• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰骶固定装置的比较。

Comparison of lumbosacral fixation devices.

作者信息

Ogilvie J W, Schendel M

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb(203):120-5.

PMID:3955973
Abstract

Fusion of L4 and L5 to the sacrum has a high incidence of success. Using conventional methods, nonunion is common when long scoliosis fusions are extended to the sacrum. Three methods of instrumentation for fusing the lumbar spine to the sacrum were compared on a spine simulator test stand. Harrington distraction rods from the sacral ala to L1, Luque rods from L1 to the sacrum, and Harrington compression rods from L1 to the sacrum were tested. The use of a spine instrumentation test stand discounted biologic variation in spinal structure. Sequential loading of each test stand-instrumentation construct in torsion, flexion, extension, and lateral bending gave stiffness constants (Ks) for each test mode. Test values had reproducibility of greater than 94%. Ks illustrates the inability of Harrington distraction rods to the sacrum to resist flexion and torsion, but the ability to resist lateral bend and extension. Harrington compression rod and Luque rod constructs have equivalent stiffness in flexion and torsion. Harrington compression rods efficiently resist extension, and Luque rods resist lateral bending. Harrington distraction rods have limited use in lumbosacral junction fixation other than to correct and resist lateral bending.

摘要

L4和L5与骶骨融合的成功率很高。采用传统方法时,当长节段脊柱侧弯融合延伸至骶骨时,不愈合很常见。在脊柱模拟器试验台上比较了三种将腰椎与骶骨融合的器械固定方法。测试了从骶骨翼到L1的哈灵顿撑开棒、从L1到骶骨的鲁克棒以及从L1到骶骨的哈灵顿加压棒。使用脊柱器械固定试验台消除了脊柱结构中的生物变异。对每个试验台器械固定结构依次进行扭转、前屈、后伸和侧方弯曲加载,得出每种测试模式的刚度常数(Ks)。测试值的重现性大于94%。Ks表明,到骶骨的哈灵顿撑开棒无法抵抗前屈和扭转,但能够抵抗侧方弯曲和后伸。哈灵顿加压棒和鲁克棒结构在前屈和扭转方面具有相同的刚度。哈灵顿加压棒能有效抵抗后伸,鲁克棒能抵抗侧方弯曲。除了矫正和抵抗侧方弯曲外,哈灵顿撑开棒在腰骶部固定中的应用有限。

相似文献

1
Comparison of lumbosacral fixation devices.腰骶固定装置的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb(203):120-5.
2
Lumbosacral fusions with Harrington rods and intersegmental wiring.使用哈灵顿棒和节段间钢丝进行腰骶融合术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb(203):185-90.
3
Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw-plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model.使用前路腰骶固定螺钉钢板进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的生物力学评估:与单纯腰椎前路椎间融合术及在不稳定人体尸体模型中使用椎弓根螺钉进行腰椎前路椎间融合术的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Apr 1;31(7):762-8. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2.
4
Stability of the lumbar spine and method of instrumentation.腰椎稳定性及内固定方法。
Acta Orthop Belg. 1993;59(2):175-80.
5
The Galveston technique using Luque or Cotrel-Dubousset rods.
Orthop Clin North Am. 1994 Apr;25(2):311-20.
6
Internal fixation in lumbosacral spine fusion. A biomechanical and clinical study.腰骶椎融合术中的内固定。一项生物力学与临床研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb(203):141-50.
7
Unilateral and bilateral sacropelvic fixation result in similar construct biomechanics.单侧和双侧骶骨盆固定导致相似的结构生物力学。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Sep 15;33(20):2127-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817bd8d5.
8
Biomechanical testing of a novel four-rod technique for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction.一种用于腰骶骨盆重建的新型四棒技术的生物力学测试
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 1;33(13):E400-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817615c5.
9
Biomechanical comparison of lumbosacral fixation using Luque-Galveston and Colorado II sacropelvic fixation: advantage of using locked proximal fixation.使用Luque-Galveston法和Colorado II型骶骨盆固定法进行腰骶固定的生物力学比较:使用近端锁定固定的优势
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Jun 15;30(12):1396-401. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000166530.87923.5b.
10
Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.增强腰椎前路椎间融合术的稳定性:前路钢板与后路经椎弓根内固定器械的生物力学比较
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jan 15;33(2):E38-43. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181604644.

引用本文的文献

1
Historical Perspectives on the Evolution of Spino-Pelvic Fixation and its Implications on Clinical Care A Narrative Review.脊柱骨盆固定术演变的历史视角及其对临床护理的影响:一项叙述性综述
Global Spine J. 2025 Jan;15(1):228-240. doi: 10.1177/21925682241283726. Epub 2024 Sep 11.
2
Straight-Forward versus Bicortical Fixation Penetrating Endplate in Lumbosacral Fixation-A Biomechanical Study.直入式与双皮质固定穿透终板在腰骶部固定中的生物力学研究
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2018 Mar;61(2):180-185. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2017.0404.004. Epub 2018 Feb 28.
3
Free-hand placement of iliac screws for spinopelvic fixation based on anatomical landmarks: technical note.
基于解剖标志徒手置入髂骨螺钉用于脊柱骨盆固定:技术说明
Int J Spine Surg. 2014 Dec 1;8. doi: 10.14444/1003. eCollection 2014.
4
Rh-BMP-2 for L5-S1 arthrodesis in long fusions to the pelvis for neuromuscular spinal deformity in the pediatric age group: analysis of 11 patients.小儿年龄组神经肌肉性脊柱畸形长节段融合至骨盆的 L5-S1 关节融合术中使用重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2:11 例患者分析
Childs Nerv Syst. 2014 Feb;30(2):249-55. doi: 10.1007/s00381-013-2221-6. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
5
Biomechanical effects of polyaxial pedicle screw fixation on the lumbosacral segments with an anterior interbody cage support.前路椎间融合器支撑下多轴椎弓根螺钉固定对腰骶段的生物力学影响
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2007 Mar 10;8:28. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-8-28.