Suppr超能文献

估算英国卫生技术评估(HTA)的住院费用:系统文献回顾和最佳实践框架。

Estimating hospitalization costs for Health Technology Appraisals (HTA) in England: a systematic literature review and best practice framework.

机构信息

Independent Health Economist, Sydney, Australia.

Pfizer Ltd, Tadworth, UK.

出版信息

J Med Econ. 2024 Jan-Dec;27(1):1558-1568. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2024.2430127. Epub 2024 Nov 27.

Abstract

AIMS

Reporting of hospitalization cost data for the National Health Service in England evolved substantially in the past decades which may have led to inconsistency in capturing the average cost of hospitalizations in appraisals of new health technologies. Our aim was to systematically review the estimation of hospitalization costs in appraisals for the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), to identify potential heterogeneity and its drivers. A case study was used to explore the impact of alternative cost estimates on economic evaluations.

METHODS

Systematic review of past NICE appraisals and published economic evaluations to inform the JCVI. Hospitalization cost data reported in each appraisal were extracted and separately re-calculated to inform descriptive analysis and linear regression. Deterministic sensitivity analysis was performed on an existing cost-effectiveness model of pneumococcal disease in adults, and a best practice framework was developed to support standardization of cost estimation in future appraisals.

RESULTS

Length of stay (LoS) was accounted for in 4/118 (3.38%) currency codes across 29 appraisals. LoS and adjustment for complication and comorbidity score were key drivers of differences between cost estimates. There was a statistically significant negative average cost difference of -£1,235 (reported cost < calculated cost) for when accounting for LoS or not. On average, the range of reported costs overestimated hospitalization costs at minimum by £1,511 and underestimated these at maximum by £6,566, suggesting high levels of heterogeneity. In the case study, using spell costs resulted in estimating greater cost savings with the new technology which became dominant compared to the standard of care.

CONCLUSIONS

Results show high heterogeneity in the estimation of hospitalization costs across appraisals in England over the past decade. More detailed HTA guidance may potentially increase consistency among appraisals of new health technologies.

摘要

目的

在过去的几十年中,英国国民保健制度(NHS)的住院费用报告发生了重大变化,这可能导致在评估新的卫生技术时,无法一致地捕捉住院的平均费用。我们的目的是系统地审查英国国民保健制度评估中心(NICE)和联合疫苗接种和免疫评估委员会(JCVI)的住院费用评估,以确定潜在的异质性及其驱动因素。采用案例研究来探讨替代成本估算对经济评估的影响。

方法

对过去的 NICE 评估和已发表的经济评估进行系统回顾,为 JCVI 提供信息。从每个评估中提取并单独重新计算报告的住院费用数据,以进行描述性分析和线性回归。对成人肺炎球菌病的现有成本效益模型进行确定性敏感性分析,并制定最佳实践框架,以支持未来评估中成本估算的标准化。

结果

在 29 项评估中,有 4/118(3.38%)货币代码中考虑了住院时间(LoS)。LoS 和并发症和合并症评分调整是成本估算差异的关键驱动因素。当考虑或不考虑 LoS 时,平均而言,报告的成本有一个统计学上显著的负平均成本差异-£1235(报告的成本<计算的成本)。平均而言,报告的成本范围至少高估了住院费用 1511 英镑,最多低估了 6566 英镑,表明存在高度的异质性。在案例研究中,使用疗程成本导致新的技术估计节省了更多的成本,与标准护理相比,新技术变得更具优势。

结论

结果表明,在过去十年中,英国评估中心对住院费用的估计存在高度的异质性。更详细的 HTA 指南可能会增加新卫生技术评估之间的一致性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验