Suppr超能文献

可切除的胃癌:我们是否应根据微卫星状态应用个体化手术策略?

Resectable gastric cancer: should we apply a tailored surgical strategy according to microsatellite status?

作者信息

Muttillo Edoardo Maria, Di Cicco Leonardo, La Franca Alice, Lucarini Alessio, Arrivi Giulia, Li Causi Francesco Saverio, Castagnola Giorgio, Scarinci Andrea, Pilozzi Emanuela, Mazzuca Federica, Balducci Genoveffa, Meniconi Roberto Luca, Ettorre Giuseppe Maria, Mercantini Paolo

机构信息

Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy; Department of Digestive Surgery, Hopital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.

Department of Medical Surgical Science and Translational Medicine, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

J Gastrointest Surg. 2025 Feb;29(2):101890. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.101890. Epub 2024 Nov 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High microsatellite instability (MSI) represents a small subgroup of gastric cancer (GC) with favorable prognostic and predictive significance. This study aimed to investigate locoregional lymph node (LN) involvement, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and the interplay between molecular subtypes and histologic profiles regarding survival outcomes in MSI GC vs microsatellite stability (MSS) GC.

METHODS

This study included 72 patients with GC who underwent surgery with or without chemotherapy from 2017 to 2023. Clinicopathologic characteristics, OS, and DFS were compared between LN-positive and LN-negative patients stratified by microsatellite status, treatments, molecular profiles, and tumor cell types.

RESULTS

MSI GC was more common in older patients (79.0 vs 70.2 years; P <.001), more common in females (73.68% vs 43.32%; P =.023), and associated with intestinal-type histology (94.5% vs 49.0%; P =.002). Positive LN involvement and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) were lower in the MSI group than in the MSS group (positive LN: 2.73 vs 4.15, respectively; P =.366; LVI: 36.8% vs 64.5%, respectively; P =.039). Patients with MSI showed slightly better OS and DFS than those with MSS (OS: 84.20% vs 66.00%, respectively; P =.108; DFS: 84.62% vs 63.89%, respectively; P =.120). In addition, compared with patients with MSS GC, those with MSI GC had improved OS and DFS in the LN-positive group (OS: 72.7% vs 61.3%, respectively; P =.255; DFS: 75.0% vs 50.0%, respectively; P =.148) and LN-negative group (OS: 100.0% vs 85.7%, respectively; P =.149; DFS: 100.0% vs 85.7%, respectively; P =.376). In patients not receiving chemotherapy, the MSI/intestinal-type group had the highest OS and DFS (77.0% and 87.5%, respectively; P =.024), whereas the MSS/mixed-type group had the lowest OS and DFS (25.0% and 100.0%, respectively; P =.290). In patients receiving chemotherapy, the MSI/intestinal-type group had the highest OS and DFS (100.0% and 100.0%, respectively; P =.741), whereas the MSS/mixed-type group had the lowest OS and DFS (66.7% and 50.0%, respectively; P =.397).

CONCLUSION

First, patients with MSI GC have a significantly lower risk of locoregional LN involvement and better OS and DFS than those with MSS GC. Second, treatment responses differ based on MSI status: patients with MSI tumors benefit more from upfront surgical interventions, whereas those with MSS, particularly mixed histotypes, demonstrate improved outcomes with preoperative chemotherapy. These results advocate for a tailored therapeutic approach that considers microsatellite status, Lauren classification, and patient clinical conditions.

摘要

背景

高微卫星不稳定性(MSI)代表胃癌(GC)的一个小亚组,具有良好的预后和预测意义。本研究旨在调查局部区域淋巴结(LN)受累情况、总生存期(OS)、无病生存期(DFS),以及MSI GC与微卫星稳定(MSS)GC在生存结局方面分子亚型与组织学特征之间的相互作用。

方法

本研究纳入了2017年至2023年期间72例行手术治疗(无论是否接受化疗)的GC患者。根据微卫星状态、治疗方式、分子特征和肿瘤细胞类型对LN阳性和LN阴性患者的临床病理特征、OS和DFS进行比较。

结果

MSI GC在老年患者中更常见(79.0岁对70.2岁;P<.001),在女性中更常见(73.68%对43.32%;P=.023),且与肠型组织学相关(94.5%对49.0%;P=.002)。MSI组的LN阳性受累和淋巴管侵犯(LVI)低于MSS组(LN阳性:分别为2.73对4.15;P=.366;LVI:分别为36.8%对64.5%;P=.039)。MSI患者的OS和DFS略优于MSS患者(OS:分别为84.20%对66.00%;P=.108;DFS:分别为84.62%对63.89%;P=.120)。此外,与MSS GC患者相比,MSI GC患者在LN阳性组(OS:分别为72.7%对61.3%;P=.255;DFS:分别为75.0%对50.0%;P=.148)和LN阴性组(OS:分别为100.0%对85.7%;P=.149;DFS:分别为100.0%对85.7%;P=.376)中的OS和DFS有所改善。在未接受化疗的患者中,MSI/肠型组的OS和DFS最高(分别为77.0%和87.5%;P=.024),而MSS/混合型组的OS和DFS最低(分别为25.0%和100.0%;P=.290)。在接受化疗的患者中,MSI/肠型组的OS和DFS最高(分别为100.0%和100.0%;P=.741),而MSS/混合型组的OS和DFS最低(分别为66.7%和50.0%;P=.397)。

结论

首先,与MSS GC患者相比,MSI GC患者局部区域LN受累风险显著更低,OS和DFS更好。其次,治疗反应因MSI状态而异:MSI肿瘤患者从前期手术干预中获益更多,而MSS患者,尤其是混合型组织学类型患者,术前化疗可改善预后。这些结果提倡一种考虑微卫星状态、劳伦分类和患者临床情况的个体化治疗方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验