Wazni Oussama M, Saliba Walid I, Nair Devi G, Marijon Eloi, Schmidt Boris, Hounshell Troy, Ebelt Henning, Skurk Carsten, Oza Saumil, Patel Chinmay, Kanagasundram Arvindh, Sadhu Ashish, Sundaram Sri, Osorio Jose, Mark George, Gupta Madhukar, DeLurgio David B, Olson Jeffrey, Nielsen-Kudsk Jens Erik, Boersma Lucas V A, Healey Jeff S, Phillips Karen P, Asch Federico M, Wolski Katherine, Roy Kristine, Christen Thomas, Sutton Brad S, Stein Kenneth M, Reddy Vivek Y
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland.
St. Bernards Medical Center and Arrhythmia Research Group, Jonesboro, AR.
N Engl J Med. 2025 Apr 3;392(13):1277-1287. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2408308. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
Oral anticoagulation is recommended after ablation for atrial fibrillation among patients at high risk for stroke. Left atrial appendage closure is a mechanical alternative to anticoagulation, but data regarding its use after atrial fibrillation ablation are lacking.
We conducted an international randomized trial involving 1600 patients with atrial fibrillation who had an elevated score (≥2 in men and ≥3 in women) on the CHADS-VASc scale (range, 0 to 9, with higher scores indicating a greater risk of stroke) and who underwent catheter ablation. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo left atrial appendage closure or receive oral anticoagulation. The primary safety end point, tested for superiority, was non-procedure-related major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. The primary efficacy end point, tested for noninferiority, was a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. The secondary end point, tested for noninferiority, was major bleeding, including procedure-related bleeding, through 36 months.
A total of 803 patients were assigned to undergo left atrial appendage closure, and 797 to receive anticoagulant therapy. The mean (±SD) age of the patients was 69.6±7.7 years, 34.1% of the patients were women, and the mean CHADS-VASc score was 3.5±1.3. At 36 months, a primary safety end-point event had occurred in 65 patients (8.5%) in the left atrial appendage closure group (device group) and in 137 patients (18.1%) in the anticoagulation group (P<0.001 for superiority); a primary efficacy end-point event had occurred in 41 patients (5.3%) and 44 patients (5.8%), respectively (P<0.001 for noninferiority); and a secondary end-point event had occurred in 3.9% and 5.0% (P<0.001 for noninferiority). Complications related to the appendage closure device or procedure occurred in 23 patients.
Among patients who underwent catheter-based atrial fibrillation ablation, left atrial appendage closure was associated with a lower risk of non-procedure-related major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding than oral anticoagulation and was noninferior to oral anticoagulation with respect to a composite of death from any cause, stroke, or systemic embolism at 36 months. (Funded by Boston Scientific; OPTION ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03795298.).
对于卒中高危的心房颤动患者,推荐在消融术后进行口服抗凝治疗。左心耳封堵术是一种抗凝的机械替代方法,但关于其在心房颤动消融术后应用的数据尚缺乏。
我们进行了一项国际随机试验,纳入1600例心房颤动患者,这些患者在CHADS-VASc量表上得分升高(男性≥2分,女性≥3分)(范围为0至9分,分数越高表明卒中风险越大)且接受了导管消融。患者按1:1比例随机分配接受左心耳封堵术或口服抗凝治疗。主要安全性终点用于检验优效性,为非手术相关的大出血或临床相关非大出血。主要有效性终点用于检验非劣效性,为36个月时任何原因导致的死亡、卒中或全身性栓塞的复合终点。次要终点用于检验非劣效性,为36个月时的大出血,包括与手术相关的出血。
共有803例患者被分配接受左心耳封堵术,797例接受抗凝治疗。患者的平均(±标准差)年龄为69.6±7.7岁,34.1%为女性,平均CHADS-VASc评分为3.5±1.3。在36个月时,左心耳封堵组(器械组)65例患者(8.5%)发生了主要安全性终点事件,抗凝组137例患者(18.1%)发生了该事件(优效性检验,P<0.001);主要有效性终点事件分别在41例患者(5.3%)和44例患者(5.8%)中发生(非劣效性检验,P<0.001);次要终点事件分别在3.9%和5.0%的患者中发生(非劣效性检验,P<0.001)。23例患者发生了与心耳封堵器械或手术相关的并发症。
在接受导管消融的心房颤动患者中,与口服抗凝治疗相比,左心耳封堵术与非手术相关的大出血或临床相关非大出血风险较低相关,并且在36个月时,在任何原因导致的死亡、卒中或全身性栓塞的复合终点方面不劣于口服抗凝治疗。(由波士顿科学公司资助;OPTION临床试验注册号,NCT03795298。)