Kuzdzal Adrian, Ernst Edzard, Posadzki Pawel, Wronski Zbigniew
College of Medical Sciences, Institute of Health Sciences, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland.
Complementary Medicine, Peninsula Medical School, University of Exeter, Devon, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Pain Rep. 2024 Nov 20;9(6):e1208. doi: 10.1097/PR9.0000000000001208. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Orofacial pain (OFP) is an ache in the front part of the head and typically has musculoskeletal, dental, neural, or sinogenic origin. Dry needling (DN) is the insertion of a solid sterile fine needle through the skin aimed at deactivating the myofascial trigger points has extensively been studied in randomized clinical trials (RCTs). This systematic review was aimed at evaluating the evidence base for the effectiveness of DN for OFP. We searched Medline, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science (from their respective inceptions to February 2024) for RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of DN in patients with OFP. Studies with individuals suffering from cervicogenic or tension type headaches as well as observational studies were excluded. Primary outcomes were pain intensity and severity; secondary outcomes were disability, quality of life, and adverse effects. The review adhered to the methods described by in the Cochrane Handbook. Twenty-four RCTs with a total of 1,318 patients suffering from OFP were included. Most had an unclear or high risk of bias, and the quality of the evidence ranged from very low to low for all comparisons and outcomes. A meta-analysis suggested that, compared with usual care alone, DN + usual care had no effect on pain intensity (visual analogue scale) (standardized mean difference = -1.89, 95% confidence intervals -5.81 to 2.02, very low certainty evidence) at follow-ups of up to 6 weeks. There is little reliable evidence for the effectiveness of DN in reducing OFP. Future, larger, more rigorous studies might reduce the existing uncertainties.
口面部疼痛(OFP)是头部前部的疼痛,通常起源于肌肉骨骼、牙齿、神经或鼻窦。干针疗法(DN)是将一根实心无菌细针插入皮肤,旨在使肌筋膜触发点失活,该疗法已在随机临床试验(RCT)中得到广泛研究。本系统评价旨在评估干针疗法治疗口面部疼痛有效性的证据基础。我们检索了Medline、Cochrane Central和Web of Science(从各自创刊至2024年2月),以查找评估干针疗法对口面部疼痛患者有效性的随机对照试验。排除了患有颈源性或紧张型头痛的个体的研究以及观察性研究。主要结局是疼痛强度和严重程度;次要结局是残疾、生活质量和不良反应。该评价遵循Cochrane手册中描述的方法。纳入了24项随机对照试验,共有1318名头面部疼痛患者。大多数研究存在不明确或高偏倚风险,所有比较和结局的证据质量从极低到低不等。一项荟萃分析表明,与单纯常规护理相比,在长达6周的随访中,干针疗法+常规护理对疼痛强度(视觉模拟量表)没有影响(标准化均差=-1.89,95%置信区间为-5.81至2.02,极低确定性证据)。几乎没有可靠证据表明干针疗法在减轻口面部疼痛方面有效。未来,规模更大、更严格的研究可能会减少现有的不确定性。