比较两种初始标本分流技术对血培养污染率和临床结局的影响——一项多中心研究。
Comparing the effects of two initial specimen diversion techniques on blood culture contamination rates and clinical outcomes-a multicenter study.
作者信息
Febres-Aldana Anthony, Ashley Patrycja, Amenta Eva, Duffey Megan, Sepulveda Theresa, Lopez Corina, Shay Sabra, Barrett Miriam, Lasco Todd, Pipkins Takei, Reed Margaret, Lembcke Bradley, Al Mohajer Mayar
机构信息
Department of Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Division of Infectious Disease, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.
出版信息
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Nov 11;4(1):e194. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.391. eCollection 2024.
Although the initial specimen diversion device (ISDD) has been shown to reduce blood culture contamination (BCC) rates, its impact on clinical outcomes remains unclear. This multicenter study showed that ISDD significantly decreased BCC. However, there was no reduction in length of stay, days of therapy, or central line-associated bloodstream infections.
尽管初始标本分流装置（ISDD）已被证明可降低血培养污染（BCC）率，但其对临床结局的影响仍不明确。这项多中心研究表明，ISDD可显著降低BCC。然而，住院时间、治疗天数或中心静脉导管相关血流感染并无减少。
Zotero 插件