/
Abstract

Cardiac pathology contributes to a significant proportion of emergency department (ED) attendances. Many could be managed as urgent outpatients and avoid hospital admission. We evaluated a novel rapidaccess general cardiology clinic to achieve this, implemented during the COVID-19 pandemic. We performed a retrospective review of baseline characteristics, investigations, final diagnoses, and 90-day safety (readmission, major adverse cardiovascular events [MACE], mortality) from electronic records and conducted a patient experience survey. There were 216 ED referrals made between 1 June and 30 October 2020. The median time to review was two days (interquartile range 1-5). At 90 days, there were three (1.4%) representations requiring admission, two (0.9%) MACE, and no deaths. There were 205 (95%) successfully managed without hospital admission. Among surveyed patients, 96% felt they had concerns adequately addressed in a timely manner. In conclusion, our rapid-access cardiology clinic is a safe model for outpatient management of a range of cardiovascular presentations to the ED.

摘要

心脏病理学在急诊科就诊病例中占相当大的比例。许多病例可作为紧急门诊患者进行处理,避免住院治疗。我们评估了一种新型的快速通道普通心脏病诊所,该诊所在新冠疫情期间实施。我们对电子记录中的基线特征、检查、最终诊断以及90天安全性(再入院、主要不良心血管事件[MACE]、死亡率)进行了回顾性分析,并开展了患者体验调查。2020年6月1日至10月30日期间有216例来自急诊科的转诊患者。复查的中位时间为两天(四分位间距1 - 5天)。90天时,有3例(1.4%)再次就诊需要住院,2例(0.9%)发生主要不良心血管事件,无死亡病例。205例(95%)患者未住院即成功处理。在接受调查的患者中,96%认为他们的担忧得到了及时充分的解决。总之,我们的快速通道心脏病诊所是对急诊科一系列心血管疾病表现进行门诊管理的安全模式。

相似文献

1
Safety outcomes of suspected cardiac pathology assessed in an ambulatory rapid-access cardiology clinic.在门诊快速通道心脏病诊所评估的疑似心脏病理的安全结果。
Br J Cardiol. 2024 Apr 16;31(2):017. doi: 10.5837/bjc.2024.017. eCollection 2024.
2
Can ED chest pain patients with intermediate HEART scores be managed as outpatients?ED 胸痛且 HEART 评分处于中间范围的患者能否作为门诊患者进行管理?
CJEM. 2022 Nov;24(7):770-779. doi: 10.1007/s43678-022-00355-4. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
3
Evaluating the benefits of a rapid access chest pain clinic in Australia.评估澳大利亚快速通道胸痛诊所的效益。
Med J Aust. 2019 Apr;210(7):321-325. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50021. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
4
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department attendances and acute medical admissions.COVID-19 大流行对急诊科就诊人次和急性内科收治的影响。
BMC Emerg Med. 2021 Nov 20;21(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00529-w.
5
Retrospective cohort study evaluating the efficacy and safety of an orthopaedic consultant-led virtual fracture clinic in an Australian level 1 trauma centre.回顾性队列研究评估了在澳大利亚一级创伤中心由骨科顾问主导的虚拟骨折门诊的疗效和安全性。
ANZ J Surg. 2021 Jul;91(7-8):1441-1446. doi: 10.1111/ans.16574. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
6
Impact of an Outpatient Cardiology-managed Urgent Access and Observation Unit on Hospital Admissions.门诊心脏病学管理的紧急就诊与观察单元对住院率的影响
Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2019 Sep;18(3):113-120. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000186.
7
Association of a Novel Electronic Form for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment With Reduction in Cardiac Consultations and Testing: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于术前心脏风险评估的新型电子表格与心脏会诊及检查减少之间的关联:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Perioper Med. 2024 Sep 13;7:e63076. doi: 10.2196/63076.
8
Optimising Cardiology Ambulatory Care Pathways: A Comprehensive Approach to Admission Avoidance and Timely Intervention in a Post-Pandemic Healthcare Landscape.优化心脏病学门诊护理路径:在后疫情医疗保健环境下,避免住院和及时干预的综合方法。
Acute Med. 2024;23(2):58-62.
9
Impact of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus Disease Pandemic on the Performance of a Cardiovascular Department in a Non-epidemic Center in Beijing, China.2019新型冠状病毒病大流行对中国北京一个非疫情中心的心血管内科运行的影响
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Feb 18;8:630816. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.630816. eCollection 2021.
10
Early emergency department discharge for intermediate heart score patients presenting for chest pain.因胸痛就诊的中度心脏风险评分患者的早期急诊科出院。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2023 Sep 9;4(5):e13037. doi: 10.1002/emp2.13037. eCollection 2023 Oct.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of patients discharged from the Rapid Access Chest Pain Clinic with non-anginal chest pain: A retrospective cohort study.快速就诊胸痛诊所因非心绞痛经治疗后出院患者的临床结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Cardiol. 2020 Mar 1;302:1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.12.008. Epub 2019 Dec 6.
2
First time referral reasons, diagnoses and 10-year follow-up of patients seen at a Dutch fast lane outpatient cardiology clinic.荷兰快速通道门诊心脏病诊所患者的首次转诊原因、诊断及10年随访情况
Neth Heart J. 2019 Jul;27(7-8):354-361. doi: 10.1007/s12471-019-1266-x.
3
Description of chest pain patients in a Norwegian emergency department.挪威一家急诊科胸痛患者的描述。
Scand Cardiovasc J. 2019 Feb;53(1):28-34. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2019.1583362. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
4
Rapid-access cardiology services: can these reduce the burden of acute chest pain on Australian and New Zealand health services?快速通道心脏病服务:这些服务能否减轻澳大利亚和新西兰医疗服务体系中急性胸痛的负担?
Intern Med J. 2017 Sep;47(9):986-991. doi: 10.1111/imj.13334.
5
SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process.SQUIRE 2.0(卓越质量改进报告标准):通过详细的共识过程制定的修订版出版指南。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Dec;25(12):986-992. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004411. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
6
Chief complaints in medical emergencies: do they relate to underlying disease and outcome? The Charité Emergency Medicine Study (CHARITEM).医疗急救中的主要症状:它们与潜在疾病和结果有关吗?Charité 急诊医学研究(CHARITEM)。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2013 Apr;20(2):103-8. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328351e609.
7
Rapid access cardiology--a nine year review.快速心脏科诊疗--九年回顾。
QJM. 2012 Mar;105(3):231-4. doi: 10.1093/qjmed/hcr182. Epub 2011 Oct 5.
8
Value of rapid-access chest pain clinics.快速胸痛诊所的价值。
Heart. 2007 Apr;93(4):415-6. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2006.100248.
9
A rapid access cardiology service for chest pain, heart failure and arrhythmias accurately diagnoses cardiac disease and identifies patients at high risk: a prospective cohort study.一项针对胸痛、心力衰竭和心律失常的快速心脏病诊疗服务能准确诊断心脏病并识别高危患者:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Heart. 2006 Aug;92(8):1084-90. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2005.079376. Epub 2005 Dec 30.
10
The health care burden of acute chest pain.急性胸痛的医疗负担。
Heart. 2005 Feb;91(2):229-30. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2003.027599.