Suppr超能文献

终末期肾病患者的血压变异性与虚弱

Blood Pressure Variability and Frailty in End-Stage Kidney Disease.

机构信息

Tobia Zanotto, Ph.D., Department of Occupational Therapy Education, School of Health Professions, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3901 Rainbow Blvd, Kansas City, KS, 66160, United States. Email:

出版信息

J Frailty Aging. 2024;13(4):534-540. doi: 10.14283/jfa.2024.61.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

High blood pressure variability (BPV) is a predictor of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality in people with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and a marker of aging in geriatric populations. Nevertheless, the relationship between BPV and geriatric syndromes, such as frailty, in people with ESKD is not well understood.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between very short-term BPV and frailty in people with ESKD and receiving hemodialysis.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Three dialysis units in the United Kingdom.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-nine people receiving hemodialysis (median age=62.0 years, interquartile range [IQR]=19.0; 52.2% male; median dialysis vintage=1.1 years, IQR=2.4).

MEASUREMENTS

Systolic and diastolic BPV were recorded using continuous, non-invasive BP monitoring (Task Force Monitor). The very low, low, and high frequency components of BPV (VLF-BPV, LF-BPV, and HF-BPV), as well as the power spectral density (PSD-BPV) and low frequency/high frequency ratio of BPV (LF/HF-BPV) were analyzed. Frailty was evaluated using the Fried frailty phenotype.

RESULTS

Twenty-six (37.7%) participants were classified as frail and 43 (62.3%) as non-frail. Frail participants had higher median systolic (2.1, IQR=5.2 mmHg2 vs. 1.1, IQR=1.6 mmHg2, p=0.002) and diastolic HF-BPV (0.9, IQR=2.3 mmHg2 vs. 0.5, IQR=1.0 mmHg2, p=0.048) compared to their non-frail counterparts. In addition, frail participants had higher median systolic VLF-BPV (3.2, IQR=12.5 mmHg2 vs. 2.0, IQR=2.4 mmHg2, p=0.012), LF-BPV (2.0, IQR=3.8 mmHg2 vs. 1.1, IQR=2.0 mmHg2, p=0.016), and PSD-BPV (6.6, IQR=27.6 mmHg2 vs. 4.5, IQR=5.9 mmHg2, p=0.005) compared to the non-frail participants. In age- and sex-adjusted logistic regression analyses, only systolic VLF-BPV (odds ratio [OR]=1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.01-1.26, p=0.035), HF-BPV (OR=1.26, 95%CI:1.01-1.57, p=0.044), and PSD-BPV (OR=1.06, 95%CI:1.01-1.12, p=0.029) were associated with increased odds of being frail.

CONCLUSION

Higher systolic BPV is associated with frailty in people receiving hemodialysis. Beat-to-beat assessments of BPV through continuous, non-invasive BP monitoring may be useful in evaluating frailty in ESKD populations.

摘要

背景

高血压变异性(BPV)是终末期肾病(ESKD)患者心血管事件和全因死亡率的预测因子,也是老年人群衰老的标志物。然而,ESKD 患者的 BPV 与衰弱等老年综合征之间的关系尚不清楚。

目的

探讨 ESKD 接受血液透析患者的极短期 BPV 与衰弱之间的关系。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

英国的三个透析单位。

参与者

69 名接受血液透析的患者(中位年龄 62.0 岁,四分位间距 [IQR]=19.0;52.2%为男性;中位透析龄 1.1 年,IQR=2.4)。

测量

使用连续、非侵入性血压监测(Task Force Monitor)记录收缩压和舒张压变异性。分析极低频、低频和高频 BPV(VLF-BPV、LF-BPV 和 HF-BPV)以及血压变异性的功率谱密度(PSD-BPV)和低频/高频比值(LF/HF-BPV)。使用 Fried 衰弱表型评估衰弱。

结果

26 名(37.7%)参与者被归类为衰弱,43 名(62.3%)为非衰弱。与非衰弱者相比,衰弱者的收缩压(2.1,IQR=5.2 mmHg2 vs. 1.1,IQR=1.6 mmHg2,p=0.002)和舒张压 HF-BPV(0.9,IQR=2.3 mmHg2 vs. 0.5,IQR=1.0 mmHg2,p=0.048)更高。此外,与非衰弱者相比,衰弱者的收缩压 VLF-BPV(3.2,IQR=12.5 mmHg2 vs. 2.0,IQR=2.4 mmHg2,p=0.012)、LF-BPV(2.0,IQR=3.8 mmHg2 vs. 1.1,IQR=2.0 mmHg2,p=0.016)和 PSD-BPV(6.6,IQR=27.6 mmHg2 vs. 4.5,IQR=5.9 mmHg2,p=0.005)更高。在年龄和性别调整的逻辑回归分析中,只有收缩压 VLF-BPV(比值比 [OR]=1.13,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.01-1.26,p=0.035)、HF-BPV(OR=1.26,95%CI:1.01-1.57,p=0.044)和 PSD-BPV(OR=1.06,95%CI:1.01-1.12,p=0.029)与衰弱的几率增加相关。

结论

收缩压 BPV 较高与血液透析患者的衰弱有关。通过连续、非侵入性血压监测进行的血压变异性实时评估可能有助于评估 ESKD 人群的衰弱。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验