Brown Jonathan Y, Fernandez Gabriela Veiga, De La Torre Hernández Jose M, Murphy Michael, Wessler Benjamin S, Edelman Elazer R
Institute for Medical Engineering and Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave Building E25-RM442, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Clinical and Translation Science Institute, Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Feb;53(2):536-546. doi: 10.1007/s10439-024-03635-5. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
The impact of Aortic Stenosis (AS) on the left ventricle (LV) extends beyond the influence of the pressure drop across the stenotic valve, but also includes the additional serial afterload imposed by the vascular system. Aortic input impedance is the gold standard for comprehensively studying the contribution of the vascular system to total myocardial afterload, but in the past measurement has been challenging arising from the need for invasive catheterization or specialized equipment to precisely record time-resolved blood pressure and flow signals. The goal of this work was to develop and validate a novel simulation-based method for determining aortic input impedance using only clinically available echocardiographic data and a simple blood pressure measurement.
A simulation-based method to determine vascular impedance was developed using echocardiographic data and a brachial blood pressure measurement. Simulation-based impedance was compared to impedance calculated from echocardiographic flow data and pressure data from a non-invasive central pressure measurement device.
In validation analysis comparing patient-specific simulation-based vascular impedance to non-invasively measured impedance, correlation between methods across a range of vascular parameters varied between R = 0.40 and 0.99. A tendency was seen toward underestimation of pressure waveforms in point-by-point comparison of measured and simulated waveforms with an overall mean difference of 4.01 mmHg.
Requiring only non-invasive clinical data that are widely available, simulation-based vascular impedance has the potential to allow for easier, more widespread, and larger-scale investigation of the effect of vascular impedance on total LV afterload.
主动脉瓣狭窄(AS)对左心室(LV)的影响不仅限于狭窄瓣膜两端压力阶差的作用,还包括血管系统施加的额外串联后负荷。主动脉输入阻抗是全面研究血管系统对总心肌后负荷贡献的金标准,但过去由于需要进行侵入性导管插入术或使用专门设备精确记录时间分辨的血压和血流信号,测量一直具有挑战性。这项工作的目标是开发并验证一种仅使用临床可用的超声心动图数据和简单血压测量来确定主动脉输入阻抗的基于模拟的新方法。
利用超声心动图数据和肱动脉血压测量开发了一种基于模拟的确定血管阻抗的方法。将基于模拟的阻抗与根据超声心动图血流数据和来自非侵入性中心压力测量设备的压力数据计算得到的阻抗进行比较。
在将患者特异性的基于模拟的血管阻抗与非侵入性测量的阻抗进行比较的验证分析中,一系列血管参数下各方法之间的相关性在R = 0.40至0.99之间变化。在实测波形与模拟波形的逐点比较中,存在压力波形被低估的趋势,总体平均差异为4.01 mmHg。
基于模拟的血管阻抗仅需要广泛可用的非侵入性临床数据,有可能使对血管阻抗对左心室总后负荷影响的研究更容易、更广泛且更具规模。