Recio-Rodriguez Jose I, Fernandez-Crespo Mei, Sanchez-Aguadero Natalia, Gonzalez-Sanchez Jesús, Garcia-Yu Irene A, Alonso-Dominguez Rosario, Chiu Hsiao-Yean, Tsai Pei-Shan, Lee Hsin-Chien, Rihuete-Galve Maria I
Facultad de Enfermería y Fisioterapia, Universidad de Salamanca, Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Red de Investigación en Cronicidad, Atención Primaria y Promoción de la Salud (RICAPPS), Salamanca, Spain.
Universidad de Salamanca, Unidad de Investigación de Atención Primaria de Salamanca (APISAL), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain.
Front Neurosci. 2024 Nov 6;18:1450163. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1450163. eCollection 2024.
This systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized-clinical trials aims to analyze the effect of interventions incorporating surface neurofeedback techniques on self-perceived sleep quality and insomnia in patients with or without sleep disturbances.
The review was completed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and was deposited in the Prospero international prospective registry of systematic reviews (CRD42024528401). Seven clinical trials with different main outcomes but with pre-post intervention records of self-perceived sleep quality or insomnia symptoms assessed by questionnaires met our inclusion criteria, including a publication date within the last 10 years. Five trials investigated sleep quality through scores on the Pittsburgh sleep quality Index (PSQI) and three trials signs of insomnia severity assessed with validated scales. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias and showed a high quality of them.
A total of 5 studies that evaluated sleep quality with the PSQI total score were included in the meta-analysis. The results revealed that control conditions succeeded in improving PSQI-assessed sleep quality more than the analyzed Neurofeedback interventions (PSQI total score 0.57; 95% CI 0.13 to 1.01; = 0.01). On the other hand, a total of 3 studies that evaluated insomnia severity with various insomnia scales were included in the meta-analysis The results revealed that neither the NF interventions nor the control conditions show a favorable outcome relative to each other (-0.13; 95% CI -0.44 to 0.18; = 0.41).
The interventions studied mostly apply a neurofeedback training protocol based on maintaining alpha waves in a range between 8 and 12 Hz, with electrode positioning in the frontal area or in the sensorimotor cortex and with a number of neurofeedback sessions ranging from 8 to 20 sessions. The meta-analysis showed that interventions incorporating surface neurofeedback do not produce additional benefits in self-perception of sleep quality or insomnia compared to a wide variety of control conditions including cognitive behavioral treatment or other biofeedback modalities.
PROSPERO - International prospective register of systematic reviews - CRD42024528401 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=528401.
本随机临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析旨在分析采用表面神经反馈技术的干预措施对有或无睡眠障碍患者的自我感知睡眠质量和失眠的影响。
本评价按照系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明完成,并已存入国际系统评价前瞻性注册库Prospero(CRD42024528401)。七项临床试验的主要结果不同,但有通过问卷评估的自我感知睡眠质量或失眠症状的干预前后记录,符合我们的纳入标准,包括过去10年内发表的文献。五项试验通过匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评分调查睡眠质量,三项试验用有效量表评估失眠严重程度迹象。使用Cochrane协作网的偏倚风险评估工具对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估,结果显示其质量较高。
荟萃分析共纳入5项用PSQI总分评估睡眠质量的研究。结果显示,与分析的神经反馈干预相比,对照条件在改善PSQI评估的睡眠质量方面更成功(PSQI总分0.57;95%可信区间0.13至1.01;P = 0.01)。另一方面,荟萃分析共纳入3项用各种失眠量表评估失眠严重程度的研究。结果显示,神经反馈干预和对照条件相对于彼此均未显示出有利结果(-0.13;95%可信区间-0.44至0.18;P = 0.41)。
所研究的干预措施大多采用基于维持8至12赫兹范围内阿尔法波的神经反馈训练方案,电极置于额叶区域或感觉运动皮层,神经反馈疗程数为8至20次。荟萃分析表明,与包括认知行为治疗或其他生物反馈方式在内的多种对照条件相比,采用表面神经反馈的干预措施在睡眠质量或失眠自我感知方面不会产生额外益处。
Prospero - 国际系统评价前瞻性注册库 - CRD42024528401 https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=528401