• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

内脏脂肪面积对机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术(TAKUMI-2)手术难度的影响

Impact of visceral fat area on surgical difficulty during robotic distal pancreatectomy (TAKUMI-2).

作者信息

Takagi Kosei, Yamada Motohiko, Fuji Tomokazu, Yasui Kazuya, Nishiyama Takeyoshi, Nagai Yasuo, Kanehira Noriyuki, Fujiwara Toshiyoshi

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikata-cho, Kita-ku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3137-3145. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11696-3. Epub 2025 Apr 4.

DOI:10.1007/s00464-025-11696-3
PMID:40183944
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12041091/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Difficulty scoring systems (DSS) have been developed to quantify the surgical complexity of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP). However, few studies have validated these systems in the context of robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). Moreover, the impact of body composition on RDP outcomes remains unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors of surgical difficulty in RDP, including body composition.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 72 consecutive patients who underwent RDP at our institution between April 2021 and October 2024. Using a modified DSS for LDP, patients were divided into three difficulty index groups. The association between the difficulty index and outcomes was investigated. Multivariate analyses were performed to identify risk factors associated with surgical difficulty (prolonged operative time) in RDP.

RESULTS

Patients were classified into three difficulty index groups: low (n = 28), intermediate (n = 25), and high (n = 19). Operative time was significantly associated with the surgical index (P = 0.01). Moreover, visceral fat area (VFA) was significantly correlated with operative time (r = 0.10, P = 0.008). The multivariate analyses found that VFA (≥ 100 cm) (odds ratio [OR] 5.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.32-22.4, P = 0.02), malignancy (OR 4.92, 95% CI 1.50-18.9, P = 0.01), and pancreatic resection on the portal vein (OR 4.14, 95% CI 1.24-15.9, P = 0.02) were significant risk factors associated with surgical difficulty.

CONCLUSION

VFA could be a novel and useful factor for assessing the surgical difficulty associated with RDP.

摘要

背景

已开发出难度评分系统(DSS)来量化腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LDP)的手术复杂性。然而,很少有研究在机器人远端胰腺切除术(RDP)的背景下验证这些系统。此外,身体成分对RDP结果的影响仍未得到探索。本研究旨在调查RDP手术难度的风险因素,包括身体成分。

方法

这项回顾性研究纳入了2021年4月至2024年10月期间在本机构接受RDP的72例连续患者。使用改良的LDP DSS,将患者分为三个难度指数组。研究了难度指数与结果之间的关联。进行多变量分析以确定与RDP手术难度(手术时间延长)相关的风险因素。

结果

患者分为三个难度指数组:低(n = 28)、中(n = 25)和高(n = 19)。手术时间与手术指数显著相关(P = 0.01)。此外,内脏脂肪面积(VFA)与手术时间显著相关(r = 0.10,P = 0.008)。多变量分析发现,VFA(≥100 cm)(优势比[OR] 5.03,95%置信区间[CI] 1.32 - 22.4,P = 0.02)、恶性肿瘤(OR 4.92,95% CI 1.50 - 18.9,P = 0.01)和门静脉胰腺切除术(OR 4.14,95% CI 1.24 - 15.9,P = 0.02)是与手术难度相关的显著风险因素。

