Suppr超能文献

大分割加速放射剂量描绘(HARD)改善了不可切除软组织肉瘤的治疗效果。

Hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) improves outcomes in unresected soft-tissue sarcoma.

作者信息

Bryant John Michael, Mills Matthew N, Liveringhouse Casey, Palm Russell, Druta Mihaela, Brohl Andrew, Reed Damon R, Johnstone Peter A, Miller Justin T, Latifi Kujtim, Feygelman Vladimir, Yang George Q, Naghavi Arash O

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa 33612, FL, USA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa 33612, FL, USA.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2025 Jan;202:110644. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110644. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are radioresistant with a low α/β, which may have a biologic benefit with hypofractionation. For unresectable STS, the dose escalation required to achieve durable control is often limited by long-term toxicity risk. We sought to compare an isotoxic approach utilizing hypofractionated accelerated radiation dose-painting (HARD) versus standard fractionated radiation therapy (SFT) in patients with unresected STS. We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with unresected STS who received either HARD (n = 49) or SFT (n = 43) with photon-based therapy between 1990 and 2022. The 2 HARD regimens each use 3 dose levels based on risk of disease burden. The gross disease, intermediate risk, and low-risk clinical target volumes were treated with either 20-22 fractions of 3/2.5/2-2.2 Gy or 28 fractions of 2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy. SFT included patients treated with definitive intent, receiving ≥ 50 Gy in 1.8-2 Gy per fraction. Clinical endpoints included 3-year local control (LC), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS), along with treatment-related toxicity. With a median age of 67 and tumor size of 7 cm, most patients were stage IV (37 %), grade 3 (67 %), had no concurrent systemic therapy (70 %), and were lower extremity tumors (24 %). HARD cohort consisted of higher age, stage, recurrent disease, and median BED (p < 0.05), when compared to SFT. With a median follow-up of 35.9 months, HARD demonstrated significant improvement in 3-year LC (96.4 % vs. 48.4 %, p < 0.001), compared to SFT overall, with a median PFS benefit (16 vs. 10 months, p = 0.037) for non-distantly metastatic patients at baseline. On multivariate analysis, HARD was significantly associated with improved LC (HR 0.058, 95 % CI 0.005-0.682, p = 0.024). The HARD regimen found no significant increase in toxicity, with limited acute grade 3 (24 %, all dermatitis) and late grade 3 toxicity (6 %) observed, with no grade 4 or 5 events. HARD regimen significantly improves LC for unresectable STS without a significant increase in toxicity, when compared to a standard fractionated approach, supporting further prospective investigation of this treatment approach.

摘要

软组织肉瘤(STS)具有低α/β比值,对放疗有抗性,这可能使大分割放疗具有生物学益处。对于无法切除的STS,实现持久控制所需的剂量增加往往受到长期毒性风险的限制。我们试图比较在无法切除的STS患者中,采用大分割加速放疗剂量勾画(HARD)的等毒性方法与标准分割放疗(SFT)的效果。我们对1990年至2022年间接受基于光子治疗的无法切除的STS患者进行了回顾性分析,这些患者接受了HARD(n = 49)或SFT(n = 43)治疗。两种HARD方案均根据疾病负担风险使用3个剂量水平。大体肿瘤、中度风险和低风险临床靶区分别接受20 - 22次分割,每次3/2.5/2 - 2.2 Gy或28次分割,每次2.5/2.2/1.8 Gy。SFT包括以根治为目的治疗的患者,每次分割剂量为1.8 - 2 Gy,总剂量≥50 Gy。临床终点包括3年局部控制(LC)、总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),以及治疗相关毒性。患者中位年龄为67岁,肿瘤大小为7 cm,大多数患者为IV期(37%)、3级(67%),未接受同步全身治疗(70%),肿瘤位于下肢(24%)。与SFT相比,HARD队列患者年龄更大、分期更高、有复发病史且中位生物等效剂量更高(p < 0.05)。中位随访35.9个月时,与总体SFT相比,HARD的3年LC有显著改善(96.4% vs. 48.4%,p < 0.001),基线时非远处转移患者的中位PFS有获益(16个月 vs. 10个月,p = 0.037)。多因素分析显示,HARD与改善的LC显著相关(HR 0.058,95% CI 0.005 - 0.682,p = 0.024)。HARD方案未发现毒性显著增加,仅观察到有限的急性3级毒性(24%,均为皮炎)和晚期3级毒性(6%),无4级或5级事件。与标准分割方法相比,HARD方案可显著改善无法切除的STS的LC,且毒性无显著增加,支持对该治疗方法进行进一步的前瞻性研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验