Boháčková Jana, Cajthaml Tomáš
Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic.
Institute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague, Benátská 2, 128 01 Prague, Czech Republic; Institute of Microbiology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Vídeňská 1083, 142 20 Prague, Czech Republic.
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Dec 20;957:177611. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177611. Epub 2024 Nov 24.
Nanoplastics and microplastics are of growing research interest due to their persistence in the environment and potential harm to organisms through physical damage, such as abrasions or blockages, and chemical harm from leached additives and contaminants. Despite extensive research, a clear distinction between the physical and chemical toxicity of plastic particles has been lacking. This study addresses this gap by reviewing studies examining both toxicity types, focusing on environmentally relevant leachates. The chemicals used in plastics manufacturing, which number over 16,000, include additives, processing aids, and monomers, many of which pose potential hazards due to their toxicity, persistence, and bioaccumulation. Studies typically use extraction or leaching methods to assess chemical toxicity, with leaching more closely mimicking environmental conditions. Factors influencing leaching include plastic type, particle size, and environmental conditions. A systematic literature search identified 35 relevant studies that assessed the toxicity of plastic particle suspensions and their leachates. Analysis revealed that, in 52 % of the cases, both the suspension and leachate had toxic effects, while in 35 % of the cases, toxicity was attributed to the suspension alone. At 13 %, only the leachate was toxic. This suggests that leachates contribute significantly to overall toxicity. However, the results vary widely depending on the experimental conditions and plastic type, highlighting the complexity of microplastic toxicity. The preparation methods used for leachates significantly influence toxicity results. Factors such as leaching time, particle size, and separation techniques affect the concentration and presence of toxic chemicals. Additionally, washed particles-those subjected to procedures for removing leachable chemicals-often showed reduced toxicity, although the results varied. This underscores the need for standardized methods to compare studies better and understand the relative contributions of physical and chemical toxicity to microplastic pollution.
纳米塑料和微塑料越来越受到研究关注,因为它们在环境中持久存在,并可能通过物理损伤(如擦伤或堵塞)以及浸出添加剂和污染物造成的化学危害对生物体产生潜在危害。尽管进行了广泛研究,但塑料颗粒的物理毒性和化学毒性之间一直缺乏明确区分。本研究通过回顾考察这两种毒性类型的研究来填补这一空白,重点关注与环境相关的浸出液。塑料制造中使用的化学品有16000多种,包括添加剂、加工助剂和单体,其中许多因其毒性、持久性和生物累积性而具有潜在危害。研究通常使用萃取或浸出方法来评估化学毒性,浸出更能模拟环境条件。影响浸出的因素包括塑料类型、颗粒大小和环境条件。一项系统的文献检索确定了35项相关研究,这些研究评估了塑料颗粒悬浮液及其浸出液的毒性。分析表明,在52%的案例中悬浮液和浸出液都具有毒性作用,而在35%的案例中,毒性仅归因于悬浮液。在13%的案例中,只有浸出液有毒。这表明浸出液对总体毒性有显著贡献。然而,结果因实验条件和塑料类型而异,突出了微塑料毒性的复杂性。浸出液的制备方法对毒性结果有显著影响。浸出时间、颗粒大小和分离技术等因素会影响有毒化学品的浓度和存在情况。此外,经过清洗以去除可浸出化学品的颗粒(即经过去除可浸出化学品程序的颗粒)通常毒性降低,尽管结果各不相同。这强调了需要标准化方法来更好地比较研究,并了解物理毒性和化学毒性对微塑料污染的相对贡献。