结论

VFA可能是评估与RDP相关手术难度的一个新的有用因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/9d5a30969005/464_2025_11696_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/460d0bf492e8/464_2025_11696_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/771634a42a92/464_2025_11696_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/9e1b426250d6/464_2025_11696_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/9d5a30969005/464_2025_11696_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/460d0bf492e8/464_2025_11696_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/771634a42a92/464_2025_11696_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/9e1b426250d6/464_2025_11696_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0a53/12041091/9d5a30969005/464_2025_11696_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of visceral fat area on surgical difficulty during robotic distal pancreatectomy (TAKUMI-2).内脏脂肪面积对机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术(TAKUMI-2)手术难度的影响
Surg Endosc. 2025 May;39(5):3137-3145. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-11696-3. Epub 2025 Apr 4.
2
Minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy for PNETs: laparoscopic or robotic approach?胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤的微创远端胰腺切除术:腹腔镜手术还是机器人手术?
Oncotarget. 2017 May 16;8(20):33872-33883. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17513.
3
Robotic distal pancreatectomy reduces pancreatic fistula in patients without visceral obesity as compared to open distal pancreatectomy: A propensity score matching retrospective cohort study.机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术与开腹远端胰腺切除术相比,可减少非肥胖型内脏患者的胰瘘:一项倾向评分匹配回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2021 Jun;90:105960. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105960. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a French prospective single-center experience and cost-effectiveness analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术:法国单中心前瞻性经验及成本效益分析。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Aug;32(8):3562-3569. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6080-9. Epub 2018 Feb 2.
5
Cost-effectiveness of robotic vs laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Results from the national prospective trial ROBOCOSTES.机器人辅助与腹腔镜辅助胰体尾切除术的成本效益比较。ROBOCOSTES 全国前瞻性试验结果。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6270-6281. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11109-x. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: multicentre analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:多中心分析。
Br J Surg. 2021 Mar 12;108(2):188-195. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znaa039.
7
Comparing oncologic and surgical outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.比较机器人和腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的肿瘤学和手术结果:倾向匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5678-5685. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11147-5. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
8
A comparison between robotic-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy.机器人辅助腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术与腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术的比较。
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Mar;13(1). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1733. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
9
Postoperative outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus robotic distal pancreatectomy: a propensity-matched analysis.腹腔镜与机器人辅助胰体尾切除术的术后结果和费用:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2095-2105. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10728-8. Epub 2024 Mar 4.
10
A comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a single surgeon's robotic experience in a high-volume center.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的比较:高容量中心单外科医生的机器人手术经验。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Dec;36(12):9186-9193. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09402-8. Epub 2022 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Artery-First Approach During Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Outcomes from a Single Center and Comparison Between Laparoscopic and Robotic Approaches.胰腺癌微创胰十二指肠切除术中的动脉优先入路:单中心结果及腹腔镜与机器人手术入路的比较
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Jun 23;17(13):2103. doi: 10.3390/cancers17132103.

本文引用的文献

1
Competency, Proficiency, and Mastery: Learning Curves for Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy at 16 International Expert Centers.能力、熟练程度和精通程度:16个国际专家中心机器人远端胰腺切除术的学习曲线
Ann Surg. 2024 Nov 19. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006592.
2
The Liver Transection Area Is a Novel Predictor for Surgical Difficulty in Laparoscopic Liver Resection.肝离断面是腹腔镜肝切除手术难度的新型预测指标。
J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 24;13(19):5686. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195686.
3
Risk factors for postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) in gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
胃癌患者术后胰瘘(POPF)的危险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Nov;49(11):107092. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107092. Epub 2023 Sep 23.
4
Learning Curves in Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Pancreatic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Proposal of a Standardization.开放、腹腔镜及机器人胰腺手术的学习曲线:一项系统评价及标准化建议
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Jan 27;3(1):e111. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000111. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
The Brescia Internationally Validated European Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Surgery (EGUMIPS).布雷达国际微创胰腺手术验证性欧洲指南(EGUMIPS)。
Ann Surg. 2024 Jan 1;279(1):45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006006. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
6
Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy on perioperative outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜胰体尾切除术的围手术期结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):7-21. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01413-3. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
7
Surgical Strategies to Approaching the Splenic Artery in Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy.机器人胰体尾切除术时脾动脉入路的手术策略。
Anticancer Res. 2022 Sep;42(9):4471-4476. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.15947.
8
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: A Novel Standard of Care? Benchmark Values for Surgical Outcomes From 16 International Expert Centers.机器人辅助远端胰腺切除术:一种新的护理标准?来自16个国际专家中心的手术结果基准值。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):253-259. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005601. Epub 2022 Jul 19.
9
Robotic spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy using indocyanine green fluorescence imaging (with video).使用吲哚菁绿荧光成像的机器人保留脾脏远端胰腺切除术(附视频)
Asian J Surg. 2022 Jan;45(1):596-597. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 17.
10
Robotic Radical Antegrade Modular Pancreatosplenectomy Using the Supracolic Anterior Superior Mesenteric Artery Approach.机器人辅助顺行模块化胰脾切除术经结肠上腹腔前上肠系膜动脉入路
J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Nov;25(11):3015-3018. doi: 10.1007/s11605-021-05112-z. Epub 2021 Aug 11.