• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Open access publishers: The new players.开放获取出版商:新的参与者。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0233432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233432. eCollection 2020.
2
Predatory Publishing in Orthopaedic Research.骨科学术研究中的掠夺性出版。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2018 Nov 7;100(21):e138. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.17.01569.
3
Predatory open-access publishing in critical care medicine.危重病医学中的掠夺性开放获取出版。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:247-249. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.12.016. Epub 2018 Dec 29.
4
Predatory Open-Access Publishing in Anesthesiology.麻醉学领域的掠夺性开放获取出版。
Anesth Analg. 2019 Jan;128(1):182-187. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000003803.
5
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
6
Open access versus subscription journals: a comparison of scientific impact.开放获取期刊与订阅期刊:科学影响力比较。
BMC Med. 2012 Jul 17;10:73. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-10-73.
7
[The different models of scientific journals].[科学期刊的不同模式]
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Dec 8;3(4). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.454. eCollection 2023 Dec 31.
8
[Predatory journals: how their publishers operate and how to avoid them].[掠夺性期刊:其出版商的运作方式以及如何避开它们]
Vnitr Lek. 2017 Winter;63(1):5-13.
9
The emerging landscape of scientific publishing.科学出版的新兴格局。
Clin Biochem. 2017 Aug;50(12):651-655. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.04.009. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
10
Inexpensive Research in the Golden Open-Access Era.黄金开放获取时代的廉价研究。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2018 May;33(5):301-303. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.02.005. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Scholarly publishing's hidden diversity: How exclusive databases sustain the oligopoly of academic publishers.学术出版业隐藏的多样性:独家数据库如何维系学术出版商的寡头垄断。
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 26;20(6):e0327015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0327015. eCollection 2025.
2
Barriers to Publishing Scholarship: A Study on Neurology Physician Residents and Fellows.发表学术成果的障碍:一项关于神经科住院医师和研究员的研究
Cureus. 2024 Oct 19;16(10):e71877. doi: 10.7759/cureus.71877. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Reading Between the Lines: Navigating Nuance in Medical Literature to Optimize Clinical Decision-Making and Health Care Outcomes.字里行间的解读:在医学文献中把握细微差别以优化临床决策和医疗保健结果。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2023 Oct 19;14:1167-1176. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S427663. eCollection 2023.
4
Monitoring the transition to open access through its mode of implementation: A principal component analysis of two surveys.通过实施方式监测向开放获取的转变:对两项调查的主成分分析。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 11;17(7):e0271215. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0271215. eCollection 2022.
5
The effect of data sources on the measurement of open access: A comparison of Dimensions and the Web of Science.数据源对开放获取测量的影响:Dimensions 与 Web of Science 的比较。
PLoS One. 2022 Mar 31;17(3):e0265545. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265545. eCollection 2022.
6
Open Access Fees: A Barrier to Scholarly Activity Among Neurology Trainees.开放获取费用:神经病学实习生学术活动的障碍。
Perm J. 2021 Nov 29;25:21.041. doi: 10.7812/TPP/21.041.
7
Progress in human ovarian rejuvenation: Current platelet-rich plasma and condensed cytokine research activity by scope and international origin.人类卵巢年轻化研究进展:当前富血小板血浆和浓缩细胞因子研究的范围及国际研究动态
Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2021 Dec;48(4):311-315. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2021.04651. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

1
The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles.开放获取(OA)的现状:对开放获取文章的患病率和影响的大规模分析。
PeerJ. 2018 Feb 13;6:e4375. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4375. eCollection 2018.
2
Knowledge sharing in global health research - the impact, uptake and cost of open access to scholarly literature.全球卫生研究中的知识共享——学术文献开放获取的影响、应用及成本
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Aug 29;15(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0235-3.
3
'Predatory' open access: a longitudinal study of article volumes and market characteristics.“掠夺性”开放获取:文章数量与市场特征的纵向研究
BMC Med. 2015 Oct 1;13:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-015-0469-2.
4
The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era.数字时代学术出版商的寡头垄断
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 10;10(6):e0127502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502. eCollection 2015.
5
Open access to the scientific journal literature: situation 2009.开放获取科学期刊文献:2009 年状况
PLoS One. 2010 Jun 23;5(6):e11273. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011273.

开放获取出版商:新的参与者。

Open access publishers: The new players.

机构信息

Graduate Programa of Library and Information Science, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.

Department of Librarianship, Information Science and Audiovisual Communication, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Jun 5;15(6):e0233432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233432. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0233432
PMID:32502146
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7274412/
Abstract

The essential role of journals as registries of scientific activity in all areas of knowledge justifies concern about their ownership and type of access. The purpose of this research is to analyze the main characteristics of publishers with journals that have received the DOAJ Seal. The specific objectives are a) to identify publishers and journals registered with the DOAJ Seal; b) to characterize those publishers; and c) to analyze their article processing fees. The research method involved the use of the DOAJ database, the Seal option and the following indicators: publisher, title, country, number of articles, knowledge area, article processing charges in USD, time for publication in weeks, and year of indexing in DOAJ. The results reveal a fast-rising oligopoly, dominated by Springer with 35% of the titles and PLOS with more than 20% of the articles. We've identified three models of expansion: a) a few titles with hundreds of articles; b) a high number of titles with a mix of big and small journals; and c) a high number of titles with medium-size journals. We identify a high number of titles without APCs (27%) in all areas while medicine was found to be the most expensive area. Commercial publishers clearly exercise control over the scope of journals and the creation of new titles, according to the interests of their companies, which are not necessarily the same as those of the scientific community or of society in general.

摘要

期刊作为记录各个知识领域科学活动的重要载体,其所有权和访问类型引发了人们的关注。本研究旨在分析获得 DOAJ 认证的期刊出版商的主要特征。具体目标包括:a)识别获得 DOAJ 认证的出版商和期刊;b)对这些出版商进行特征描述;c)分析其文章处理费。研究方法涉及使用 DOAJ 数据库、Seal 选项和以下指标:出版商、标题、国家、文章数量、知识领域、以美元计算的文章处理费、出版周期(以周为单位)以及在 DOAJ 中的索引年份。研究结果揭示了一个快速崛起的寡头垄断市场,其中 Springer 以 35%的期刊标题和 PLOS 超过 20%的文章占据主导地位。我们已经确定了三种扩展模式:a)少数几个标题拥有数百篇文章;b)大量标题,其中包含大小期刊的混合;c)大量标题与中等规模期刊相结合。我们发现所有领域都有相当数量的标题没有收取 APC(27%),而医学领域是最昂贵的领域。商业出版商根据其公司的利益,显然对期刊的范围和新标题的创建进行了控制,这些利益不一定与科学界或整个社会的利益一致。