Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar/Växjö, Sweden.
Ambulance Services, Region Kalmar County, Västervik, Sweden.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 20;24(1):1438. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11947-4.
Although coordination of care and integrated care models aim to enhance patient satisfaction and perceived care quality, evidence regarding their practical implementation remains scarce. Understanding the nuances of collaboration across care providers to achieve effective coordination of care is imperative for seamless care integration. The aim of this study was to construct a grounded theory of how inter-organizational collaboration is performed to support coordination of care for patients with complex care needs.
A qualitative design with a constructivist grounded theory approach was applied. In total, 86 participants with diverse backgrounds were recruited across multiple care settings, including hospitals, ambulance services, primary care centers, municipal home healthcare and home care services. The grounded theory was developed iteratively, based on a combination of observations and interviews, and using constant comparative analysis.
Coordination of care, a complex process that occurs across interconnected healthcare organizations, is manifested as "Negotiating care in organizational borderlands." Care coordination evolves through a spectrum of inter-organizational collaboration, ranging from "Dividing care by disease-specific expertise" to "Establishing paths for collaboration" and ultimately "Co-constructing a comprehensive whole." These categories highlight the challenges of coordinating care across both professional and organizational boundaries. In the multifaceted healthcare landscape, effective care coordination occurs when healthcare professionals actively bridge the divides, leveraging their collective expertise. Importantly, organizational boundaries may serve a purpose and should not be dissolved to facilitate effective care coordination.
The key to effective care coordination lies in robust inter-organizational collaboration. Even when patients receive integrated care, healthcare professionals may have fragmented roles. This research emphasizes the importance of clearly defined lines of accountability, reinforcing mutual responsibility and facilitating bridging of professional and organizational boundaries. Healthcare professionals and policymakers can use these insights to effectively utilize inter-organizational collaboration in supporting care coordination for patients with complex care needs.
尽管协调护理和综合护理模式旨在提高患者满意度和感知护理质量,但关于其实际实施的证据仍然很少。了解医疗保健提供者之间合作的细微差别对于实现有效的协调护理至关重要,因为这是无缝护理整合的基础。本研究旨在构建一个关于如何进行组织间协作以支持具有复杂护理需求的患者的协调护理的扎根理论。
采用定性设计和建构主义扎根理论方法。总共招募了 86 名来自多个护理环境的具有不同背景的参与者,包括医院、救护车服务、初级保健中心、市家庭保健和家庭护理服务。扎根理论是基于观察和访谈的结合,并使用不断比较分析,迭代开发的。
协调护理是一个跨越相互关联的医疗保健组织发生的复杂过程,表现为“在组织边缘协商护理”。协调护理通过一系列组织间的协作演变而来,从“按疾病专业知识划分护理”到“为合作建立途径”,最终“共同构建全面的整体”。这些类别突出了协调跨越专业和组织边界的护理的挑战。在多方面的医疗保健环境中,当医疗保健专业人员积极弥合鸿沟,利用他们的集体专业知识时,有效的协调护理才会发生。重要的是,组织边界可能有其目的,不应为了促进有效的协调护理而被消除。
有效的协调护理的关键在于强有力的组织间协作。即使患者接受了综合护理,医疗保健专业人员也可能具有分散的角色。这项研究强调了明确责任线的重要性,增强了相互责任,并促进了专业和组织边界的跨越。医疗保健专业人员和政策制定者可以利用这些见解,有效地利用组织间协作来支持具有复杂护理需求的患者的协调护理。