• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缺血性卒中血管内治疗后患者不完全再灌注的自然演变

Natural Evolution of Incomplete Reperfusion in Patients Following Endovascular Therapy After Ischemic Stroke.

作者信息

Mujanovic Adnan, Windecker Daniel, Cimflova Petra, Meinel Thomas R, Seiffge David J, Auer Elias, Boulouis Grégoire, Arnold Marcel, Serrallach Bettina L, Rohner Roman, Janot Kevin, Dobrocky Tomas, Hill Michael D, Goyal Mayank, Piechowiak Eike I, Gralla Jan, Fischer Urs, Kaesmacher Johannes

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, University Hospital Bern, Inselspital (A.M., D.W., P.C., B.L.S., R.R., T.D., E.I.P., J.G., J.K.).

Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Freiburg, Germany (P.C.).

出版信息

Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):447-455. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049641. Epub 2024 Nov 20.

DOI:10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049641
PMID:39567366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11771359/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A third of endovascularly treated patients with stroke experience incomplete reperfusion (expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] <3), and the natural evolution of this incomplete reperfusion remains unknown. We systematically reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis on the natural evolution of incomplete reperfusion after endovascular therapy.

METHODS

A systematic review of MEDLINE, Embase, and PubMed up until March 1, 2024, using a predefined strategy. Only full-text English-written articles reporting rates of either favorable (ie, delayed reperfusion (DR) or no new infarct) or unfavorable progression (ie, persistent perfusion deficit or new infarct) of incompletely reperfused tissue were included. The primary outcome was the rate of DR and its association with functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score, 0-2) at 90 days postintervention. Pooled odds ratios with 95% CIs were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Six studies involving 950 patients (50.7% female; median age, 71 years; interquartile range, 60-79) were included. Four studies assessed the evolution of incomplete reperfusion on magnetic resonance imaging perfusion imaging, while 2 studies used diffusion-weighted imaging and noncontrast computed tomography imaging, where new infarct was used to denote unfavorable progression. Five studies defined incomplete reperfusion as eTICI 2b50 or 2c. DR occurred in 41% (interquartile range, 33%-51%) of cases 24 hours postintervention. Achieving DR was associated with a higher likelihood of functional independence at 90 days (odds ratio, 2.5 [95% CI, 1.9-3.4]).

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half of eTICI <3 patients achieve DR, leading to favorable clinical outcomes. This subgroup may derive limited or potentially harmful effects from pursuing additional reperfusion strategies (eg, intra-arterial lytics or secondary thrombectomy). Accurately predicting the evolution of incomplete reperfusion could optimize patient selection for adjunctive reperfusion strategies at the end of an intervention.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifiers: NCT05499832.

摘要

背景

三分之一接受血管内治疗的中风患者经历不完全再灌注(扩展脑梗死溶栓 [eTICI]<3),这种不完全再灌注的自然演变仍不清楚。我们系统回顾了文献,并对血管内治疗后不完全再灌注的自然演变进行了荟萃分析。

方法

使用预定义策略,对截至2024年3月1日的MEDLINE、Embase和PubMed进行系统回顾。仅纳入报告不完全再灌注组织的良好(即延迟再灌注 [DR] 或无新梗死)或不良进展(即持续灌注缺损或新梗死)发生率的英文全文文章。主要结局是DR的发生率及其与干预后90天功能独立性(改良Rankin量表评分,0-2)的关联。使用随机效应模型计算合并优势比及95%置信区间。

结果

纳入6项研究,共950例患者(女性占50.7%;中位年龄71岁;四分位间距,60-79岁)。4项研究通过磁共振成像灌注成像评估不完全再灌注的演变,2项研究使用扩散加权成像和非增强计算机断层扫描成像,其中新梗死用于表示不良进展。5项研究将不完全再灌注定义为eTICI 2b50或2c。干预后24小时,41%(四分位间距,33%-51%)的病例发生DR。实现DR与90天时功能独立的可能性更高相关(优势比,2.5 [95%置信区间,1.9-3.4])。

结论

近一半eTICI<3的患者实现DR,带来良好的临床结局。该亚组患者采用额外的再灌注策略(如动脉内溶栓或二次血栓切除术)可能产生有限或潜在有害的影响。准确预测不完全再灌注的演变可优化干预结束时辅助再灌注策略的患者选择。

