Suppr超能文献

为流行病学目的评估对常见变应原的过敏敏感性时的皮肤反应性和特异性IgE水平。

Skin reactivity and specific IgE levels in the evaluation of allergic sensitivity to common allergens for epidemiological purposes.

作者信息

Paggiaro P L, Bacci E, Amram D L, Rossi O, Talini D

出版信息

Clin Allergy. 1986 Jan;16(1):49-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1986.tb01953.x.

Abstract

An investigation was conducted to test the validity of the skin-prick test (SPT) with eleven common allergens (Lofarma series proposed by Italian National Research Council for epidemiological studies) as a method for predicting the presence of specific antibodies in serum. The relationship between SPT, evaluated by two different methods (MWD = mean weal diameter, AHWR = allergen histamine weal ratio), and specific IgE levels (RAST) has been investigated in 101 patients tested consecutively for suspected allergic disease. Sensitivity, specificity and overall efficiency were assessed for different criteria of SPT positivity (greater than or equal to 4 mm or greater than or equal to 5 mm using MWD; ++ or using AHWR). For pollens and moulds, a weal diameter greater than or equal to 5 mm gave better results than 4 mm, whereas for mites a MWD greater than or equal to 4 mm showed a better sensitivity and overall efficiency than 5 mm. Danders showed low sensitivity when either 5 or 4 mm criterion was considered. AHWR evaluation gave no better results, except for animal danders. Correlation coefficients between weal size and RAST class showed a good relationship for mites and pollens using both methods of SPT evaluation; a moderate relationship was observed with MWD criterion for moulds and with AHWR for danders. We conclude that a weal diameter greater than or equal to 5 mm can be assumed to to predict RAST positivity for pollens and moulds, and for mites, a weal greater than or equal to 4 mm can be a more accurate criterion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

开展了一项调查,以检验使用11种常见变应原(意大利国家研究委员会为流行病学研究提议的罗法马系列)进行皮肤点刺试验(SPT)作为预测血清中特异性抗体存在方法的有效性。在101例因疑似过敏性疾病而连续接受检测的患者中,研究了通过两种不同方法评估的SPT(MWD = 平均风团直径,AHWR = 变应原组胺风团比率)与特异性IgE水平(RAST)之间的关系。针对SPT阳性的不同标准(使用MWD时大于或等于4 mm或大于或等于5 mm;使用AHWR时为++)评估了敏感性、特异性和总体效率。对于花粉和霉菌,风团直径大于或等于5 mm比4 mm的结果更好,而对于螨,MWD大于或等于4 mm比5 mm显示出更好的敏感性和总体效率。当考虑5 mm或4 mm标准时,皮屑的敏感性较低。除动物皮屑外,AHWR评估未得出更好的结果。使用两种SPT评估方法时,风团大小与RAST分级之间的相关系数显示,螨和花粉之间存在良好关系;对于霉菌,使用MWD标准时观察到中等关系,对于皮屑,使用AHWR时观察到中等关系。我们得出结论,风团直径大于或等于5 mm可被认为能预测花粉和霉菌的RAST阳性,对于螨,风团大于或等于4 mm可能是更准确的标准。(摘要截断于250字)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验