Lam Keng, Calderon Kary M, Boatright Dowin, Kim Jung G
Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Health Systems Science, Kaiser Permanente, Pasadena, USA.
Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71877. eCollection 2024 Oct.
Background Scholarly activity by trainees is required for US-accredited graduate medical education (GME) programs. Several factors, including financial barriers to open access (OA) journals, may impact trainees' successful completion of scholarly activity, but little is known to what extent, particularly for neurology trainees. Method The authors implemented a cross-sectional, web-based 17-item survey of US-accredited neurology residency and fellowship programs during the 2022-2023 academic year. Participant responses for producing scholarly activity during GME were analyzed by mixed methods and examined by trainee motivation and perceived barriers, available institutional research support, and OA awareness and compared against socio-demographics (i.e., disadvantaged status history, underrepresented in medicine (URiM) status, international medical school graduate (IMG)) and prior research experience. Results Seventy-two respondents from 63 neurology programs completed the survey. Participants represented all US census regions and mostly from academic health centers and in advanced years of training. Overall, 17 (23.6%) self-reported as URiM and 20 (27.8%) as an IMG. Sixty-two (86.1%) were familiar with OA. Prior publications were associated with OA awareness (X = 5.3, p<0.05), and 27 (37.5%) reported financial barriers to publishing. IMGs reported less motivation to publish based on a journal's impact factor (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-0.65, p<0.01) but were nearly 5 times more likely to report financial barriers to OA publishing (OR = 4.62, 95% CI 1.31-16.80, p<0.01). Trainees successfully publishing while training reported prior research experience (OR = 7.27, 95% CI 1.71-42.64, p<0.05) and access to mentors (OR = 4.67, 95% CI 1.52-14.64, p<0.001). Dedicated time for scholarly activity and publishing were reported as significant barriers in open-ended responses. Conclusions One-third of the study participants reported financial barriers to publishing scholarship, with these barriers disproportionately affecting IMGs. Prior research experience and access to mentors were associated with a higher likelihood of publishing.
背景 美国认可的研究生医学教育(GME)项目要求学员开展学术活动。包括开放获取(OA)期刊的经济障碍在内的几个因素可能会影响学员学术活动的顺利完成,但对于影响程度知之甚少,尤其是对神经科住院医师和专科培训学员而言。方法 作者在2022 - 2023学年对美国认可的神经科住院医师培训和专科培训项目开展了一项基于网络的横断面17项调查。采用混合方法分析了学员在GME期间开展学术活动的回答,并按学员动机和感知障碍、机构可用的研究支持以及OA意识进行考察,并与社会人口统计学特征(即弱势地位历史、医学领域代表性不足(URiM)状况、国际医学院毕业生(IMG))和既往研究经验进行比较。结果 来自63个神经科项目的72名受访者完成了调查。参与者代表了美国所有的人口普查区域,大多来自学术健康中心且处于培训后期。总体而言,17人(23.6%)自我报告为URiM,20人(27.8%)为IMG。62人(86.1%)熟悉OA。既往发表情况与OA意识相关(X = 5.3,p<0.05),27人(37.5%)报告了发表的经济障碍。IMG基于期刊影响因子报告的发表动机较低(优势比[OR] = 0.15,95%置信区间[CI],0.03 - 0.65,p<0.01),但报告OA发表经济障碍的可能性几乎高出5倍(OR = 4.62,95% CI 1.31 - 16.80,p<0.01)。在培训期间成功发表的学员报告有既往研究经验(OR = 7.27,95% CI 1.71 - 42.64,p<0.05)以及有导师指导(OR = 4.67,95% CI 1.52 - 14.64,p<0.001)。在开放式回答中,报告开展学术活动和发表的专用时间是重大障碍。结论 三分之一的研究参与者报告了发表学术成果的经济障碍,这些障碍对IMG的影响尤为严重。既往研究经验和有导师指导与发表的可能性较高相关。