注册

网址:https://www.clinicaltrials.gov;唯一标识符:NCT05499832。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/6c83ef48f0ea/str-56-447-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/2365573d64e9/str-56-447-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/5edf34f77e8e/str-56-447-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/e75e3e2e05ce/str-56-447-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/6c83ef48f0ea/str-56-447-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/2365573d64e9/str-56-447-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/5edf34f77e8e/str-56-447-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/e75e3e2e05ce/str-56-447-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fc7a/11771359/6c83ef48f0ea/str-56-447-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Natural Evolution of Incomplete Reperfusion in Patients Following Endovascular Therapy After Ischemic Stroke.缺血性卒中血管内治疗后患者不完全再灌注的自然演变
Stroke. 2025 Feb;56(2):447-455. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049641. Epub 2024 Nov 20.
2
Effect of Thrombolytics on Delayed Reperfusion After Incomplete Thrombectomy: Target Trial Emulation.溶栓剂对不完全血栓切除术术后延迟再灌注的影响:目标试验模拟
Neurology. 2025 May 27;104(10):e213641. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213641. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
3
Persistent Tissue-Level Hypoperfusion (No-Reflow) Negates the Clinical Benefit of Successful Thrombectomy.持续性组织水平低灌注(无复流)抵消了成功血栓切除术的临床益处。
Stroke. 2025 Jun;56(6):1451-1459. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.049574. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
4
Late Lesion Growth following Endovascular Therapy: Is 24 h Too Early to Assess Acute Infarct Size Including the Effects of Secondary Injury?血管内治疗后晚期病变生长:评估急性梗死面积(包括继发性损伤的影响),24小时是否太早?
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2025;54(1):129-137. doi: 10.1159/000536470. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
5
Intra-Arterial Tenecteplase Following Endovascular Reperfusion for Large Vessel Occlusion Acute Ischemic Stroke: The POST-TNK Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内再灌注治疗大血管闭塞急性缺血性卒中后动脉内注射替奈普酶:POST-TNK随机临床试验
JAMA. 2025 Feb 18;333(7):579-588. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.23466.
6
Early Infarct Growth Rate Correlation With Endovascular Thrombectomy Clinical Outcomes: Analysis From the SELECT Study.早期梗死增长率与血管内血栓切除术临床结局的相关性:SELECT 研究分析。
Stroke. 2021 Jan;52(1):57-69. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030912. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
7
Effect of Thrombectomy With Combined Contact Aspiration and Stent Retriever vs Stent Retriever Alone on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: The ASTER2 Randomized Clinical Trial.接触性抽吸联合支架取栓与单纯支架取栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中伴大血管闭塞患者的血管再通效果比较:ASTER2 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 28;326(12):1158-1169. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.13827.
8
Clinical Outcomes and Identification of Patients With Persistent Penumbral Profiles Beyond 24 Hours From Last Known Well: Analysis From DEFUSE 3.发病 24 小时后仍存在持续性组织半暗带患者的临床结局和识别:来自 DEFUSE 3 的分析。
Stroke. 2021 Mar;52(3):838-849. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031147. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
9
Impact of Strategy on Clinical Outcome in Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Successfully Reperfused: ETIS Registry Results.成功再灌注的大血管闭塞性卒中的策略对临床结局的影响:ETIS 登记研究结果。
Stroke. 2022 Jan;53(1):e1-e4. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034422. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
10
eTICI reperfusion: defining success in endovascular stroke therapy.血管内卒中治疗中的再灌注:定义成功。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 May;11(5):433-438. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014127. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Thrombolytics on Delayed Reperfusion After Incomplete Thrombectomy: Target Trial Emulation.溶栓剂对不完全血栓切除术术后延迟再灌注的影响:目标试验模拟
Neurology. 2025 May 27;104(10):e213641. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213641. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
2
Adjunctive intra-arterial thrombolysis following successful endovascular reperfusion in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials.急性缺血性卒中血管内再灌注成功后辅助动脉内溶栓治疗:七项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
J Neurol. 2025 Apr 17;272(5):345. doi: 10.1007/s00415-025-13092-2.

本文引用的文献

1
The Imaging-Neuropathological Gap in Acute Large Vessel Occlusive Stroke.急性大血管闭塞性卒中的影像-病理差距。
Stroke. 2024 Dec;55(12):2909-2920. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047384. Epub 2024 Sep 5.
2
Perfusion Abnormalities on 24-Hour Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Complete Endovascular Reperfusion.24 小时灌注成像中完全血管内再灌注患者的灌注异常。
Stroke. 2024 Sep;55(9):2315-2324. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.047441. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
3
Emerging Adjuvant Thrombolytic Therapies for Acute Ischemic Stroke Reperfusion.
急性缺血性脑卒中再灌注的新兴辅助溶栓治疗。
Stroke. 2024 Oct;55(10):2536-2546. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.124.045755. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
4
External Validation of a Model for Persistent Perfusion Deficit in Patients With Incomplete Reperfusion After Thrombectomy: EXTEND-PROCEED.EXTEND-PROCEED:经皮机械血栓切除术治疗后再灌注不完全患者持续性灌注缺损模型的外部验证。
Neurology. 2024 Jul 23;103(2):e209401. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209401. Epub 2024 Jun 20.
5
Value of Immediate Flat Panel Perfusion Imaging after Endovascular Therapy (AFTERMATH): A Proof of Concept Study.血管内治疗后即刻平板灌注成像的价值(AFTERMATH):一项概念验证研究。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2024 Feb 7;45(2):163-170. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A8103.
6
Value of intravenous thrombolysis in endovascular treatment for large-vessel anterior circulation stroke: individual participant data meta-analysis of six randomised trials.静脉溶栓在大血管前循环卒中血管内治疗中的价值:六项随机试验的个体参与者数据荟萃分析
Lancet. 2023 Sep 16;402(10406):965-974. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01142-X. Epub 2023 Aug 25.
7
Predictors of tissue infarction from distal emboli after mechanical thrombectomy.机械取栓后远端栓塞引起的组织梗死的预测因素。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Sep 17;16(10):959-965. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020782.
8
Intra-Arterial Thrombolysis is Associated with Delayed Reperfusion of Remaining Vessel Occlusions following Incomplete Thrombectomy.动脉内溶栓与不完全血栓切除术后剩余血管闭塞的延迟再通有关。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2023 Sep;44(9):1050-1056. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A7943. Epub 2023 Jul 27.
9
Effect of incomplete reperfusion patterns on clinical outcome: insights from the ESCAPE-NA1 trial.不完全再灌注模式对临床结局的影响:ESCAPE-NA1 试验的结果。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2024 Jul 16;16(8):809-814. doi: 10.1136/jnis-2023-020553.
10
Prediction of delayed reperfusion in patients with incomplete reperfusion following thrombectomy.预测血栓切除术后不完全再灌注患者的延迟再灌注。
Eur Stroke J. 2023 Jun;8(2):456-466. doi: 10.1177/23969873231164274. Epub 2023 Mar 24.