• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颧骨种植体在严重上颌骨萎缩中的修复作用:一项 274 例颧骨种植体的回顾性研究,平均随访时间为 7.5 年。

Zygomatic implants in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy: A retrospective study of 274 zygomatic implants with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years.

出版信息

Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2024 Nov 19;17(4):401-408.

PMID:39559940
Abstract

PURPOSE

Zygomatic implants are considered one of the last options for the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy when standard implants cannot be placed. They offer several advantages but can also present complications. This study aimed to investigate the long-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of zygomatic implant placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was conducted, and the inclusion criteria consisted of patients previously treated with zygomatic implants who had Class V or VI maxillary bone atrophy according to Cawood and Howell, and with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years after prosthetic loading. Outcome measures included implant and prosthesis survival rate, biological and biomechanical complications, and Lund-Mackay staging score before and after implant placement.

RESULTS

The study included 78 patients who received a total of 274 zygomatic implants. The mean follow-up period was 90.4 ± 26.0 months. Seventeen implant failures occurred, resulting in a survival rate of 93.8%, with a statistically significant negative correlation with smoking habits (P = 0.049), anchorage to the two zygomatic bone cortices (bicorticality) (P 0.001) and soft tissue complications (P 0.001). The prosthetic success rate was 92.3%. A statistically significant increase in maxillary sinus radiopacity was recorded when comparing the situation before and after surgery (P 0.001), and the intrasinus pathway had a statistically significant influence on that increase (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Zygomatic implants utilised for rehabilitating patients with severe maxillary atrophy have shown favourable outcomes. Nonetheless, owing to potential complications, strict case selection is necessary, combined with regular recall visits and proper oral hygiene maintenance. Furthermore, this type of surgery necessitates specialised training and expertise on the part of the practitioner.

摘要

目的

当标准种植体无法植入时,颧骨种植体被认为是严重上颌萎缩患者的最后一种修复选择。它们具有多种优势,但也可能出现并发症。本研究旨在探讨颧骨种植体植入的长期临床和影像学结果。

材料与方法

进行了回顾性病历审查,纳入标准为先前接受过颧骨种植体治疗的患者,这些患者根据 Cawood 和 Howell 分类法存在 V 类或 VI 类上颌骨萎缩,且在修复体加载后至少有 2 年的随访期。研究结果包括种植体和修复体的存活率、生物和生物力学并发症以及植入前后 Lund-Mackay 分期评分。

结果

本研究共纳入 78 例患者,共植入 274 枚颧骨种植体。平均随访时间为 90.4 ± 26.0 个月。发生了 17 例种植体失败,存活率为 93.8%,与吸烟习惯呈显著负相关(P = 0.049),与颧骨骨皮质的双皮质固定(P 0.001)和软组织并发症(P 0.001)也呈显著负相关。修复体成功率为 92.3%。与术前相比,术后上颌窦射线可透性明显增加(P 0.001),且窦内途径对上颌窦射线可透性的增加有显著影响(P = 0.003)。

结论

用于治疗严重上颌萎缩患者的颧骨种植体具有良好的效果。然而,由于存在潜在的并发症,因此需要严格选择病例,并结合定期复诊和适当的口腔卫生维护。此外,这种手术需要执业者具备专业的培训和专业知识。

相似文献

1
Zygomatic implants in the rehabilitation of severe maxillary atrophy: A retrospective study of 274 zygomatic implants with a mean follow-up period of 7.5 years.颧骨种植体在严重上颌骨萎缩中的修复作用:一项 274 例颧骨种植体的回顾性研究,平均随访时间为 7.5 年。
Int J Oral Implantol (Berl). 2024 Nov 19;17(4):401-408.
2
Rehabilitation of reabsorbed maxillae with implants in buttresses in patients with combination syndrome.联合综合征患者采用植入支抗骨内种植体修复吸收性上颌骨
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 May;70(5):e322-30. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2012.01.012.
3
Five-year outcome of a retrospective cohort study on the rehabilitation of completely edentulous atrophic maxillae with immediately loaded zygomatic implants placed extra-maxillary.一项关于采用上颌外植入即刻负重颧骨种植体修复完全无牙萎缩性上颌骨的回顾性队列研究的五年随访结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2014 Autumn;7(3):267-81.
4
Immediately loaded zygomatic implants vs conventional dental implants in augmented atrophic maxillae: 4 months post-loading results from a multicentre randomised controlled trial.即刻负重颧骨种植体与传统牙种植体用于上颌骨萎缩增量:一项多中心随机对照试验的负重后4个月结果
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2018;11(1):11-28.
5
Complications and risk factors associated with zygomatic implants: retrospective analysis with 73 consecutive patients followed for 3.5 years.颧骨种植体相关并发症及风险因素:对73例连续患者进行3.5年随访的回顾性分析。
Quintessence Int. 2025 Jan 30;56(1):46-59. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5841085.
6
Restoration of the edentulous maxilla using extrasinus zygomatic implants combined with anterior conventional implants: a retrospective study.采用上颌窦外提升颧骨种植体联合前牙常规种植体修复无牙颌:回顾性研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 May-Jun;26(3):665-72.
7
Evaluation of 31 zygomatic implants and 74 regular dental implants used in 16 patients for prosthetic reconstruction of the atrophic maxilla with cross-arch fixed bridges.评估16例患者使用31颗颧骨种植体和74颗常规牙种植体通过跨牙弓固定桥进行萎缩上颌骨修复重建的情况。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005;7(3):159-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2005.tb00060.x.
8
A prospective clinical study on titanium implants in the zygomatic arch for prosthetic rehabilitation of the atrophic edentulous maxilla with a follow-up of 6 months to 5 years.一项关于颧弓钛种植体用于萎缩性无牙上颌骨修复的前瞻性临床研究,随访时间为6个月至5年。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2006;8(3):114-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2006.00009.x.
9
Clinical outcome of 42 patients treated with 81 immediately loaded zygomatic implants: a 12- to 42-month retrospective study.42例接受81颗即刻负重颧骨种植体治疗患者的临床结果:一项12至42个月的回顾性研究。
Eur J Oral Implantol. 2008 Summer;9 Suppl 1(2):141-50.
10
Implants placed in the nasopalatine canal to rehabilitate severely atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study with long follow-up.植入鼻腭管以修复严重萎缩上颌骨:一项长期随访的回顾性研究
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Dec;40(6):699-706. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00145.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal bone-implant contact sites in the zygomatic region for quad zygomatic implants placement: a retrospective study in Vietnamese patients on CBCT.用于颧骨种植体植入的颧骨区域最佳骨-种植体接触部位:一项针对越南患者的CBCT回顾性研究
BDJ Open. 2025 Jun 20;11(1):61. doi: 10.1038/s41405-025-00350-8.