Müller Philip C, Kuemmerli Christoph, Billeter Adrian T, Shen Baiyong, Jin Jiabin, Nickel Felix, Guidetti Cristiano, Kauffmann Emanuele, Purchla Julia, Tschuor Christoph, Krohn Paul Suno, Burgdorf Stefan K, Jonas Jan Philipp, Bussmann Felix J, Saint-Marc Olivier, Iben-Khayat Abdallah, Andel Paul C M, Molenaar Izaak Quintus, Wellner Ulrich, Keck Tobias, Moeckli Beat, Toso Christian, Di Benedetto Fabrizio, Valle Valentina, Giulianotti Pier, Roulin Didier, Martinie John B, Rama Martina, Lavu Harish, Yeo Charles, Mavani Parit T, Shah Mihir M, Kooby David A, He Jin, Boggi Ugo, Hackert Thilo, Borel-Rinkes Inne H M, Müller Beat P, Clavien Pierre-Alain
Department of Surgery, Clarunis University Digestive Health Care Center, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Department of General Surgery, Pancreatic Disease Center, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China; Research Institute of Pancreatic Diseases, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Ann Surg. 2024 Nov 19. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006592.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the different phases of the learning curve for robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) in international expert centers.
RDP is an emerging minimally invasive approach; however, only limited, mostly single center data are available on its safe implementation, including the learning curve.
Consecutive patients undergoing elective RDP from 16 expert centers across three continents were included to assess the learning curve. Based on the first 100 RDPs at each center, three cutoffs were used to define the learning curve: operative time for competency, major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥III) for proficiency, and textbook outcome for mastery. Clinical outcomes before and after the cutoffs were compared.
The learning curve analysis was conducted on 1109 of 2403 RDPs. Competency, proficiency, and mastery, respectively, were reached after 46, 63, and 73 RDP procedures. After competency, operative time decreased from 245 to 235 minutes (P=0.002). Attaining proficiency was reflected by a reduction in the rate of major complications from 20% to 15% (P=0.012), and mastery was associated with a higher proportion of patients with textbook outcome (71% vs. 63%; P=0.028). The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate remained stable along the learning curve, ranging between 18.5% and 21.5%. Previous laparoscopic experience accelerated the learning process by virtue of reduced operative time and an earlier decrease in major complications.
Competency, proficiency, and mastery for RDP were reached after 46, 63, and 73 procedures, respectively, at international expert centers. The findings highlight that the learning curves for intraoperative parameters are completed earlier; however, extensive experience is needed to master RDP.
本研究旨在评估国际专家中心机器人远端胰腺切除术(RDP)学习曲线的不同阶段。
RDP是一种新兴的微创方法;然而,关于其安全实施,包括学习曲线,仅有有限的、大多为单中心的数据。
纳入来自三大洲16个专家中心接受择期RDP的连续患者,以评估学习曲线。根据每个中心的前100例RDP,使用三个分界点来定义学习曲线:达到胜任水平的手术时间、达到熟练水平的主要并发症(Clavien-Dindo分级≥III级)以及达到精通水平的教科书式结局。比较分界点前后的临床结局。
对2403例RDP中的1109例进行了学习曲线分析。分别在46、63和73例RDP手术后达到胜任、熟练和精通水平。达到胜任水平后,手术时间从245分钟降至235分钟(P = 0.002)。主要并发症发生率从20%降至15%反映了达到熟练水平(P = 0.012),而精通水平与更高比例的教科书式结局患者相关(71%对63%;P = 0.028)。术后胰瘘发生率在学习曲线过程中保持稳定,在18.5%至21.5%之间。既往腹腔镜经验通过缩短手术时间和更早降低主要并发症加速了学习过程。
在国际专家中心,分别在46、63和73例手术后达到RDP的胜任、熟练和精通水平。研究结果表明,术中参数的学习曲线完成得更早;然而,掌握RDP需要丰富的经验。